Linux Sound subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: HariKrishna Sagala <hariconscious@gmail.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
	perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com,
	cryolitia@uniontech.com, franta-linux@frantovo.cz,
	khalid@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
	david.hunter.linux@gmail.com, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: usb-audio: Initialize status1 to fix uninitialized symbol errors
Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2025 13:54:28 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87sedrsp2z.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b44d6cf3-a96e-c0d4-99e3-c6af916a2e21@gmail.com>

On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 13:01:48 +0100,
HariKrishna Sagala wrote:
> 
> On Wed, 3 Dec 2025, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> 
> > On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 12:22:27 +0100,
> > HariKrishna Sagala wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 3 Dec 2025, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 12:01:35 +0100,
> > > > HariKrishna Sagala wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Wed, 3 Dec 2025, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Wed, 03 Dec 2025 09:33:20 +0100,
> > > > > > hariconscious@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > From: HariKrishna Sagala <hariconscious@gmail.com>
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Initialize 'status1' with a default value to resolve the static analysis
> > > > > > > smatch reported error "uninitialized symbol 'status1'".
> > > > > > > The 'status1' variable is used to create a buff using "kmemdup".
> > > > > > > So, ensure to initialize the value before it is read.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: HariKrishna Sagala <hariconscious@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > ---
> > > > > > > This patch fixes the below smatch reported errors.
> > > > > > > sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c:2462 snd_rme_rate_get() error: uninitialized symbol 'status1'.
> > > > > > > sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c:2467 snd_rme_rate_get() error: uninitialized symbol 'status1'.
> > > > > > > sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c:2472 snd_rme_rate_get() error: uninitialized symbol 'status1'.
> > > > > > > sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c:2495 snd_rme_sync_state_get() error: uninitialized symbol 'status1'.
> > > > > > > sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c:2501 snd_rme_sync_state_get() error: uninitialized symbol 'status1'.
> > > > > > > sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c:2522 snd_rme_spdif_if_get() error: uninitialized symbol 'status1'.
> > > > > > > sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c:2535 snd_rme_spdif_format_get() error: uninitialized symbol 'status1'.
> > > > > > > sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c:2548 snd_rme_sync_source_get() error: uninitialized symbol 'status1'.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The below is the flow of 'status1' it is used before initialization.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > snd_rme_rate_get -> status1 is uninitialized and passed
> > > > > > > 	snd_rme_get_status1 -> passed as is
> > > > > > > 		snd_rme_read_value -> passed as is
> > > > > > > 			snd_usb_ctl_msg -> created buf from status1 using kmemdup
> > > > > > > 				usb_control_msg -> sent buf for reading/writing
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Description of "usb_control_msg", states as
> > > > > > > " * @data: pointer to the data to send"
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Later from Usb control request, dst buf is copied to src buf but usb
> > > > > > > control msg request is made before initialization.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thank you.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c | 10 +++++-----
> > > > > > >  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > diff --git a/sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c b/sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c
> > > > > > > index 828af3095b86..06903c5de087 100644
> > > > > > > --- a/sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c
> > > > > > > +++ b/sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c
> > > > > > > @@ -2449,7 +2449,7 @@ static int snd_rme_get_status1(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> > > > > > >  static int snd_rme_rate_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> > > > > > >  			    struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
> > > > > > >  {
> > > > > > > -	u32 status1;
> > > > > > > +	u32 status1 = 0;
> > > > > > >  	u32 rate = 0;
> > > > > > >  	int idx;
> > > > > > >  	int err;
> > > > > > > @@ -2483,7 +2483,7 @@ static int snd_rme_rate_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> > > > > > >  static int snd_rme_sync_state_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> > > > > > >  				  struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
> > > > > > >  {
> > > > > > > -	u32 status1;
> > > > > > > +	u32 status1 = 0;
> > > > > > >  	int idx = SND_RME_CLOCK_NOLOCK;
> > > > > > >  	int err;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > @@ -2513,7 +2513,7 @@ static int snd_rme_sync_state_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> > > > > > >  static int snd_rme_spdif_if_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> > > > > > >  				struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
> > > > > > >  {
> > > > > > > -	u32 status1;
> > > > > > > +	u32 status1 = 0;
> > > > > > >  	int err;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  	err = snd_rme_get_status1(kcontrol, &status1);
> > > > > > > @@ -2526,7 +2526,7 @@ static int snd_rme_spdif_if_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> > > > > > >  static int snd_rme_spdif_format_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> > > > > > >  				    struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
> > > > > > >  {
> > > > > > > -	u32 status1;
> > > > > > > +	u32 status1 = 0;
> > > > > > >  	int err;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  	err = snd_rme_get_status1(kcontrol, &status1);
> > > > > > > @@ -2539,7 +2539,7 @@ static int snd_rme_spdif_format_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> > > > > > >  static int snd_rme_sync_source_get(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> > > > > > >  				   struct snd_ctl_elem_value *ucontrol)
> > > > > > >  {
> > > > > > > -	u32 status1;
> > > > > > > +	u32 status1 = 0;
> > > > > > >  	int err;
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >  	err = snd_rme_get_status1(kcontrol, &status1);
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The warning itself is rather dubious.  But it'd certainly give a safer
> > > > > > feeling to cover the uninitialized variables, so it would still make
> > > > > > some sense.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But, the code change can be improved.  e.g. initialize the value in
> > > > > > the callee side, instead of callers; then it'll reduce all changes to
> > > > > > a one-liner.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > At the next time, please look at the patterns you changed more closely
> > > > > > and think again whether it's the best change or not before submission.
> > > > > > On the second look, often you see things from a different perspective
> > > > > > :)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > thanks,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Takashi
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Hi Takashi,
> > > > >
> > > > > Thank you for the feedback and complement.
> > > > > Yes, will check the pattern and avoid this going forward.
> > > > > As all the functions call "snd_rme_get_status1",
> > > > > initialized here but smatch didn't silence them.
> > > > >
> > > > > I prefer initializing a variable in caller side as it owns
> > > > > and aware of initialized value sent.
> > > > >
> > > > > Sorry, if I had misunderstood your suggestion.
> > > >
> > > > Well, you seem driven too much by smatch.  Just look at your patch
> > > > again.
> > > >
> > > > You're repeating the same initializations and passing to the same
> > > > function.  And those are the only callers of snd_rme_get_status1().
> > > > So, instead of initializing in the caller side, initialize the value
> > > > in snd_rme_get_status1().  Then the whole your changes will be
> > > > oneliner like below.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Takashi
> > > >
> > > > --- a/sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c
> > > > +++ b/sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c
> > > > @@ -2548,6 +2548,7 @@ static int snd_rme_get_status1(struct snd_kcontrol *kcontrol,
> > > >  	CLASS(snd_usb_lock, pm)(chip);
> > > >  	if (pm.err < 0)
> > > >  		return pm.err;
> > > > +	*status1 = 0;
> > > >  	return snd_rme_read_value(chip, SND_RME_GET_STATUS1, status1);
> > > >  }
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Hi Takashi,
> > >
> > > Yes, tried that before, smatch didn't silence them.
> >
> > Then it's an obvious failure of smatch.
> >
> > Or you might set *status1 = 0 at the beginning of
> > snd_rme_get_status1() although it makes little sense.
> >
> > > If it is worth having this change though they are not silenced,
> > > will raise v2 otherwise will drop this patch.
> >
> > If the smatch still complains, it's not worth.
> >
> >
> > Takashi
> >
> 
> Hi Takashi,
> 
> This is the change I tried but smatch didn't silence them.
> 
> diff --git a/sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c b/sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c
> index 828af3095b86..10354576d325 100644
> --- a/sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c
> +++ b/sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c
> @@ -2443,6 +2443,7 @@ static int snd_rme_get_status1(struct snd_kcontrol
> *kcontrol,
>         CLASS(snd_usb_lock, pm)(chip);
>         if (pm.err < 0)
>                 return pm.err;
> +       *status1 = 0;
>         return snd_rme_read_value(chip, SND_RME_GET_STATUS1, status1);
>  }
> 
> Below are reported with the change, as seen they are not silenced.
> 
> sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c:2463 snd_rme_rate_get() error: uninitialized
> symbol 'status1'.
> sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c:2468 snd_rme_rate_get() error: uninitialized
> symbol 'status1'.
> sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c:2473 snd_rme_rate_get() error: uninitialized
> symbol 'status1'.
> sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c:2496 snd_rme_sync_state_get() error:
> uninitialized symbol 'status1'.
> sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c:2502 snd_rme_sync_state_get() error:
> uninitialized symbol 'status1'.
> sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c:2523 snd_rme_spdif_if_get() error: uninitialized
> symbol 'status1'.
> sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c:2536 snd_rme_spdif_format_get() error:
> uninitialized symbol 'status1'.
> sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c:2549 snd_rme_sync_source_get() error:
> uninitialized symbol 'status1'.
> sound/usb/mixer_quirks.c:4137 snd_djm_controls_info() warn: potential
> spectre issue 'ctl->options' [r] (local cap)

As mentioned, try to put *status1=0 line before CLASS() call in the
above.  If this still doesn't help, it's a bug of smatch, and we
should ignore it.


Takashi

  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-03 12:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-12-03  8:33 [PATCH] ALSA: usb-audio: Initialize status1 to fix uninitialized symbol errors hariconscious
2025-12-03  8:56 ` Takashi Iwai
2025-12-03 11:01   ` HariKrishna Sagala
2025-12-03 11:09     ` Takashi Iwai
2025-12-03 11:22       ` HariKrishna Sagala
2025-12-03 11:50         ` Takashi Iwai
2025-12-03 12:01           ` HariKrishna Sagala
2025-12-03 12:54             ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2025-12-03 13:34               ` HariKrishna Sagala

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87sedrsp2z.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
    --to=tiwai@suse.de \
    --cc=cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com \
    --cc=cryolitia@uniontech.com \
    --cc=david.hunter.linux@gmail.com \
    --cc=franta-linux@frantovo.cz \
    --cc=hariconscious@gmail.com \
    --cc=khalid@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox