From: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
To: lgirdwood@gmail.com, broonie@kernel.org
Cc: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com,
ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com,
yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com, pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev,
daniel.baluta@nxp.com
Subject: [PATCH 7/7] ASoC: SOF: ipc/ops: Use guard() for spinlocks
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 12:10:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260112101004.7648-8-peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260112101004.7648-1-peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Replace the manual spinlock lock/unlock pairs with guard().
Only code refactoring, and no behavior change.
Signed-off-by: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>
Reviewed-by: Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com>
---
sound/soc/sof/ipc.c | 4 +---
sound/soc/sof/ops.c | 34 +++++++---------------------------
2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 30 deletions(-)
diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/ipc.c b/sound/soc/sof/ipc.c
index 3fdeb07bafa3..e6d8894b8ef6 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sof/ipc.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sof/ipc.c
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ int sof_ipc_send_msg(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, void *msg_data, size_t msg_bytes,
* The spin-lock is needed to protect message objects against other
* atomic contexts.
*/
- spin_lock_irq(&sdev->ipc_lock);
+ guard(spinlock_irq)(&sdev->ipc_lock);
/* initialise the message */
msg = &ipc->msg;
@@ -66,8 +66,6 @@ int sof_ipc_send_msg(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, void *msg_data, size_t msg_bytes,
if (!ret)
msg->ipc_complete = false;
- spin_unlock_irq(&sdev->ipc_lock);
-
return ret;
}
diff --git a/sound/soc/sof/ops.c b/sound/soc/sof/ops.c
index bd52e7ec6883..74c04dcf4167 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sof/ops.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sof/ops.c
@@ -38,13 +38,8 @@ bool snd_sof_pci_update_bits_unlocked(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, u32 offset,
bool snd_sof_pci_update_bits(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, u32 offset,
u32 mask, u32 value)
{
- unsigned long flags;
- bool change;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&sdev->hw_lock, flags);
- change = snd_sof_pci_update_bits_unlocked(sdev, offset, mask, value);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sdev->hw_lock, flags);
- return change;
+ guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&sdev->hw_lock);
+ return snd_sof_pci_update_bits_unlocked(sdev, offset, mask, value);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(snd_sof_pci_update_bits);
@@ -90,28 +85,16 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(snd_sof_dsp_update_bits64_unlocked);
bool snd_sof_dsp_update_bits(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, u32 bar, u32 offset,
u32 mask, u32 value)
{
- unsigned long flags;
- bool change;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&sdev->hw_lock, flags);
- change = snd_sof_dsp_update_bits_unlocked(sdev, bar, offset, mask,
- value);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sdev->hw_lock, flags);
- return change;
+ guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&sdev->hw_lock);
+ return snd_sof_dsp_update_bits_unlocked(sdev, bar, offset, mask, value);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(snd_sof_dsp_update_bits);
bool snd_sof_dsp_update_bits64(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, u32 bar, u32 offset,
u64 mask, u64 value)
{
- unsigned long flags;
- bool change;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&sdev->hw_lock, flags);
- change = snd_sof_dsp_update_bits64_unlocked(sdev, bar, offset, mask,
- value);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sdev->hw_lock, flags);
- return change;
+ guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&sdev->hw_lock);
+ return snd_sof_dsp_update_bits64_unlocked(sdev, bar, offset, mask, value);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(snd_sof_dsp_update_bits64);
@@ -134,11 +117,8 @@ void snd_sof_dsp_update_bits_forced_unlocked(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, u32 bar,
void snd_sof_dsp_update_bits_forced(struct snd_sof_dev *sdev, u32 bar,
u32 offset, u32 mask, u32 value)
{
- unsigned long flags;
-
- spin_lock_irqsave(&sdev->hw_lock, flags);
+ guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&sdev->hw_lock);
snd_sof_dsp_update_bits_forced_unlocked(sdev, bar, offset, mask, value);
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(&sdev->hw_lock, flags);
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(snd_sof_dsp_update_bits_forced);
--
2.52.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-12 10:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-12 10:09 [PATCH 0/7] ASoC: SOF: Use guard()/scoped_guard() for locks when makes sense Peter Ujfalusi
2026-01-12 10:09 ` [PATCH 1/7] ASoC: SOF: Use guard()/scoped_guard() for mutex locks where it " Peter Ujfalusi
2026-01-12 10:09 ` [PATCH 2/7] ASoC: SOF: Intel: " Peter Ujfalusi
2026-01-12 10:10 ` [PATCH 3/7] ASoC: SOF: amd: acp-ipc: Use guard() for spinlock_irq() Peter Ujfalusi
2026-01-12 10:10 ` [PATCH 4/7] ASoC: SOF: imx: imx-common: Use guard() for spinlock_irqsafe() Peter Ujfalusi
2026-01-12 10:10 ` [PATCH 5/7] ASoC: SOF: mediatek: mtk-adsp-common: Use guard() for spinlock_irqsave Peter Ujfalusi
2026-01-12 10:10 ` [PATCH 6/7] ASoC: SOF: Intel: Use guard() for spinlocks where it makes sense Peter Ujfalusi
2026-01-12 10:10 ` Peter Ujfalusi [this message]
2026-01-13 13:49 ` [PATCH 0/7] ASoC: SOF: Use guard()/scoped_guard() for locks when " Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260112101004.7648-8-peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
--to=peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.baluta@nxp.com \
--cc=kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev \
--cc=ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox