From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@treblig.org>
To: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
Cc: patches@lists.linux.dev, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>,
perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, yuehaibing@huawei.com,
linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.15 101/110] ALSA: seq: Remove unused snd_seq_queue_client_leave_cells
Date: Sun, 1 Jun 2025 23:51:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aDznZgej_QbaalP0@gallifrey> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250601232435.3507697-101-sashal@kernel.org>
* Sasha Levin (sashal@kernel.org) wrote:
Hi Sasha,
> From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <linux@treblig.org>
>
> [ Upstream commit 81ea9e92941091bb3178d49e63b13bf4df2ee46b ]
>
> The last use of snd_seq_queue_client_leave_cells() was removed in 2018
> by
> commit 85d59b57be59 ("ALSA: seq: Remove superfluous
> snd_seq_queue_client_leave_cells() call")
>
> Remove it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <linux@treblig.org>
> Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
> Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20250502235219.1000429-4-linux@treblig.org
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
> ---
>
> NO This commit should not be backported to stable kernel trees for
> several reasons:
I'd agree with that big fat NO - unless it makes your life easier backporting
a big pile of other stuff.
I'm a bit curious about:
a) How it got picked up by autosel - I'm quite careful not to include
'fixes' tags to avoid them getting picked up.
b) Given it's got a big fat no, why is it posted here?
Dave
**1. This is a code cleanup, not a bug fix** The commit
> removes dead code (`snd_seq_queue_client_leave_cells()`) that hasn't
> been used since 2018. The commit message explicitly states this function
> was already removed from use by commit 85d59b57be59 in 2018, and this
> commit is simply cleaning up the unused function definition. This is
> purely a maintenance/cleanup change with no functional impact. **2. No
> user-visible impact or bug being fixed** The removed function
> `snd_seq_queue_client_leave_cells()` was already unused, so removing it
> doesn't fix any existing bugs, security issues, or user-reported
> problems. The code changes show: - Removal of the function
> implementation from `sound/core/seq/seq_queue.c` (lines that iterate
> through queues and call `snd_seq_prioq_leave()`) - Removal of the
> function declaration from `sound/core/seq/seq_queue.h` **3. Follows
> pattern of similar non-backported commits** Looking at the similar
> commits provided: - **Similar Commit #1**: Removed superfluous function
> call - Status: NO - **Similar Commit #2**: Removed useless function -
> Status: NO - **Similar Commit #4**: Removed unused declarations -
> Status: NO - **Similar Commit #5**: Code refactoring with no functional
> changes - Status: NO Only **Similar Commit #3** was backported (Status:
> YES), and that was because it fixed an actual race condition bug that
> could cause long stalls, not because it was removing unused code. **4.
> Stable tree criteria not met** Stable kernel backports should focus on:
> - Important bug fixes that affect users - Security fixes - Critical
> functionality issues This commit doesn't meet any of these criteria.
> It's purely cosmetic code cleanup that removes dead code without
> changing any runtime behavior. **5. Risk vs. benefit analysis** While
> the risk of regression is minimal since the function was unused, there's
> no benefit to users of stable kernels from this change. Stable trees
> should minimize churn and only include changes that provide tangible
> benefits to users. The commit represents good housekeeping for the
> mainline kernel but doesn't provide the type of user-impacting fix that
> justifies inclusion in stable kernel trees.
>
> sound/core/seq/seq_queue.c | 16 ----------------
> sound/core/seq/seq_queue.h | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/sound/core/seq/seq_queue.c b/sound/core/seq/seq_queue.c
> index 5df26788dda41..10add922323da 100644
> --- a/sound/core/seq/seq_queue.c
> +++ b/sound/core/seq/seq_queue.c
> @@ -564,22 +564,6 @@ void snd_seq_queue_client_leave(int client)
>
> /*----------------------------------------------------------------*/
>
> -/* remove cells from all queues */
> -void snd_seq_queue_client_leave_cells(int client)
> -{
> - int i;
> - struct snd_seq_queue *q;
> -
> - for (i = 0; i < SNDRV_SEQ_MAX_QUEUES; i++) {
> - q = queueptr(i);
> - if (!q)
> - continue;
> - snd_seq_prioq_leave(q->tickq, client, 0);
> - snd_seq_prioq_leave(q->timeq, client, 0);
> - queuefree(q);
> - }
> -}
> -
> /* remove cells based on flush criteria */
> void snd_seq_queue_remove_cells(int client, struct snd_seq_remove_events *info)
> {
> diff --git a/sound/core/seq/seq_queue.h b/sound/core/seq/seq_queue.h
> index 74cc31aacdac1..b81379c9af43e 100644
> --- a/sound/core/seq/seq_queue.h
> +++ b/sound/core/seq/seq_queue.h
> @@ -66,7 +66,6 @@ void snd_seq_queue_client_leave(int client);
> int snd_seq_enqueue_event(struct snd_seq_event_cell *cell, int atomic, int hop);
>
> /* Remove events */
> -void snd_seq_queue_client_leave_cells(int client);
> void snd_seq_queue_remove_cells(int client, struct snd_seq_remove_events *info);
>
> /* return pointer to queue structure for specified id */
> --
> 2.39.5
>
--
-----Open up your eyes, open up your mind, open up your code -------
/ Dr. David Alan Gilbert | Running GNU/Linux | Happy \
\ dave @ treblig.org | | In Hex /
\ _________________________|_____ http://www.treblig.org |_______/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-06-02 0:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20250601232435.3507697-1-sashal@kernel.org>
2025-06-01 23:24 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.15 085/110] ASoC: amd: yc: Add quirk for Lenovo Yoga Pro 7 14ASP9 Sasha Levin
2025-06-01 23:24 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.15 088/110] ALSA: hda/realtek: Add support for Acer Helios Laptops using CS35L41 HDA Sasha Levin
2025-06-01 23:24 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.15 096/110] ASoC: intel/sdw_utils: Assign initial value in asoc_sdw_rt_amp_spk_rtd_init() Sasha Levin
2025-06-01 23:24 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.15 101/110] ALSA: seq: Remove unused snd_seq_queue_client_leave_cells Sasha Levin
2025-06-01 23:51 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2025-06-18 15:12 ` Sasha Levin
2025-06-18 16:19 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2025-06-01 23:24 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.15 109/110] ASoC: simple-card-utils: fixup dlc->xxx handling for error case Sasha Levin
2025-06-01 23:24 ` [PATCH AUTOSEL 6.15 110/110] ASoC: tas2770: Power cycle amp on ISENSE/VSENSE change Sasha Levin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aDznZgej_QbaalP0@gallifrey \
--to=linux@treblig.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=perex@perex.cz \
--cc=sashal@kernel.org \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=yuehaibing@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox