From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: "Péter Ujfalusi" <peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>, Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@gmail.com>,
Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com>,
Daniel Baluta <daniel.baluta@nxp.com>,
Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev>,
Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 31/31] ASoC: SOF: Use auto-cleanup for firmware loading
Date: Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:18:26 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <871pcbe6al.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c603df64-4f9b-4759-bc6b-ce4fbca4b499@linux.intel.com>
On Thu, 06 Aug 2026 15:04:33 +0200,
Péter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
>
>
> On 06/08/2026 15:06, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> >>> - fw_filename = kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s/%s", profile->fw_path,
> >>> - profile->fw_name);
> >>> + const char *fw_filename __free(kfree) =
> >>> + kasprintf(GFP_KERNEL, "%s/%s", profile->fw_path,
> >>> + profile->fw_name);
> >>> if (!fw_filename)
> >>> return -ENOMEM;
> >>>
> >>> + const struct firmware *fw __free(firmware) = NULL;
> >>
> >> can we keep this at the head of the function?
> >
> > We can, but for the auto-cleaned stuff, it's rather recommended to put
> > the declaration at the position that actually starts using it. Then
> > you can avoid the unnecessary handling of the auto-cleanup.
>
> The only mention I have seen is the header and it does say that one
> should avoid having the declaration and allocation split _if_ the
> pointer is not initialzied, or do it in one line.
>
> Where it will get a bit blurry is when you have
> {
> const struct firmware *fw __free(firmware) = NULL;
>
> ...
> ret = something_which_might_fail();
> if (ret)
> goto out;
>
> ret = request_firmware();
> }
>
> out:
> ...
Yes, and we hits this in a couple patches in this series, and the
workaround is to declare at the beginning.
(One can say that moving the declaration *is* helpful to catch such a
corner case :)
> > (I don't find whether it's mentioned, though; the documentation about
> > the auto-cleanup isn't well organized yet, unfortunately...)
>
> OK, let's leave it as it is, my ack and tested tag still stands ;)
Thanks!
Takashi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-06 13:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-08-05 13:52 [PATCH 00/31] ASoC: Use auto-cleanup for firmware loading Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 01/31] ASoC: aw87390: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 02/31] ASoC: aw88081: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 03/31] ASoC: aw88166: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 04/31] ASoC: aw88261: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 05/31] ASoC: aw88395: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 06/31] ASoC: aw88399: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 07/31] ASoC: fs-amp-lib: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 08/31] ASoC: hdac_hda: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 09/31] ASoC: max98390: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 10/31] ASoC: ntpfw: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 11/31] ASoC: pcm6240: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 16:47 ` Herve Codina
2026-08-06 6:16 ` Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 12/31] ASoC: peb2466: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 16:50 ` Herve Codina
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 13/31] ASoC: rt1320-sdw: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 22:56 ` Mark Brown
2026-08-06 7:37 ` Takashi Iwai
2026-08-06 11:52 ` Mark Brown
2026-08-06 13:48 ` Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 14/31] ASoC: rt5575: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 15/31] ASoC: rt5677: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 16/31] ASoC: rt722-sdca: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 17/31] ASoC: sigmadsp: se " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 16:08 ` Nuno Sá
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 18/31] ASoC: sma1307: Use " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 19/31] ASoC: tas2781: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 20/31] ASoC: tas5805m: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 21/31] ASoC: tlv320aic31xx: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 22/31] ASoC: wm0010: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 23/31] ASoC: wm2000: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 23:16 ` Mark Brown
2026-08-06 7:38 ` Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 24/31] ASoC: zl38060: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 25/31] ASoC: fsl: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 26/31] ASoC: Intel: avs: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 14:48 ` Cezary Rojewski
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 27/31] ASoC: Intel: catpt: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 14:48 ` Cezary Rojewski
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 28/31] ASoC: qcom: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 29/31] ASoC: renesas: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 30/31] ASoC: SDCA: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-05 14:34 ` Charles Keepax
2026-08-05 13:52 ` [PATCH 31/31] ASoC: SOF: " Takashi Iwai
2026-08-06 11:56 ` Péter Ujfalusi
2026-08-06 12:06 ` Takashi Iwai
2026-08-06 13:04 ` Péter Ujfalusi
2026-08-06 13:18 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=871pcbe6al.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=daniel.baluta@nxp.com \
--cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pierre-louis.bossart@linux.dev \
--cc=yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox