From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
To: lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org
Cc: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com,
ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com,
yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com, pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev
Subject: [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: ipc4-pcm: Look for best matching hw_config for SSP
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2025 13:26:57 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250619102657.12109-1-peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> (raw)
Instead of just looking for a hw_config with matching rate only it sounds
better to try to find the best matching configuration.
If we have multiple hw_configurations with the same rate, but each with
different format for example then we have been picking the first config
with the matching rate, which can be a problem and it wil depend on how
the configs are ordered.
Instead we should be trying to find the best match out of the configs
1. rate + format + channels are matching
2. rate + format are matching
3. rate matching
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
---
sound/soc/sof/ipc4-pcm.c | 61 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/ipc4-pcm.c b/sound/soc/sof/ipc4-pcm.c
index 8eee3e1aadf9..a5b365ab1945 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sof/ipc4-pcm.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sof/ipc4-pcm.c
@@ -557,12 +557,15 @@ static int sof_ipc4_pcm_hw_free(struct snd_soc_component *component,
return sof_ipc4_trigger_pipelines(component, substream, SOF_IPC4_PIPE_RESET, 0);
}
-static void ipc4_ssp_dai_config_pcm_params_match(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, const char *link_name,
- struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params)
+static int ipc4_ssp_dai_config_pcm_params_match(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev,
+ const char *link_name,
+ struct snd_pcm_hw_params *params)
{
struct snd_sof_dai_link *slink;
struct snd_sof_dai *dai;
bool dai_link_found = false;
+ int current_config = -1;
+ bool partial_match;
int i;
list_for_each_entry(slink, &sdev->dai_link_list, list) {
@@ -573,19 +576,50 @@ static void ipc4_ssp_dai_config_pcm_params_match(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, const
}
if (!dai_link_found)
- return;
+ return 0;
+ /*
+ * Find the first best matching hardware config:
+ * rate + format + channels are matching
+ * rate + channel are matching
+ *
+ * The copier cannot do rate and/or channel conversion.
+ */
for (i = 0; i < slink->num_hw_configs; i++) {
struct snd_soc_tplg_hw_config *hw_config = &slink->hw_configs[i];
- if (params_rate(params) == le32_to_cpu(hw_config->fsync_rate)) {
- /* set current config for all DAI's with matching name */
- list_for_each_entry(dai, &sdev->dai_list, list)
- if (!strcmp(slink->link->name, dai->name))
- dai->current_config = le32_to_cpu(hw_config->id);
+ if (params_rate(params) == le32_to_cpu(hw_config->fsync_rate) &&
+ params_width(params) == le32_to_cpu(hw_config->tdm_slot_width) &&
+ params_channels(params) == le32_to_cpu(hw_config->tdm_slots)) {
+ current_config = le32_to_cpu(hw_config->id);
+ partial_match = false;
+ /* best match found */
break;
+ } else if (current_config < 0 &&
+ params_rate(params) == le32_to_cpu(hw_config->fsync_rate) &&
+ params_channels(params) == le32_to_cpu(hw_config->tdm_slots)) {
+ current_config = le32_to_cpu(hw_config->id);
+ partial_match = true;
+ /* keep looking for better match */
}
}
+
+ if (current_config < 0) {
+ dev_err(sdev->dev,
+ "%s: No suitable hw_config found for %s (num_hw_configs: %d)\n",
+ __func__, slink->link->name, slink->num_hw_configs);
+ return -EINVAL;
+ }
+
+ dev_dbg(sdev->dev,
+ "hw_config for %s: %d (num_hw_configs: %d) with %s match\n",
+ slink->link->name, current_config, slink->num_hw_configs,
+ partial_match ? "partial" : "full");
+ list_for_each_entry(dai, &sdev->dai_list, list)
+ if (!strcmp(slink->link->name, dai->name))
+ dai->current_config = current_config;
+
+ return 0;
}
/*
@@ -728,13 +762,10 @@ static int sof_ipc4_pcm_dai_link_fixup(struct snd_soc_pcm_runtime *rtd,
break;
}
- switch (ipc4_copier->dai_type) {
- case SOF_DAI_INTEL_SSP:
- ipc4_ssp_dai_config_pcm_params_match(sdev, (char *)rtd->dai_link->name, params);
- break;
- default:
- break;
- }
+ if (ipc4_copier->dai_type == SOF_DAI_INTEL_SSP)
+ return ipc4_ssp_dai_config_pcm_params_match(sdev,
+ (char *)rtd->dai_link->name,
+ params);
return 0;
}
--
2.49.0
next reply other threads:[~2025-06-19 10:26 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-19 10:26 Peter Ujfalusi [this message]
2025-06-20 10:23 ` [PATCH] ASoC: SOF: ipc4-pcm: Look for best matching hw_config for SSP Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250619102657.12109-1-peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
--to=peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev \
--cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox