From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-182.mta1.migadu.com (out-182.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.182]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFE72194C98 for ; Thu, 7 May 2026 01:46:50 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.182 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778118414; cv=none; b=P02Cc1j0JrZCL3jqLQE8ktSryWrKbl1Hc+wW2ORvXyniNoRhYMofHP+8i4P3pVQH+X1lORIseJ15BhmKtMz8vYPkriSk2tJrKMeV7iCoMZn8xJRs/y0jXOo+fUBGqX0buwe6RVxzSESc0pNv3zzD8vLyVTXKwkzkANTpv24vrmc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778118414; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ptahMHxAwcMzgJUkdJAwL9Np/nYEs8gByqgKb70ZGU4=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=jJWGnlD5I+Sxkj3RDOVeYIFfjo+49w5c+043Cy7DZk2doBSAqDXVdhQBc8BNbVzwEshyygjYg/dzTu/PIzNEIZ/ru1IAxUq40cvLOIdrBm0xrrbFPQKZ++e0fo91AaVy+onwF7wTOTyT8MdvRw3olA1+T/CKp+Tyl53sQ3lQ/s4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=packett.cool; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=packett.cool; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=packett.cool header.i=@packett.cool header.b=e/t0Bw0e; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.182 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=packett.cool Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=packett.cool Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=packett.cool header.i=@packett.cool header.b="e/t0Bw0e" Message-ID: <35b45fd0-fffb-455b-b19d-5c29cc955563@packett.cool> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=packett.cool; s=key1; t=1778118408; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2lk0xUHftJD0rJZhHZIYmoYd2dWXW26635MabL0+A0s=; b=e/t0Bw0eH/FG81UNZB8PXX5CTv8G5YfwI473WJ6VQD5RryLVhi1MV/jgZAWcoWxlvxF8G7 jTnsQzrJqpZwoMpyUabou0hxvPpdvwwXinacY0Eqgv/KGVsvG459eUmpjGgrcpsJpbbxqb UynFV0PS4+j+bHPupsbc2OQX8Whlaixhr9Ba8FfhA+8lS1rOJ45tqjJnHhvDEKH87dtc8w ID3vI7O5T29NVDel+rmtmVeIYbtjMmJmDVVwM0uczjeeYiNH7yVguVW7hNSm8PPUjqlt1p nqZbtFz/AVb6go4LZDV2aUwyV9TUqI3jCDw+/VaPqOq7di2UcNzbMG8lMomlVw== Date: Wed, 6 May 2026 22:46:33 -0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/6] ASoC: qcom: qdsp6: q6afe: fix clk vote response type mismatch To: Mark Brown Cc: Srinivas Kandagatla , Liam Girdwood , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , Srinivas Kandagatla , Bhushan Shah , Luca Weiss , Antoine Bernard , ~postmarketos/upstreaming@lists.sr.ht, phone-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org References: <20260506204142.659778-1-val@packett.cool> <20260506204142.659778-2-val@packett.cool> Content-Language: en-US X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Val Packett In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT On 5/6/26 9:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, May 06, 2026 at 05:33:02PM -0300, Val Packett wrote: >> The response sent by the firmware when requesting a clock vote (opcode >> AFE_CMD_RSP_REMOTE_LPASS_CORE_HW_VOTE_REQUEST) does not actually have >> the same opcode + status payload as APR_BASIC_RSP_RESULT. Rather, it >> returns one single u32 which is the client_handle that must be used in >> future unvote requests for the same clock. > Please send cover letters for your serieses, it helps tooling. Please > also supply inter version changelogs. ummm: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260506204142.659778-1-val@packett.cool/ I even Cc'd all(?) the lists, as usual.. Oh, sorry- not stable@ I guess. I didn't even realize the Cc from the sign-off section would actually immediately be used by git send-email, I thought it would only get sent to stable when merged. ~val