From: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com>
To: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: Intel: byt*: Avoid OOB array read from the map name
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 11:12:56 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <61e9c9b8-9ab1-4b6d-adfe-41848bc6b30c@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250415083144.6588-1-tiwai@suse.de>
Hi Takashi,
On 15-Apr-25 10:31 AM, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> While reading bug reports, I casually stubmled on a UBSAN warning
> about the array OOB access, and this looks like a real bug in ASoC
> Intel driver code. So here is a series of quick fixes for them.
Thank you for your work on this.
If we are going to do this I think we should also try to make
the handling of invalid map values set as quirk consistent
between the drivers. ATM we have:
bytcht_es8316: invalid map does not log anything, behaves as "INTMIC_IN1_MAP"
bytcr_rt5640: invalid map gets logged as an error, but not fixed, behaves as "none"
bytcr_rt5651: invalid map does not log anything, behaves as "DMIC_MAP"
bytcr_wm5102: invalid maps get logged as warn_once, overriden by a default map
Note the "behaves as" leaves out the problematic OOB array access,
this is for the rest of the code.
The above means that your fixes for the bytcht_es8316 and bytcr_rt5651
are not entirely correct since you use a map name of "none" for invalid
values which does not match the behavior.
And for the bytcr_wm5102 code your fixes are not necessary because
it does:
static void log_quirks(struct device *dev)
{
switch (quirk & BYT_WM5102_IN_MAP) {
case BYT_WM5102_INTMIC_IN3L_HSMIC_IN1L:
dev_info_once(dev, "quirk INTMIC_IN3L_HSMIC_IN1L enabled\n");
break;
case BYT_WM5102_INTMIC_IN1L_HSMIC_IN2L:
dev_info_once(dev, "quirk INTMIC_IN1L_HSMIC_IN2L enabled\n");
break;
default:
dev_warn_once(dev, "quirk sets invalid input map: 0x%lx, defaulting to INTMIC_
quirk & BYT_WM5102_IN_MAP);
quirk &= ~BYT_WM5102_IN_MAP;
quirk |= BYT_WM5102_INTMIC_IN3L_HSMIC_IN1L;
break;
}
switch (quirk & BYT_WM5102_OUT_MAP) {
case BYT_WM5102_SPK_SPK_MAP:
dev_info_once(dev, "quirk SPK_SPK_MAP enabled\n");
break;
case BYT_WM5102_SPK_HPOUT2_MAP:
dev_info_once(dev, "quirk SPK_HPOUT2_MAP enabled\n");
break;
default:
dev_warn_once(dev, "quirk sets invalid output map: 0x%lx, defaulting to SPK_SP
quirk & BYT_WM5102_OUT_MAP);
quirk &= ~BYT_WM5102_OUT_MAP;
quirk |= BYT_WM5102_SPK_SPK_MAP;
break;
}
...
}
and log_quirks() gets called before using FIELD_GET(BYT_WM5102_OUT_MAP, quirk) /
FIELD_GET(BYT_WM5102_IN_MAP, quirk) as array indexes.
IMHO it would be best to drop patch 4/4 and for the other 3 machine
drivers I would prefer to instead modify their log_quirks() to be like
the bytcr_wm5102 code both for consistency and so that the behavior
of the code is guaranteed to match the map-name from the array.
Regards,
Hans
> ====
>
> Takashi Iwai (4):
> ASoC: Intel: bytcht_es8316: Avoid OOB array read from the map name
> ASoC: Intel: bytcr_rt5640: Avoid OOB array read from the map name
> ASoC: Intel: bytcr_rt5651: Avoid OOB array read from the map name
> ASoC: Intel: bytcr_wm5102: Avoid OOB array read from the map name
>
> sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcht_es8316.c | 11 ++++++++---
> sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5640.c | 11 ++++++++---
> sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_rt5651.c | 11 ++++++++---
> sound/soc/intel/boards/bytcr_wm5102.c | 27 ++++++++++++++++++++------
> 4 files changed, 45 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-04-15 9:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-15 8:31 [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: Intel: byt*: Avoid OOB array read from the map name Takashi Iwai
2025-04-15 8:31 ` [PATCH 1/4] ASoC: Intel: bytcht_es8316: " Takashi Iwai
2025-04-15 8:31 ` [PATCH 2/4] ASoC: Intel: bytcr_rt5640: " Takashi Iwai
2025-04-15 8:31 ` [PATCH 3/4] ASoC: Intel: bytcr_rt5651: " Takashi Iwai
2025-04-15 8:31 ` [PATCH 4/4] ASoC: Intel: bytcr_wm5102: " Takashi Iwai
2025-04-15 9:12 ` Hans de Goede [this message]
2025-04-23 11:47 ` [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: Intel: byt*: " Takashi Iwai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=61e9c9b8-9ab1-4b6d-adfe-41848bc6b30c@redhat.com \
--to=hdegoede@redhat.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox