From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F0C35C43331 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 20:18:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bombadil.infradead.org (bombadil.infradead.org [198.137.202.133]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7FE4C20757 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 20:18:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lists.infradead.org header.i=@lists.infradead.org header.b="dr1KmHRM" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 7FE4C20757 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=deneb.enyo.de Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-snps-arc-bounces+linux-snps-arc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lists.infradead.org; s=bombadil.20170209; h=Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:Cc:List-Subscribe:List-Help:List-Post: List-Archive:List-Unsubscribe:List-Id:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To: Date:References:Subject:To:From:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description: Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID: List-Owner; bh=ACP8derO73qjHx8aF/RkRKdhKiCEZTKhvELfGCJ13c4=; b=dr1KmHRMNih/PN xm7yzlGwQJ3tZSpY1o8Rwd1LaSBUCU3X20UW5QsHBgR5ESePwzm1EyOvBXSeVDYFy04r0OAnw2gD6 ad4TpwK3m8ZkMjkdGmNtiX8O6VQt+sgZcLkPe2trfTSscOX4Rrkd7shM61AOeY4dkAENMrUU+1J6b RWLWlpGc06G4ve7BggeZmwJzh8GEtbrpjB3ctHGoLVhJZcq2J3qQRXJty37awxJw0Pz++CGOHtQJo GTzLUHfWnvVgBpfOb6NyWvLR41X+qXGshIQ04zccAy3aqhFjFddM3iQ4STdlfdPbADw0WhgQIbSzV l7UnDQTxIxCqUiZzNa+w==; Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=bombadil.infradead.org) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtp (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jJNLL-0005WV-Kp; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 20:18:39 +0000 Received: from albireo.enyo.de ([37.24.231.21]) by bombadil.infradead.org with esmtps (Exim 4.92.3 #3 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1jJNLI-0005Vu-Hc for linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 20:18:37 +0000 Received: from [172.17.203.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de) by albireo.enyo.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) id 1jJNLD-0003Dy-5d; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 20:18:31 +0000 Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jJNLD-0004me-3Z; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 22:18:31 +0200 From: Florian Weimer To: Vineet Gupta Subject: Re: [PATCH] provide y2038 safe socket constants References: <20200329041612.4071-1-vgupta@synopsys.com> <87r1x8qpx6.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2020 22:18:31 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Vineet Gupta's message of "Tue, 31 Mar 2020 20:02:58 +0000") Message-ID: <874ku4qnvs.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 X-CRM114-Version: 20100106-BlameMichelson ( TRE 0.8.0 (BSD) ) MR-646709E3 X-CRM114-CacheID: sfid-20200331_131836_583096_09CDCBDF X-CRM114-Status: UNSURE ( 5.58 ) X-CRM114-Notice: Please train this message. X-BeenThere: linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on Synopsys ARC Processors List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Stepan Golosunov , "linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org" , Alistair Francis Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: "linux-snps-arc" Errors-To: linux-snps-arc-bounces+linux-snps-arc=archiver.kernel.org@lists.infradead.org * Vineet Gupta: > On 3/31/20 12:34 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: >> What about the parallel changes to the sysdeps overrides? I would> expect changes for hppa, mips, powerpc. (Not sure about the alpha >> situation.) > > This patch fixes the existing/future asm-generic ABI enabled arches > and the ones you refer to are not. So IMHO that would be a separate > patch if at all. Ahh, I think the commit message could make this clearer (although it it's somewhat implied). The commit message also lacks a period at the end. But is the conditional correct for x32? It has to be keep using the old macro definitions. _______________________________________________ linux-snps-arc mailing list linux-snps-arc@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-snps-arc