From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
To: lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org
Cc: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com,
ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com,
yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com, pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: ipc4-pcm: Move out be_rate initialization from for loop in fixup
Date: Thu, 6 Feb 2025 11:49:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250206094914.21135-1-peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Instead of initializing the be_rate within the loop by checking i == 0 at
each iteration, move the be_rate reference initialization from the loop.
For BE single rate check we will have single comparison done at each
iteration compared to two in case the num_input_formats were higher than 1.
We still need to run the loop from index 0 to check for FE-BE rate match.
The patch also fixes bogus reports from gcc static analyzer thinking that
be_rate is used uninitialized later in the function (which was not true).
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
---
sound/soc/sof/ipc4-pcm.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/ipc4-pcm.c b/sound/soc/sof/ipc4-pcm.c
index 18fff2df76f9..dc05e7490e6d 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sof/ipc4-pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sof/ipc4-pcm.c
@@ -610,12 +610,11 @@ static int sof_ipc4_pcm_dai_link_fixup_rate(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev,
* Copier does not change sampling rate, so we
* need to only consider the input pin information.
*/
+ be_rate = pin_fmts[0].audio_fmt.sampling_frequency;
for (i = 0; i < num_input_formats; i++) {
unsigned int val = pin_fmts[i].audio_fmt.sampling_frequency;
- if (i == 0)
- be_rate = val;
- else if (val != be_rate)
+ if (val != be_rate)
single_be_rate = false;
if (val == fe_rate) {
--
2.48.1
next reply other threads:[~2025-02-06 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-02-06 9:49 Peter Ujfalusi [this message]
2025-02-06 20:44 ` [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: ipc4-pcm: Move out be_rate initialization from for loop in fixup Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250206094914.21135-1-peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
--to=peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev \
--cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox