From: Sergey Lebedev <lsa.uz@pm.me>
To: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, Jaroslav Kysela <perex@perex.cz>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.com>
Cc: Bard Liao <bard.liao@intel.com>,
Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>,
Amaan Lalani <zlzzm2014@outlook.com>,
linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] soundwire: dmi-quirks: drop the ghost RT1320 on the Surface Pro 11 (Intel)
Date: Sun, 30 Aug 2026 21:12:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260830211203.50752-1-lsa.uz@pm.me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260830151516.44629-3-lsa.uz@pm.me>
A second Surface Pro 11 (Intel) has reproduced the ghost independently and
confirms this patch removes it. The report is from leihua-dev on the
linux-surface tracker; I am relaying it here because it is a different unit with
a different BIOS from mine, and because this series has had no review of the code
since 2026-08-05.
Unit: Surface Pro for Business 11th Edition with Intel, SKU
Surface_Pro_11th_Edition_With_Intel_For_Business_2103, Core Ultra 7 266V, BIOS
17.100.143. Mine is the same SKU with a Core Ultra 7 268V and a different BIOS.
Before the quirk, both _ADRs present and ACPI enumerating each SDCA function
twice:
acpi device:28: find_sdca_function: SDCA function SmartMic (type 3) at 0x2
acpi device:29: find_sdca_function: SDCA function SmartAmp (type 1) at 0x4
acpi device:2b: find_sdca_function: SDCA function SmartMic (type 3) at 0x2
acpi device:2c: find_sdca_function: SDCA function SmartAmp (type 1) at 0x4
with sdw:0:0:025d:1320:00 permanently UNATTACHED. After the patch only the
2b/2c pair remains.
Their DMI_PRODUCT_SKU matches the quirk key exactly. That is the evidence I did
not have when I chose SKU over product-name matching in v2 — at the time it was
one machine and an argument.
Two limits on the report, stated so nobody has to discover them:
- They run a 6.18 tree, so the dmi-quirks.c hunk was context-adapted; that
branch has no ghost_realtek table yet. The logic is unchanged.
- They applied five changes at once and did not bisect. That does not weaken
this patch specifically: the duplicate _ADR and the doubled enumeration are
both observable before any topology loads, and their before/after shows them
changing.
Full report, with their kernel and userspace versions:
https://github.com/linux-surface/linux-surface/issues/1876#issuecomment-5470909030
Separately, one hazard that surfaced in the same comparison and may be worth
knowing on the list. Backporting a machine entry whose .sof_tplg_filename names a
dummy topology onto a pre-6.19 kernel yields no sound card at all — probe fails
with -ENOENT before anything registers, speakers included — because
225d70b80745 ("ASoC: SOF: don't check the existence of dummy topology") is not
there to skip the existence check. Upstream is fine: sof_test_topology_file()
tests the name and has no idea where the name came from, so from 6.19 a machine
entry and the generic path are treated alike. It is purely a backport hazard, and
it cost that reporter a boot with no audio at all.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-30 21:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-30 15:15 [PATCH v3 0/2] ASoC: fix audio on the Microsoft Surface Pro 11 (Intel) Sergey Lebedev
2026-08-30 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] ASoC: rt1320: run the initialisation preset on the first hardware init Sergey Lebedev
2026-08-30 15:15 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] soundwire: dmi-quirks: drop the ghost RT1320 on the Surface Pro 11 (Intel) Sergey Lebedev
2026-08-30 21:12 ` Sergey Lebedev [this message]
2026-09-04 7:51 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2026-09-04 12:36 ` Sergey Lebedev
2026-09-04 14:09 ` Pierre-Louis Bossart
2026-09-04 15:10 ` Sergey Lebedev
2026-08-30 17:47 ` [PATCH v3 0/2] ASoC: fix audio on the Microsoft " Sergey Lebedev
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260830211203.50752-1-lsa.uz@pm.me \
--to=lsa.uz@pm.me \
--cc=bard.liao@intel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
--cc=zlzzm2014@outlook.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox