From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ville Herva Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 08:16:47 +0000 Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] schedule obsolete OSS drivers for removal Message-Id: <20060109081646.GG21365@vianova.fi> List-Id: References: <20060104000344.GJ3831@stusta.de> <20060104010123.GK3831@stusta.de> <20060104113726.3bd7a649@mango.fruits.de> <1136445395.24475.17.camel@mindpipe> <20060105124317.2d12a85c@mango.fruits.de> <1136483330.31583.5.camel@mindpipe> <20060108210756.GD1686@vianova.fi> <1136756669.2997.2.camel@mindpipe> In-Reply-To: <1136756669.2997.2.camel@mindpipe> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Lee Revell Cc: Florian Schmidt , Tomasz =?iso-8859-1?Q?K=B3oczko?= , Adrian Bunk , Jesper Juhl , Takashi Iwai , Olivier Galibert , Alistair John Strachan , Jan Engelhardt , Andi Kleen , perex@suse.cz, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, James@superbug.demon.co.uk, sailer@ife.ee.ethz.ch, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, zab@zabbo.net, kyle@parisc-linux.org, jgarzik@pobox.com, Thorsten Knabe , zwane@commfireservices.com, zaitcev@yahoo.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Jan 08, 2006 at 04:44:28PM -0500, you [Lee Revell] wrote: > > No it's a sign that the Revolution 5.1 is not well supported yet. It > was not supported at all until a few weeks ago. Ok, I see. (It was just that the revo51 changelog entry revo51 was not exactly verbose wrt. what's supported.) You won't need the bug report just yet, then? I'll keep retesting the new releases. -- v -- v@iki.fi