From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.13]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1E9241E32DB; Mon, 25 Aug 2025 16:02:22 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756137744; cv=none; b=qgVrEXtF5RGcMGAwvwmkZ0OL8k7MsJ6DkW8PDLjI0ADYdnR9ZlKPVmLtpMunimZH/F+Ru4jOn1/OVuOPae+/dQhq2oMw6we/PpDWMU1FCXjOnMWg+XLLKPxVzfX493wovtHU6DvO9yWN6QCDK8+C8g07CwsNpaJ84vewJzVLbcQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1756137744; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5RIxqJd7IqKsgGYZtC5FJ86XqFMASS2zrNcnCR9ReIo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=lqzCxAZLM0PoVMA4jcl4omndxO9GDkrRtvuH+ZJCurw/72D2GColv1sO4zJDguxXeCsKvTLuSqDqLLoV0RToGVzseFV43fkxrATu4sE2Hv3zsBWpxzshrtgNmFteh8xI5vYbjmRDdJY3pss6ZEtZBS3PEbqcdSemDFdkV7rsVUc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=gCfeFmmV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.13 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="gCfeFmmV" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1756137743; x=1787673743; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=5RIxqJd7IqKsgGYZtC5FJ86XqFMASS2zrNcnCR9ReIo=; b=gCfeFmmV7d0HFB9UPbpyoKJv5o47gS5hqi/iUU6QT79pVOzksQIsXs0D 3oQ+4hHDXxMDXdR5UTMRntdQWYwS6q9KZzMOETpgASJ93+NzfoLOAIda7 IlmsFD0s3lGBnrmcCjn/JYbzU2vOOGQNa0IKV18ynAxY2SbOvHVfParqU baCKYm5vHFLy1QLMdAQKR6MzosUAlmrf0CybzWy0ZIOnVOkFFtoTCsmxv oL0H5vTDqz7JaMdy2l9TEOP0FAXBVWW+0PLH8cQrWju33TJzp3lM3SeCX d8mPIdnNDLtgI7GiH1d52LfOcEk8KenVKuBMZL3ZtzAZvVDDBJfCRuewk Q==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: SNRdBcFYTLOX83jr93nAwg== X-CSE-MsgGUID: W+EZl6InRCSvgKAGVGRQJw== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11533"; a="60985775" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,213,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="60985775" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by fmvoesa107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Aug 2025 09:01:41 -0700 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: 70/rlXnbSf2ZxxO/KaBo8A== X-CSE-MsgGUID: eWqomYhzQUmVzg+UmhL9uw== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.18,213,1751266800"; d="scan'208";a="173512649" Received: from smile.fi.intel.com ([10.237.72.52]) by orviesa003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 25 Aug 2025 09:01:39 -0700 Received: from andy by smile.fi.intel.com with local (Exim 4.98.2) (envelope-from ) id 1uqZdY-00000008YVA-3lh9; Mon, 25 Aug 2025 19:01:36 +0300 Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2025 19:01:36 +0300 From: Andy Shevchenko To: Mark Brown Cc: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liam Girdwood , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 1/1] ASoC: amd: acp: Remove (explicitly) unused header Message-ID: References: <20250331070943.3986387-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - c/o Alberga Business Park, 6 krs, Bertel Jungin Aukio 5, 02600 Espoo On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 04:45:17PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Mon, Aug 25, 2025 at 04:55:53PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 31, 2025 at 10:09:43AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > > > The fwnode.h is not supposed to be used by the drivers as it > > > has the definitions for the core parts for different device > > > property provider implementations. Drop it. > > > > > > Note, that fwnode API for drivers is provided in property.h > > > which is included here. > > > > Any news here? > > Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time > for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so > on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) > please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been > review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed. > > Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at > all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed > directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches > anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are > some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches > for the subsystem are normally handled. I truly believe the 5 month is reasonable time for review, no? -- With Best Regards, Andy Shevchenko