[PATCH v2] ASoC: sdw_utils: Remove dead code in asoc_sdw_ti_add_tac5xx2_routes()

[Niranjan H Y <niranjan.hy@ti.com>]

Remove unnecessary checks for scnprintf() return values in
asoc_sdw_ti_add_tac5xx2_routes(). The function scnprintf() never
returns negative values and cannot return zero given the format
strings used ("%s SPK_L" and "%s SPK_R").

The existing length validation at line 110 already ensures that
name_prefix won't cause buffer overflow, and scnprintf() guarantees
null-termination even in case of truncation.

Fixes: e812de61e9a0 ("ASoC: sdw_utils: TI amp utility for tac5xx2 family")
Reported-by: Dan Carpenter <error27@gmail.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-sound/agF8GBcHYUaGJbXY@stanley.mountain/
Signed-off-by: Niranjan H Y <niranjan.hy@ti.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- update Reported-by with correct email id.
---
 sound/soc/sdw_utils/soc_sdw_ti_amp.c | 10 ++--------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/sound/soc/sdw_utils/soc_sdw_ti_amp.c b/sound/soc/sdw_utils/soc_sdw_ti_amp.c
index f156116fbeb..d0ae5d7efe8 100644
--- a/sound/soc/sdw_utils/soc_sdw_ti_amp.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sdw_utils/soc_sdw_ti_amp.c
@@ -105,18 +105,12 @@ static int asoc_sdw_ti_add_tac5xx2_routes(struct snd_soc_dapm_context *dapm,
 	struct snd_soc_dapm_route routes[2];
 	char left_widget[TAC5XX2_WIDGET_NAME_MAX];
 	char right_widget[TAC5XX2_WIDGET_NAME_MAX];
-	int ret;
 
 	if (strlen(name_prefix) > (TAC5XX2_WIDGET_NAME_MAX - 7))
 		return -ENAMETOOLONG;
 
-	ret = scnprintf(left_widget, sizeof(left_widget), "%s SPK_L", name_prefix);
-	if (ret <= 0)
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	ret = scnprintf(right_widget, sizeof(right_widget), "%s SPK_R", name_prefix);
-	if (ret <= 0)
-		return -EINVAL;
+	scnprintf(left_widget, sizeof(left_widget), "%s SPK_L", name_prefix);
+	scnprintf(right_widget, sizeof(right_widget), "%s SPK_R", name_prefix);
 
 	routes[0] = (struct snd_soc_dapm_route){"Left Spk", NULL, left_widget};
 	routes[1] = (struct snd_soc_dapm_route){"Right Spk", NULL, right_widget};
-- 
2.34.1