From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 90F162D9EC9; Thu, 16 Oct 2025 19:21:30 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760642492; cv=none; b=WlagZYe9S5Gvurhco4ARyyvE2dLsjM01jHy/n8lwiwCuXqu7n4TBGfvE6o8LR4S1kohUM1OCRECa4udmgi5aKYxsEOsSwBu+iOYvXsyJpsAP4j5WIaF3TCDq0uBFN4DcVQg+SheWEUKlTwh22/81/dVEZICo4WIikP75SWqqOu8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1760642492; c=relaxed/simple; bh=Pj3R8CiuGY0SXWCGNJpCWI8SGHkFDgjchXQCx1mASdQ=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=M+pvpIh7NSoK1UlRz/z/RvqU45yzWeS7f6jalNUn/+5FwSmRAMs09IoivlrnO8SyRITfRiwua2NhbEyTFoUaLjsbuKGnxsWJQ39dyL5RyIv7dyDVM7i7+f5aaFYS1bk2k/78jGL98Vub9lu15ze49HpcFPUzkjQ/ylOv2dYJtoA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=rfEUVbVk; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=i9ehScE6; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="rfEUVbVk"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="i9ehScE6" Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 21:21:26 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1760642488; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Pj3R8CiuGY0SXWCGNJpCWI8SGHkFDgjchXQCx1mASdQ=; b=rfEUVbVkuVQxGU/1zNmAjnEwOFOOC+hxZVgcDzQwWnJpnYRuAaR4+L3tDmBk+KsmSomXMj Jw/If1H/d2fD18vf/hEPouI8vTUuAwzrgM/GkL8DJRkopcuKOxYDqQ0D+aUZOXhe2CsggJ fQ9DqEH9uULK8RPgGNgwoLB+LSRqg+kiP3S/aQvUGSJYHcvhunZ3EVypPVa98uiGJEytri gHIx1OBr9TV+6F4iIfWDa6JzDmjAP2fJs6aRl2NMmKrv+55LxOaF2K1wPNO6haQT/H+0zH ax65EutVMg8IilmrtBRLHQpGQgJEgF3RcYRZz5GQGnNja5XoxfYQc1B0ki7r8A== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1760642488; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Pj3R8CiuGY0SXWCGNJpCWI8SGHkFDgjchXQCx1mASdQ=; b=i9ehScE69UKn9evEUeMLkK4XNPQG9iGHLB2PlBLnPPJyrjPl2u8Ep40pAiHu796yF5Z7Gg 20b6dqzg8PJ9iICg== From: "Ahmed S. Darwish" To: Borislav Petkov Cc: Cezary Rojewski , Ingo Molnar , Dave Hansen , Thomas Gleixner , Andrew Cooper , Sean Christopherson , David Woodhouse , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Sohil Mehta , John Ogness , x86@kernel.org, x86-cpuid@lists.linux.dev, LKML , linux-sound@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 01/35] ASoC: Intel: avs: Include CPUID header at file scope Message-ID: References: <20250905121515.192792-1-darwi@linutronix.de> <20250905121515.192792-2-darwi@linutronix.de> <20251016105514.GCaPDPEu016XyDocfY@fat_crate.local> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251016105514.GCaPDPEu016XyDocfY@fat_crate.local> On Thu, 16 Oct 2025, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > Why are we even bothering with !CONFIG_X86? > > Because this thing has || COMPILE_TEST in Kconfig. > > But this thing gets enough compile testing on x86 already so why not > simply drop the whole unnecessary gunk? > Makes sense; will do. Thanks! Ahmed