From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Mark Brown Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 11:54:25 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/3] ASoC: codecs: wm8904: add dt ids table Message-Id: <20150115115425.GX3043@sirena.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="6yuPXOSZRpyw7iEV" List-Id: References: <1418614273-2303-1-git-send-email-voice.shen@atmel.com> In-Reply-To: <1418614273-2303-1-git-send-email-voice.shen@atmel.com> To: Bo Shen Cc: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, devicetree@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Morozov --6yuPXOSZRpyw7iEV Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:31:11AM +0800, Bo Shen wrote: > +#ifdef CONFIG_OF > +static enum wm8904_type wm8904_data = WM8904; > +static enum wm8904_type wm8912_data = WM8912; > + > +static const struct of_device_id wm8904_of_match[] = { > + { > + .compatible = "wlf,wm8904", > + .data = &wm8904_data, Does this end up in the i2c_driver_id driver data or do we need some extra code when devtype is assigned to check for an of_node and look at the DT data instead? That certainly used to be the case... --6yuPXOSZRpyw7iEV Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: Digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJUt6pwAAoJECTWi3JdVIfQh+8H/ib4WL9KSjhvO9zXpnMqeY/X TAJjHOQqTKvXArE068aE33rnHqpCTG1whnbFmVcT7XQE3weP9njbBRSCThLg+w7w Yk+EqB7v3p8CA2moY7+AFLi+427awZLVwxw7i3f0PqwPMLCFB0dcqehZNB+ryYL4 ra+0lBmFsDnUGHuAHRbIcWQ8IDgz2bBNVZzGyKiy4vL4KThAb/HzXiJd1WqFdz26 BcXoGDjKsej3j/2FAK1FYrck5CIxHIfqwS9ujMuoNUphXqiV6F+FoMI2mylvkE+x 64barcbq5zlR8SajQ8accrPLzTQ07/aAYgPCBkBfjOpbe7Li+4J/G+zuAfnsIx8= =T1j7 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --6yuPXOSZRpyw7iEV--