Re: [2.6 patch] schedule obsolete OSS drivers for removal

Tomasz Kłoczko
2006-01-04T02:51:09Z

[-- Attachment #1: Type: TEXT/PLAIN, Size: 2898 bytes --]

On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> On Wed, Jan 04, 2006 at 01:46:08AM +0100, Tomasz K?oczko wrote:
>> On Wed, 4 Jan 2006, Adrian Bunk wrote:
>> [..]
>>>> Solaris, AIX ..
>>>> Full list is avalaible in "Operating System" listbox on
>>>> http://www.4front-tech.com/download.cgi
>>>
>>> As I said in footnote 1 of my email, this has little value for
>>> application developers since only few users on these systems use this
>>> commercial sound system.
>>
>> You are wrong using pejorative labeling "commercial sound system" for
>> this. Comercial is implementation. OSS is defined by user space API.
>> This is all what was neccessary on implemting this in for Linux.
>
> The question is simple:
>
> How many percent of the Solaris or AIX users are actually using any
> sound system implementing the OSS API?

First try answer on: if OSS specyfications is complet, easy to use in
applications and generaly compact why reinventing all from this level to
above on Linux ? why ?
If you answer first on this question you will see: answer
on your questions do not have sense.

Be compliant with OSS specyfication allow save many time on applications
development level by consume (in good sense) time spend on this
applications by *BSD, Solaris and other systems developers (even on not
open source applications).
After four years ALSA development quality of sound support in Linux is IMO
on the ~same (still bad) level as four years ago. Still to complicated
but now more bloated and additionaly not ready for handle fancy gadgets
like BT headsets.
On other systems (MOX, Win*, Solaris ..) on handle sound situations is now
better than four years ago. IMO this allow form conclution: generaly
current ALSA is step back compare to other systems and probaly Linux need
some deeper work then simple polishing sound device drivers.

More than year Linux in many publications is described as "excelent
system for mobile gadgets". All waits for this ..
Most of this gadgets want uses sound. Force using ALSA in this are makes
nightmares not only for drivers developers but also for user space
applications developers.

(IMO in comming year or two if nothing will change Linux can be visable
marginalized/can loose current possition .. not because in this period
Linux will be worse compare to now but because other systems like Solaris,
MOX and also Win* can pass in this period better progress on bringing some
valuable functionalities in usable/simpler form for joe-like users ..
remember: sound support in Linux isn't for data centers/big-ass-machines :)

kloczek
--
-----------------------------------------------------------
*Ludzie nie mają problemów, tylko sobie sami je stwarzają*
-----------------------------------------------------------
Tomasz Kłoczko, sys adm @zie.pg.gda.pl|*e-mail: kloczek@rudy.mif.pg.gda.pl*