From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BABDD2EA14A for ; Wed, 3 Sep 2025 11:02:42 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756897364; cv=none; b=N9xzbmOQI5mNDpIybPN6Vl55arN1DWr+ihAzKADVLEnxPnK4B/SM0jHBPrwqymP7Npru1Y8RqKXxyeMR4yVzDpzqfxvnOnH3Gn0KUrxflgGPiHrcNJ0VfCHB7nkY2aXoZI1xZRCL1uiYelMnaIFKiQDSU60N/L5Mj0JwWtK1Q6Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756897364; c=relaxed/simple; bh=34hEZV7N1ziFUgW+/FnL8RnkEjqzCOf3XpT+3kC3pbg=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=nVheCUIrjkzkEvD3ChDaHNhSd4k7GkY5Qk5cnriCPoulhjErHml4xUeZHObEmckMmlZuCaJD8wdHLiQ5J12b3nAqYwKkQM3WLAQ2YY1WwX6RWU2YaTX46+TeaCL7DnJexxmHz5w1UAVVaaJpdsvB+5jsZ2pXmVxVNaiin3m8Mj4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=I5p2/y8c; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="I5p2/y8c" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1756897363; x=1788433363; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=34hEZV7N1ziFUgW+/FnL8RnkEjqzCOf3XpT+3kC3pbg=; b=I5p2/y8c+HgzNlVsZlbHDNxcQ1IcS7ORuTf9NZKsSK8ccK2pnkpPtdwn AOZdxK1mcCt1tguZls/79QsxjErkyNEyuITeFX0hdoJ2UeQi3AqtYU8Uj iwli50BhfhFH7IqeUBHNzQZCqCW7EsdzuFnccqkKqieaQf4I0lsLeqHVs /BSl0GtKFKpB7WTV+E1c96et4I2F6S2LSH/WI/3aaDfHZWklifG2ayCsC tZgUKpLDap5TcL9k7j7fU5W0mwHiAFf/c3i7AQuaqYBF/SjPmZWVih4Ep dJDPNzgYCgXr4ZV/zWvj/6Cx9LVsKIwuCEVJXNLRG78rM2vnQCISjh1fb A==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 5ccLY2PfQkmNq8Sy0UII6g== X-CSE-MsgGUID: xaAmb/ECQHCo6ck5TZl4eA== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11541"; a="70584083" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,235,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="70584083" Received: from fmviesa001.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.141]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Sep 2025 04:02:42 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: ndAfCAvHRm2fpAwIXsJLQw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: 9sozycEpSTe6Pcurc1GihA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,235,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="202513475" Received: from sbockowx-mobl2.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.94.8.84]) ([10.94.8.84]) by smtpauth.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Sep 2025 04:02:39 -0700 Message-ID: <44bef157-1582-4b7c-b3cc-aa4511477418@linux.intel.com> Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2025 13:02:24 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/17] ASoC: Intel: avs: Adjust platform names To: Mark Brown , Cezary Rojewski Cc: tiwai@suse.com, perex@perex.cz, nathan@kernel.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org References: <20250902094853.1231842-1-cezary.rojewski@intel.com> <112981f8-9828-409d-8015-1b1fcd390343@sirena.org.uk> Content-Language: en-US From: =?UTF-8?Q?Amadeusz_S=C5=82awi=C5=84ski?= In-Reply-To: <112981f8-9828-409d-8015-1b1fcd390343@sirena.org.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 2025-09-03 12:58, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, Sep 02, 2025 at 11:48:36AM +0200, Cezary Rojewski wrote: >> This series is a direct follow up to the recent >> machine-board-registration changes [1]. Initially, a number of smaller >> patchsets were part of a bigger block of changes. My attempt to split >> them up to make the review easier was unfortunately not successful [2]. > > Amadeusz, are you OK with these changes? Yes, I'm fine with them. Reviewed-by: Amadeusz Sławiński