From: "Mukunda,Vijendar" <vijendar.mukunda@amd.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Kai Vehmanen <kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>,
Venkata Prasad Potturu <venkataprasad.potturu@amd.com>,
sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org,
linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
"Dommati, Sunil-kumar" <Sunil-kumar.Dommati@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: amd: fix soundwire dependencies
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 15:45:25 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <0940c052-d834-4ddd-98ac-8395ab48ceb8@amd.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <96f6e105-0e89-429f-a8c5-2e64087d7771@app.fastmail.com>
On 20/02/24 13:51, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024, at 08:54, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote:
>> On 20/02/24 12:40, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024, at 07:23, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote:
>>>> On 20/02/24 11:43, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>>> On Tue, Feb 20, 2024, at 06:57, Mukunda,Vijendar wrote:
>>>>>> On 19/02/24 15:08, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>>>>>> From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
>>>>>>> In normal configs, they should all either be built-in or all loadable
>>>>>>> modules anyway, so this simplification does not limit any real usecases.
>>>>>> Tested this patch. SOUNWIRE_AMD flag is not selected by default causing
>>>>>> AMD SOF driver for ACP 6.3 platform is build without enabling SoundWire.
>>>>> Yes, that is what I described. But as SOUNWIRE_AMD is a user visible
>>>>> symbol, there is no problem in expecting users to enable it when they
>>>>> have this hardware, and distros just enable all the drivers anyway.
>>>> Want to set SOUNDWIRE_AMD flag by default, similar to Intel & Qcom
>>>> platforms instead of explicitly enabling the Kconfig option.
>>> Maybe use 'default SND_SOC_SOF_AMD_TOPLEVEL' then?
>> Didn't get your point.
>>
>> Even with the current patch, if we select 'SOUNDWIRE_AMD' flag explicitly
>> AMD ACP63 SOF driver Kconfig option is not visible for user configuration.
>> This results in ACP63 SOF driver won't be built at all.
> I don't understand what you mean here. What I see
> in linux-next both with and without my patch is
>
> config SND_SOC_SOF_AMD_ACP63
> tristate "SOF support for ACP6.3 platform"
> depends on SND_SOC_SOF_PCI
>
> so it clearly should be visible as long as SND_SOC_SOF_PCI
> is enabled.
>
> There is still a problem that SND_SOC_SOF_AMD_TOPLEVEL
> can't use my "depends on SOUNDWIRE_AMD || !SOUNDWIRE_AMD"
> trick if SOUNDWIRE_AMD in turn uses
> "default SND_SOC_SOF_AMD_TOPLEVEL", but I don't think you
> meant that, right?
Yes, you are correct.
>
>>> I don't think copying the mistake from the intel driver
>>> is helpful, though I agree it would be nice to be consistent
>>> between them.
>>>
>>> As a general rule, you should not have a Kconfig symbol that
>>> is both user visible and also selected by the drivers that
>>> depend on it.
>>>
>>> To avoid the dependency problems from coming back and keep
>>> the complexity to a minimum, I think there are two logical
>>> ways to handle soundwire:
>>>
>>> a) keep the current drivers/soundwire/Kconfig contents and
>>> change all the 'select SOUNDWIRE_foo' to 'depends on'.
>> Current patch already using 'depends on SOUNDWIRE_AMD" for
>> SND_SOC_SOF_AMD_SOUNDWIRE Kconfig option.
> Correct, because this is the Kconfig option that actually
> controls whether sound/soc/sof/amd/acp-common.c calls into
> the soundwire-amd module.
>
>> Still we couldn't see SND_SOC_SOF_AMD_ACP63 Kconfig option
>> is enabled.
> I need more information here. Do you have additional
> patches on top of what is in today's linux-next?
> I have it enabled on my build here.
Sorry, it's my bad. My local patches created the problem.
Validated patch on our side. It's working fine.
>
> Arnd
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-20 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-19 9:38 [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: amd: fix soundwire dependencies Arnd Bergmann
2024-02-20 5:57 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2024-02-20 6:13 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-02-20 6:23 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2024-02-20 7:10 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-02-20 7:54 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2024-02-20 8:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2024-02-20 10:15 ` Mukunda,Vijendar [this message]
2024-02-20 10:19 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2024-02-21 0:48 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=0940c052-d834-4ddd-98ac-8395ab48ceb8@amd.com \
--to=vijendar.mukunda@amd.com \
--cc=Sunil-kumar.Dommati@amd.com \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.baluta@nxp.com \
--cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sound-open-firmware@alsa-project.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=venkataprasad.potturu@amd.com \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox