From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bo Shen Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 06:30:08 +0000 Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 1/3] ARM: at91: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl support Message-Id: <50A33A70.1030705@atmel.com> List-Id: References: <1352706028-750-1-git-send-email-voice.shen@atmel.com> <1352706028-750-2-git-send-email-voice.shen@atmel.com> <20121113085052.GR18224@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> In-Reply-To: <20121113085052.GR18224-yzvPICuk2AATkU/dhu1WVueM+bqZidxxQQ4Iyu8u01E@public.gmane.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Mark Brown Cc: alsa-devel-K7yf7f+aM1XWsZ/bQMPhNw@public.gmane.org, devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org, linux-sound-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org Hi Mark, On 11/13/2012 16:50, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 03:40:25PM +0800, Bo Shen wrote: > >> + ssc0 { >> + pinctrl_ssc0_tx: ssc0_tx-0 { >> + atmel,pins >> + <1 16 0x1 0x1 /* PB16 periph A with pull up */ >> + 1 17 0x1 0x1 /* PB17 periph A with pull up */ >> + 1 18 0x1 0x1>; /* PB18 periph A with pull up */ >> + }; > > Do we really want the pull ups here? Normally CMOS devices don't have > pulls, or the pulls are disabled during normal operation, as otherwise > when the logic level is different to whatever the pull is doing power is > wasted driving against the resistor. After checking with internal, it does not need pull up. I will correct this in next version. Thanks. Best Regards, Bo Shen