From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bo Shen Date: Fri, 16 Nov 2012 06:33:50 +0000 Subject: Re: [Resend v6 PATCH 2/2] ASoC: atmel-ssc: add pinctrl consumer Message-Id: <50A5DE4E.80206@atmel.com> List-Id: References: <1353045837-19474-1-git-send-email-voice.shen@atmel.com> <1353045837-19474-2-git-send-email-voice.shen@atmel.com> <20121116061250.GP4387@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> In-Reply-To: <20121116061250.GP4387@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Mark Brown Cc: plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, nicolas.ferre@atmel.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org Hi Mark, On 11/16/2012 14:12, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 02:03:57PM +0800, Bo Shen wrote: >> Add pinctrl consumer for atmel ssc peripheral >> >> Signed-off-by: Bo Shen >> --- >> Resend: >> Split one patch into two. >> - one add pinctrl nodes >> - one add pinctrl consumer > > No, this isn't what was meant - the idea is to send only the addition of > pinctrl data as one patch, based off the ASoC branch instead of -next. What is the pinctrl data? (This patch can be applied on sound/topic/atmel branch without any conflicts) The other one add pinctrl nodes, must based on -next, or else I don't know where should I add the pinctrl nodes. Best Regards, Bo Shen