From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2C8B4469D for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2026 01:08:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773623294; cv=none; b=QG7iPZ32ykTTJI7UDL1qZfZLb2Gq/7/E2PWbo4NQ3JpwQz8sBQ1fYULIFhCdD6aVgWhfjwAvAKLPzIdaoDwFQtuB7BZPzH0Fw4xvYqtaeB6Epiym50xoh8OLyZGqDZ7jA20Zj5E8PH1N8nXMbZBg4mBT2IbF0HjZHsOkOG6/1Fk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773623294; c=relaxed/simple; bh=c7ScVXyuqXiE2ePaLXunyINVvCKvDDukZnlDyauyvUA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=ox1RQLVL3ddDXkpACZAF2a2c5IXm2bbCOuGP2H54X493H2LNyNTF+KTSYp8j86WX8kiSed/0O+TXcjV6qYo4+BRWd6YX58UswBgwPT9Wae6miKCK+LClG6p+/3tTQ3vQ0mtWd/yw12fCxnVsujgm17MGMF3c4CTrEnW+rpaO6Aw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=qjfT9acI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="qjfT9acI" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 378EEC4CEF7; Mon, 16 Mar 2026 01:08:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1773623293; bh=c7ScVXyuqXiE2ePaLXunyINVvCKvDDukZnlDyauyvUA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=qjfT9acIaFBYITUioMCltr1vRPvrj9uxlI+2bQOOKNY31kVrHYj+j0hgI4cMe+iOG DGBnaqlHYRJBsuT7Q1opLktCsO19kFiPN83IFoTijqW+hQmchxN86ii6qZPUjGDlg4 YBJCJryvlQshZj7MaZxBk+S2bJWS2kc0PGvz28pQnXx5EorFojl8iSCEuWi/zlOf7Q JYuyNzj3aHXT5xMtx19VR+HYsh4V+L0vViYHJCWtww/n9mLA763xLYViOFv28UWu0p pgovoMbLAC+1WsTrK4AgMLCZj0luQZ0ZHDyzdksv7OwUtuINlIWGj8U8o2Qtp8jjea hEL4r9DuUhnDg== Received: by finisterre.sirena.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 993671AC567F; Mon, 16 Mar 2026 01:08:10 +0000 (GMT) Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2026 01:08:10 +0000 From: Mark Brown To: Kuninori Morimoto Cc: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 22/29] ASoC: sof: name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free() Message-ID: References: <87v7fcp10x.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> <87zf4onmdi.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="66Lj/vmqsYnomhjF" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87zf4onmdi.wl-kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com> X-Cookie: Identify your visitor. --66Lj/vmqsYnomhjF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Mar 04, 2026 at 06:23:53AM +0000, Kuninori Morimoto wrote: > We have been used pcm_new()/pcm_free(), but switched to > pcm_construct()/pcm_destruct() to use extra parameters [1]. >=20 > pcm_new()/free() had been removed [2], but each drivers are still > using such function naming. Let's name back to pcm_new()/pcm_free() > again. This needs a rebase onto current for-7.1. --66Lj/vmqsYnomhjF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAmm3V/kACgkQJNaLcl1U h9CrIwf+OFGH/JmXvC6r2VLAwixj1pfZeFBBA7L1NeN1Cfhm19iAF1wmnLfP0vz+ CxxG2PiXL+d0Cs0P2JNCmwkjYTG97TkZ1HocOK5x8OAdwChF3hyWOoD9Ry8O89r2 QyL9YUvZV5ZfCJvyuiWWYgYsRptJoN0W3VK667CUgd8tEvKpCQpE11ft+/XHCW68 3Z5L/JHDUVYUEXbS6/8gf0FhDlzRoP2z1thRRCvQfwccT9BZ91RQWnBdNGMxy8CU 5QG7FtU5D2AC9bbqy37KF6oZw8PrqfyKK7FV7TQcXp9bl5zvS+p+H2GV40yGKE5c cctq8V23TttOFdp/t4pFXm7h2OH7/A== =mboj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --66Lj/vmqsYnomhjF--