From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr (pegase1.c-s.fr [93.17.236.30]) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CE9F18035; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 10:20:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=93.17.236.30 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749464441; cv=none; b=SMt4632qbop0j1grP88Qq5Fm90XF22lmRBIwzea4BYFUgVGEsKmwWJS26ZlmVnRTL6pp/DkW1x8WcsF8ALx8LFqZquTOOzMrcuIukYOZkbyndNLrOlTvJvTYm4IraAmq/NRC/fpdOLV4/v4ihxxpKXUUBJqk+N79kIdeEwyOBm0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1749464441; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ArEQ/2nsEBAtXmpn4zBP2QfXDUFWWBM+qfF11borbxI=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=pO9uB+d3v3Oi2WuinH6dzc0MIdepbTg/RtRGl2PVXrIp1f2oTrZhf4Y6E/4AilQ7xqspNcY6swX5NXUMSUpHeEQ59/nwTSQtrJVAX46KM+6+eR7itbScBY6G/hXUOxinABaUkirJo76r3/R8ftsW/mDaw85DqaDcBDFyzgCHTwA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=csgroup.eu; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=csgroup.eu; arc=none smtp.client-ip=93.17.236.30 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=csgroup.eu Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=csgroup.eu Received: from localhost (mailhub3.si.c-s.fr [192.168.12.233]) by localhost (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4bG6sP4M6zz9sTD; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 12:02:01 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from pegase1.c-s.fr ([192.168.12.234]) by localhost (pegase1.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9TNlJkUIjdtp; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 12:02:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [192.168.25.192]) by pegase1.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4bG6sP3W12z9sN6; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 12:02:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id 725B08B764; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 12:02:01 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at c-s.fr Received: from messagerie.si.c-s.fr ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (messagerie.si.c-s.fr [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10023) with ESMTP id M0XrWoJzsNRE; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 12:02:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.235.99] (unknown [192.168.235.99]) by messagerie.si.c-s.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBC588B763; Mon, 9 Jun 2025 12:02:00 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <6fbbb13e-aedd-47ad-a58b-cc00e9ea138c@csgroup.eu> Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2025 12:02:00 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ALSA: pcm: Convert multiple {get/put}_user to user_access_begin/user_access_end() To: Takashi Iwai Cc: Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, Herve Codina , Mark Brown References: <87zfeh72sz.wl-tiwai@suse.de> Content-Language: fr-FR From: Christophe Leroy In-Reply-To: <87zfeh72sz.wl-tiwai@suse.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Le 09/06/2025 à 10:10, Takashi Iwai a écrit : > On Mon, 09 Jun 2025 10:00:38 +0200, > Christophe Leroy wrote: >> >> With user access protection (Called SMAP on x86 or KUAP on powerpc) >> each and every call to get_user() or put_user() performs heavy >> operations to unlock and lock kernel access to userspace. >> >> To avoid that, perform user accesses by blocks using >> user_access_begin/user_access_end() and unsafe_get_user()/ >> unsafe_put_user() and alike. >> >> As an exemple, before the patch the 9 calls to put_user() at the >> end of snd_pcm_ioctl_sync_ptr_compat() imply the following set of >> instructions about 9 times (access_ok - enable user - write - disable >> user): >> 0.00 : c057f858: 3d 20 7f ff lis r9,32767 >> 0.29 : c057f85c: 39 5e 00 14 addi r10,r30,20 >> 0.77 : c057f860: 61 29 ff fc ori r9,r9,65532 >> 0.32 : c057f864: 7c 0a 48 40 cmplw r10,r9 >> 0.36 : c057f868: 41 a1 fb 58 bgt c057f3c0 >> 0.30 : c057f86c: 3d 20 dc 00 lis r9,-9216 >> 1.95 : c057f870: 7d 3a c3 a6 mtspr 794,r9 >> 0.33 : c057f874: 92 8a 00 00 stw r20,0(r10) >> 0.27 : c057f878: 3d 20 de 00 lis r9,-8704 >> 0.28 : c057f87c: 7d 3a c3 a6 mtspr 794,r9 >> ... >> >> A perf profile shows that in total the 9 put_user() represent 36% of >> the time spent in snd_pcm_ioctl() and about 80 instructions. >> >> With this patch everything is done in 13 instructions and represent >> only 15% of the time spent in snd_pcm_ioctl(): >> >> 0.57 : c057f5dc: 3d 20 dc 00 lis r9,-9216 >> 0.98 : c057f5e0: 7d 3a c3 a6 mtspr 794,r9 >> 0.16 : c057f5e4: 92 7f 00 04 stw r19,4(r31) >> 0.63 : c057f5e8: 93 df 00 0c stw r30,12(r31) >> 0.16 : c057f5ec: 93 9f 00 10 stw r28,16(r31) >> 4.95 : c057f5f0: 92 9f 00 14 stw r20,20(r31) >> 0.19 : c057f5f4: 92 5f 00 18 stw r18,24(r31) >> 0.49 : c057f5f8: 92 bf 00 1c stw r21,28(r31) >> 0.27 : c057f5fc: 93 7f 00 20 stw r27,32(r31) >> 5.88 : c057f600: 93 36 00 00 stw r25,0(r22) >> 0.11 : c057f604: 93 17 00 00 stw r24,0(r23) >> 0.00 : c057f608: 3d 20 de 00 lis r9,-8704 >> 0.79 : c057f60c: 7d 3a c3 a6 mtspr 794,r9 >> >> Note that here the access_ok() in user_write_access_begin() is skipped >> because the exact same verification has already been performed at the >> beginning of the fonction with the call to user_read_access_begin(). >> >> A couple more can be converted as well but require >> unsafe_copy_from_user() which is not defined on x86 and arm64, so >> those are left aside for the time being and will be handled in a >> separate patch. >> >> Signed-off-by: Christophe Leroy >> --- >> v2: Split out the two hunks using copy_from_user() as unsafe_copy_from_user() is not implemented on x86 and arm64 yet. > > Thanks for the patch. > > The idea looks interesting, but the implementations with > unsafe_get_user() leads to very ugly goto lines, and that's too bad; > it makes the code flow much more difficult to follow. > > I guess that, in most cases this patch tries to cover, we just use > another temporary variable for compat struct, copy fields locally, > then run copy_to_user() in a shot instead. Thanks for looking. I'll give it a try but I think going through a local intermediate will be less performant than direct copy with unsafe_get/put_user(). Christophe