From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: WenTao Liang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
Cc: perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, chenziqing@xiaomi.com,
broonie@kernel.org, cezary.rojewski@intel.com, kees@kernel.org,
linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stable@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sound/core: fix refcount leak in snd_ctl_elem_info_user()
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 09:53:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87y0gki499.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260612022121.14329-1-vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
On Fri, 12 Jun 2026 04:21:21 +0200,
WenTao Liang wrote:
>
> snd_ctl_elem_info_user() calls snd_power_ref_and_wait() to obtain
> a power reference for the sound card. If that function returns an
> error (e.g. -ENODEV when the card is shutting down), the reference
> is still held because snd_power_ref_and_wait() always acquires it
> unconditionally. However, the error path in snd_ctl_elem_info_user()
> directly returns the error without releasing the reference, causing
> a refcount leak.
>
> Fix it by calling snd_power_unref() before returning the error,
> matching the successful path that already does the paired unref.
>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: fcc62b19104a ("ALSA: control: Take power_ref lock primarily")
> Signed-off-by: WenTao Liang <vulab@iscas.ac.cn>
Judging from the current code patterns, it's better to fix the
function behavior itself -- unreference in snd_power_ref_and_wait()
itself when returning an error; otherwise there are way too many
callers to fix up, and the current behavior is rather confusing.
Could you try the patch below instead?
thanks,
Takashi
-- 8< --
--- a/sound/core/init.c
+++ b/sound/core/init.c
@@ -1139,7 +1139,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(snd_card_file_remove);
* typically around calling control ops.
*
* The caller needs to pull down the refcount via snd_power_unref() later
- * no matter whether the error is returned from this function or not.
+ * when this function returns 0.
*
* Return: Zero if successful, or a negative error code.
*/
@@ -1152,7 +1152,11 @@ int snd_power_ref_and_wait(struct snd_card *card)
card->shutdown ||
snd_power_get_state(card) == SNDRV_CTL_POWER_D0,
snd_power_unref(card), snd_power_ref(card));
- return card->shutdown ? -ENODEV : 0;
+ if (card->shutdown) {
+ snd_power_unref(card);
+ return -ENODEV;
+ }
+ return 0;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(snd_power_ref_and_wait);
@@ -1169,7 +1173,8 @@ int snd_power_wait(struct snd_card *card)
int ret;
ret = snd_power_ref_and_wait(card);
- snd_power_unref(card);
+ if (!ret)
+ snd_power_unref(card);
return ret;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL(snd_power_wait);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-12 7:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-12 2:21 [PATCH] sound/core: fix refcount leak in snd_ctl_elem_info_user() WenTao Liang
2026-06-12 7:53 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87y0gki499.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cezary.rojewski@intel.com \
--cc=chenziqing@xiaomi.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=vulab@iscas.ac.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox