From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.manjaro.org (mail.manjaro.org [116.203.91.91]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DFE72157A42; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 20:51:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.91.91 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712695870; cv=none; b=AV3g9nTmBEoZ0USuVVysN9gHUHlpbu7KIYrqO2+rXwsratXoGBd8cZkZOAdJ2itXiokS5p5+HlKXMwJbpH53ZEiVPsDo/Un7meeHLxSrdZVw7RwrQJIFwosh0ck5ZqjX4mcCbDgju9r937LuyIJRWvYOHKq0nlyEHHVggOrWmWQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712695870; c=relaxed/simple; bh=x9uTbMryrYRPeYaxZYL/4WdL+gBS4SrJV9Y1ktnDkeM=; h=MIME-Version:Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References: Message-ID:Content-Type; b=jR6RXY+LQlLNn/+4LMemRy2PmQGmfjF4q0FUtwB6ESMOEPmRgEMazQzO2VqSdJrNqukMlotlttpNJVRbiqHogV8YO65IamYiXNzm/S7UGqQo6CTyiOKi7KA3OWdzwYqdnY5vN6W1G2aasC9nV77edTZXt8VLuDTOx1rfzoUoAlE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manjaro.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manjaro.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b=UFHKvRUW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=116.203.91.91 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=manjaro.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=manjaro.org header.i=@manjaro.org header.b="UFHKvRUW" Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=manjaro.org; s=2021; t=1712695865; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=W4vCLj0Ij2TkOJ/jGCoTYZdEj+p3YFGzHYBfUFoB3xI=; b=UFHKvRUWJxaMo37hD9BdfQ1YuDYUiJ5kwlV0A6uIw4FYK1WugspdqPEZm4yzPlWdnWXhy8 ip5zmfp6NbNMBGt4VnPo4hLOYWTKpeRuzLiRPJhCbE8pPXvhPU1wfOl2+jFsB5HIMYTjfX S0UBzMIYrx5KyH3T+6UOi1hBWVjz2eNIM873SRDVvGA1T4g1kROS5G6j1vnSPGTDgWUR7J zxoJsaP63zW5dVsuz/W5T+S5RNC3iaW9dT4lBw0iO+ZKjlNtC54XXwBOiSldzc+sJnI1pk jrR7mRfQA/hk74SPxl1ovibsw7XDboyk2C6FcJ0PdZoASTV8CJflw4uthuiRZw== Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2024 22:51:05 +0200 From: Dragan Simic To: Mark Brown Cc: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: pcm: perform power-down delay checks a bit faster In-Reply-To: <171269542042.178415.9248384379060261944.b4-ty@kernel.org> References: <90ae761a5b99640ece48363a7099ac2cf402bd37.1712684592.git.dsimic@manjaro.org> <171269542042.178415.9248384379060261944.b4-ty@kernel.org> Message-ID: <772a45aeefeb0e63b85d9af17c971e2c@manjaro.org> X-Sender: dsimic@manjaro.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Authentication-Results: ORIGINATING; auth=pass smtp.auth=dsimic@manjaro.org smtp.mailfrom=dsimic@manjaro.org On 2024-04-09 22:43, Mark Brown wrote: > On Tue, 09 Apr 2024 19:56:36 +0200, Dragan Simic wrote: >> When checking whether the power-down delay should be ignored for a >> specific >> PCM runtime, there's no need to keep going through all DAI link >> components >> after any of them is found to be configured to use the power-down >> delay. >> >> While there, fix a small typo in one of the comment blocks. >> >> >> [...] > > Applied to > > https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git > for-next > > Thanks! > > [1/1] ASoC: pcm: perform power-down delay checks a bit faster > commit: f78bf2c933c9cb3b61215378664f83c5abd25374 Great, thanks! > All being well this means that it will be integrated into the > linux-next > tree (usually sometime in the next 24 hours) and sent to Linus during > the next merge window (or sooner if it is a bug fix), however if > problems are discovered then the patch may be dropped or reverted. > > You may get further e-mails resulting from automated or manual testing > and review of the tree, please engage with people reporting problems > and > send followup patches addressing any issues that are reported if > needed. > > If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they > should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing > patches will not be replaced. > > Please add any relevant lists and maintainers to the CCs when replying > to this mail. > > Thanks, > Mark