From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB51A1D0F54; Wed, 30 Oct 2024 22:18:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730326742; cv=none; b=NOf8BTvN2/JqLX7Q/dfy7a4Ji73Kem+PlVU+CJ84PHSK8NrlXetpEO2X4m+FF+FOFpfGsEyIlEqoJqJQLF97KVFX+Qlw1JUBAUucY9K7A9T/ezP69XJk2sSpFBGddYzGaX8IymXHcGgEtk5icif9q45AnZC4U127bqYt9jmFnSQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730326742; c=relaxed/simple; bh=F3rCOskbgR5Tgx+Rf/5frqWmUJHOP3bkNxuCb2WvJA4=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=NFYZr0/BUsvskrrzWTWE8VQDx8056aydAHKxZ5TLE2RO6vguKy7XVWtRitvXQZaT57E2TtN0SDei3vD6sjtqxcMaR1cSHvkVPAai5W3C2KkA7V/xbtY836ohb1ouEeCp1CeQbYFoYFqGJ8C4pHq7+RaB3Wl7cu5QQQhrpI/VvCE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=rPA/LP7h; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="rPA/LP7h" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 343C242C0B DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1730326729; bh=mcsnwyNOjL28C4fD3C7HpEhmbEgiYcyoM3bw9n6dh1s=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=rPA/LP7hJ/Umkl4IcwguZH6HORv5nbibamyQjSonnFpRubxoem/dlnC7lXjKGd84t 9XABCZ0AYVKnQzAMojT4sdSWY+GVF5L5hKgW/K7EvyzzTb9fIyTUjbu2S4tRoT101m FJ94f/TkpJaWFmqd/tSkZPKNFwwrEUfFmeiyAiIzzLuFwjtpm2FRlQIPl9dTbj/sJ2 cEiwUW8xWIIl2hIE/Ck5J0I6uEVIriRaIOSXi4bS8U2SGKipUYzbNfEJRC20MI0M/M Zwplo1TUVkq1MvGR3Pk2TAWXTvL1L+7hm8H4UMRvfVrjPDXHAh1hif8z9/qKyhFNe9 wGJIBg+EYzytQ== Received: from localhost (mdns.lwn.net [45.79.72.68]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 343C242C0B; Wed, 30 Oct 2024 22:18:49 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: anish kumar , broonie@kernel.org Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] ASoC: doc: update clocking In-Reply-To: References: <20241029235623.46990-1-yesanishhere@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 30 Oct 2024 16:18:46 -0600 Message-ID: <874j4ts08p.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain anish kumar writes: >> This feels like it is (or should be) duplicating the kerneldoc generated >> documentation - I'm not sure that we can cross reference the two >> sensibly through? > > Jonathan, wondering if you know a way to link the clock functions defined > in https://github.com/torvalds/linux/blob/master/sound/soc/soc-dai.c here? I'm not quite sure what your question is. Kerneldoc comments can be brought into the documentation, of course - that's a big part of what the build system does. You can link to that documentation just by saying function() - nothing more required. What else are you looking for? Thanks, jon