From: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
To: broonie@kernel.org
Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org,
tiwai@suse.com, perex@perex.cz,
amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com,
pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com, hdegoede@redhat.com,
Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/5] ASoC: topology: Do not ignore route checks when parsing graphs
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2024 10:04:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240308090502.2136760-3-cezary.rojewski@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240308090502.2136760-1-cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
One of the framework responsibilities is to ensure that the enumerated
DPCMs are valid i.e.: a valid BE is connected to a valid FE DAI. While
the are checks in soc-core.c and soc-pcm.c that verify this, a component
driver may attempt to workaround this by loading an invalid graph
through the topology file.
Be strict and fail topology loading when invalid graph is encountered.
Signed-off-by: Cezary Rojewski <cezary.rojewski@intel.com>
---
sound/soc/soc-topology.c | 11 +++++++++--
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c
index d6d368837235..90ca37e008b3 100644
--- a/sound/soc/soc-topology.c
+++ b/sound/soc/soc-topology.c
@@ -1083,8 +1083,15 @@ static int soc_tplg_dapm_graph_elems_load(struct soc_tplg *tplg,
break;
}
- /* add route, but keep going if some fail */
- snd_soc_dapm_add_routes(dapm, route, 1);
+ ret = snd_soc_dapm_add_routes(dapm, route, 1);
+ if (ret) {
+ if (!dapm->card->disable_route_checks) {
+ dev_err(tplg->dev, "ASoC: dapm_add_routes failed: %d\n", ret);
+ break;
+ }
+ dev_info(tplg->dev,
+ "ASoC: disable_route_checks set, ignoring dapm_add_routes errors\n");
+ }
}
return ret;
--
2.25.1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-03-08 9:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-08 9:04 [PATCH v2 0/5] ASoC: Harden DAPM route checks and Intel fixes Cezary Rojewski
2024-03-08 9:04 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] ASoC: Intel: Disable route checks for Skylake boards Cezary Rojewski
2024-03-23 1:42 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2024-03-08 9:04 ` Cezary Rojewski [this message]
2024-03-23 1:42 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] ASoC: topology: Do not ignore route checks when parsing graphs Pierre-Louis Bossart
2024-03-08 9:05 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] ASoC: Intel: avs: ssm4567: Do not ignore route checks Cezary Rojewski
2024-03-08 9:05 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] ASoC: Intel: avs: ssm4567: Board cleanup Cezary Rojewski
2024-03-08 9:05 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] ASoC: Intel: avs: i2s_test: Remove redundant dapm routes Cezary Rojewski
2024-03-26 15:27 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] ASoC: Harden DAPM route checks and Intel fixes Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240308090502.2136760-3-cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
--to=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=amadeuszx.slawinski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox