From: Mario Limonciello <superm1@kernel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
Cc: "Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Alex Deucher" <alexander.deucher@amd.com>,
"Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com>,
"David Airlie" <airlied@gmail.com>,
"Simona Vetter" <simona@ffwll.ch>,
"Lukas Wunner" <lukas@wunner.de>,
"Maarten Lankhorst" <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com>,
"Maxime Ripard" <mripard@kernel.org>,
"Thomas Zimmermann" <tzimmermann@suse.de>,
"David Woodhouse" <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"Lu Baolu" <baolu.lu@linux.intel.com>,
"Joerg Roedel" <joro@8bytes.org>, "Will Deacon" <will@kernel.org>,
"Robin Murphy" <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"Jaroslav Kysela" <perex@perex.cz>,
"Takashi Iwai" <tiwai@suse.com>,
"open list:DRM DRIVERS" <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>,
"open list" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:INTEL IOMMU (VT-d)" <iommu@lists.linux.dev>,
"open list:PCI SUBSYSTEM" <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:VFIO DRIVER" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"open list:SOUND" <linux-sound@vger.kernel.org>,
"Daniel Dadap" <ddadap@nvidia.com>,
"Mario Limonciello" <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] PCI: Add a new 'boot_display' attribute
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2025 18:33:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <5cc01163-1feb-4a18-8060-27f4da39b2e4@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250626214721.GA1642412@bhelgaas>
On 6/26/25 4:47 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 26, 2025 at 04:12:21PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>> On 6/26/2025 3:45 PM, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jun 24, 2025 at 03:30:42PM -0500, Mario Limonciello wrote:
>>>> From: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>>>>
>>>> On systems with multiple GPUs there can be uncertainty which GPU is the
>>>> primary one used to drive the display at bootup. In order to disambiguate
>>>> this add a new sysfs attribute 'boot_display' that uses the output of
>>>> video_is_primary_device() to populate whether a PCI device was used for
>>>> driving the display.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com>
>>>
>>> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>
>>>
>>> Question below.
>>>
>>>> ---
>>>> v4:
>>>> * new patch
>>>> ---
>>>> Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci | 9 +++++++++
>>>> drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>>>> 2 files changed, 23 insertions(+)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci
>>>> index 69f952fffec72..897cfc1b0de0f 100644
>>>> --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci
>>>> +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-bus-pci
>>>> @@ -612,3 +612,12 @@ Description:
>>>> # ls doe_features
>>>> 0001:01 0001:02 doe_discovery
>>>> +
>>>> +What: /sys/bus/pci/devices/.../boot_display
>>>> +Date: October 2025
>>>> +Contact: Linux PCI developers <linux-pci@vger.kernel.org>
>>>> +Description:
>>>> + This file indicates whether the device was used as a boot
>>>> + display. If the device was used as the boot display, the file
>>>> + will contain "1". If the device is a display device but wasn't
>>>> + used as a boot display, the file will contain "0".
>>>
>>> Is there a reason to expose this file if it wasn't a boot display
>>> device? Maybe it doesn't need to exist at all unless it contains "1"?
>>
>> I was mostly thinking that it's a handy way for userspace to know whether
>> the kernel even supports this feature. If userspace sees that file on any
>> GPU as it walks a list then it knows it can use that for a hint.
>>
>> But if you would rather it only shows up for the boot display yes it's
>> possible to do I think. It's just more complexity to the visibility lookup
>> to also call video_is_primary_device().
>
> I think for a singleton situation like this it makes more sense to
> only expose the file for one device, not several files where only one
> of them contains "1".
I did an experiment with this but the PCI resources aren't ready at the
time visibility is determined.
So either:
* the sysfs file creation needs to be deferred similar to
pci_create_resource_files() does
or
* call to sysfs_update_group() is needed to recalculate visibility.
>
>>>> diff --git a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
>>>> index 268c69daa4d57..5bbf79b1b953d 100644
>>>> --- a/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
>>>> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci-sysfs.c
>>>> @@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
>>>> #include <linux/msi.h>
>>>> #include <linux/of.h>
>>>> #include <linux/aperture.h>
>>>> +#include <asm/video.h>
>>>> #include "pci.h"
>>>> #ifndef ARCH_PCI_DEV_GROUPS
>>>> @@ -679,6 +680,13 @@ const struct attribute_group *pcibus_groups[] = {
>>>> NULL,
>>>> };
>>>> +static ssize_t boot_display_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>>>> + char *buf)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%u\n", video_is_primary_device(dev));
>>>> +}
>>>> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(boot_display);
>>>> +
>>>> static ssize_t boot_vga_show(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>>>> char *buf)
>>>> {
>>>> @@ -1698,6 +1706,7 @@ late_initcall(pci_sysfs_init);
>>>> static struct attribute *pci_dev_dev_attrs[] = {
>>>> &dev_attr_boot_vga.attr,
>>>> + &dev_attr_boot_display.attr,
>>>> NULL,
>>>> };
>>>> @@ -1710,6 +1719,11 @@ static umode_t pci_dev_attrs_are_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
>>>> if (a == &dev_attr_boot_vga.attr && pci_is_vga(pdev))
>>>> return a->mode;
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_VIDEO
>>>> + if (a == &dev_attr_boot_display.attr && pci_is_display(pdev))
>>>> + return a->mode;
>>>> +#endif
>>>> +
>>>> return 0;
>>>> }
>>>> --
>>>> 2.43.0
>>>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-26 23:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-06-24 20:30 [PATCH v5 0/9] Adjust fbcon console device detection Mario Limonciello
2025-06-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] PCI: Add helper for checking if a PCI device is a display controller Mario Limonciello
2025-06-26 20:43 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-26 21:14 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] vfio/pci: Use pci_is_display() Mario Limonciello
2025-06-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] vga_switcheroo: " Mario Limonciello
2025-06-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] iommu/vt-d: " Mario Limonciello
2025-06-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] ALSA: hda: " Mario Limonciello
2025-06-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] Fix access to video_is_primary_device() when compiled without CONFIG_VIDEO Mario Limonciello
2025-06-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] PCI/VGA: Replace vga_is_firmware_default() with a screen info check Mario Limonciello
2025-06-25 9:38 ` kernel test robot
2025-06-26 20:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] fbcon: Use screen info to find primary device Mario Limonciello
2025-06-24 20:30 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] PCI: Add a new 'boot_display' attribute Mario Limonciello
2025-06-26 20:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-26 21:12 ` Mario Limonciello
2025-06-26 21:47 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2025-06-26 23:33 ` Mario Limonciello [this message]
2025-06-27 16:15 ` Bjorn Helgaas
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=5cc01163-1feb-4a18-8060-27f4da39b2e4@kernel.org \
--to=superm1@kernel.org \
--cc=airlied@gmail.com \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=alexander.deucher@amd.com \
--cc=baolu.lu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=christian.koenig@amd.com \
--cc=ddadap@nvidia.com \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=joro@8bytes.org \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com \
--cc=mario.limonciello@amd.com \
--cc=mripard@kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=simona@ffwll.ch \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=tzimmermann@suse.de \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox