Re: [PATCH v3 2/5] ASoC: qcom: sm8250: set card driver name from match data

["Luca Weiss" <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>]

Hi Srini,

On Fri May 2, 2025 at 1:06 PM CEST, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> On 5/1/25 15:13, Luca Weiss wrote:
>> Hi Srini,
>> 
>> Srinivas Kandagatla <srini@kernel.org> schreef op 1 mei 2025 13:37:45 CEST:
>>> On Fri, Apr 25, 2025 at 10:07:26AM +0200, Luca Weiss wrote:
>>>> Sound machine drivers for Qualcomm SoCs can be reused across multiple
>>>> SoCs. But user space ALSA UCM files depend on the card driver name which
>>>> should be set per board/SoC.
>>>>
>>>> Allow such customization by using driver match data as sound card driver
>>>> name.
>>>>
>>>> Also while we're already touching these lines, sort the compatibles
>>>> alphabetically.
>>>>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
>>>> Reviewed-by: Neil Armstrong <neil.armstrong@linaro.org>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Luca Weiss <luca.weiss@fairphone.com>
>>>> ---
>>>>  sound/soc/qcom/sm8250.c | 9 ++++-----
>>>>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/sm8250.c b/sound/soc/qcom/sm8250.c
>>>> index b70b2a5031dfbf69024666f8a1049c263efcde0a..e920b413b762c803cfcc4049f35deba828275478 100644
>>>> --- a/sound/soc/qcom/sm8250.c
>>>> +++ b/sound/soc/qcom/sm8250.c
>>>> @@ -16,7 +16,6 @@
>>>>  #include "usb_offload_utils.h"
>>>>  #include "sdw.h"
>>>>  
>>>> -#define DRIVER_NAME		"sm8250"
>>>>  #define MI2S_BCLK_RATE		1536000
>>>>  
>>>>  struct sm8250_snd_data {
>>>> @@ -200,15 +199,15 @@ static int sm8250_platform_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>>>  	if (ret)
>>>>  		return ret;
>>>>  
>>>> -	card->driver_name = DRIVER_NAME;
>>>> +	card->driver_name = of_device_get_match_data(dev);
>>>>  	sm8250_add_be_ops(card);
>>>>  	return devm_snd_soc_register_card(dev, card);
>>>>  }
>>>>  
>>>>  static const struct of_device_id snd_sm8250_dt_match[] = {
>>>> -	{.compatible = "qcom,sm8250-sndcard"},
>>>> -	{.compatible = "qcom,qrb4210-rb2-sndcard"},
>>>> -	{.compatible = "qcom,qrb5165-rb5-sndcard"},
>>>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,qrb4210-rb2-sndcard", .data = "sm8250" },
>>>
>>> sm4250 for rb2?
>> 
>> Since this name is visible to user space and used for picking the UCM config, I don't think it's a good idea to change it.
>> 
> It is not correct to pretend that rb2 is sm8250 for ucm cases, I agree previous code was
> already doing this, Good thing is that we do not have a ucm written yet for RB2.
>
> Lets fix this as you are already doing this for other compatibles.

Okay, will change this in v4.

Regards
Luca

>
> --srini
>
>> Regards
>> Luca
>> 
>>>
>>>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,qrb5165-rb5-sndcard", .data = "sm8250" },
>>>> +	{ .compatible = "qcom,sm8250-sndcard", .data = "sm8250" },
>>>>  	{}
>>>>  };
>>>>  
>>>>
>>>> -- 
>>>> 2.49.0
>>>>