On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 07:11:14PM +0800, Bard Liao wrote:
> +  (2) A CRC on the data block (header excluded). This CRC is
> +      transmitted as the last-but-one byte in the packet, prior to the
                            penultimate byte?
> +      footer response.
> +
> +The header response can be one of
                             "one of:"
> +  (a) Ack
> +  (b) Nak
> +  (c) Not Ready
> +
> +The footer response can be one of
Ditto.
> +  (1) Ack
> +  (2) Nak  (CRC failure)
> +  (3) Good (operation completed)
> +  (4) Bad  (operation failed)
> +
> <snipped>...
> +      ::
> +
> +	+---+--------------------------------------------+
> +	+   |                                            |
> +	+   |             BRA HEADER                     |
> +        +   |	                                         |
Nit: this line is indented with spaces instead of tabs, but the table still
renders perfectly in htmldocs output (no warnings).
> +	+   +--------------------------------------------+
> +	+ C |             HEADER CRC                     |
> +	+ O +--------------------------------------------+
> +	+ M | 	          HEADER RESPONSE                |
> +	+ M +--------------------------------------------+
> +	+ A |                                            |
> +	+ N |                                            |
> +	+ D |                 DATA                       |
> +	+   |                                            |
> +	+   |                                            |
> +	+   |                                            |
> +	+   +--------------------------------------------+
> +	+   |             DATA CRC                       |
> +	+   +--------------------------------------------+
> +	+   | 	          FOOTER RESPONSE                |
> +	+---+--------------------------------------------+
> +
> <snipped>...
> +Each packet will typically have
                             "have:"
> +One possible strategy to speed-up all initialization tasks would be to
> +start a BRA transfer for firmware download, then deal with all the
> +"regular" read/writes in parallel with the command channel, and last
> +to wait for the BRA transfers to complete. This would allow for a
> +degree of overlap instead of a purely sequential solution. As a
> +results, the BRA API must support async transfers and expose a
"As such, ..."
> +separate wait function.
> <snipped>...
> +The bus interface for BPT/BRA is made of two functions
                                           "two functions:"

Thanks.

-- 
An old man doll... just what I always wanted! - Clara