From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from out-181.mta1.migadu.com (out-181.mta1.migadu.com [95.215.58.181]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 377B73FCB2B for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2026 14:50:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.181 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774968626; cv=none; b=OXjOIEuCLrgCQGryioybNL/MP4VgwN4cnGdtv17ieQ3WqS5a8V/eQ07zHQFo0KH2RC3P6eMCStZTw9t5bXdAsHMpx0FSPG11lfIDP7zQ7mryuLu/vne8t+zr0+2T26qBviL/Rv83iyXVZYehwPSTO2NkFYCgTqUwkxl5lV6dSiU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1774968626; c=relaxed/simple; bh=gUxB+Af1mMhjvQqSMuC+ymcm81VsvVn0igIzZZ5g59A=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=W5fdczvhnKIZrmAKgvuvbW3iMZ9PfFlvElWLJC2y+JM1rwDVZeXBucawJJa/e8nMvDORcEWBpXL7RK7/sv9hu7nmHqgH2RVzpIHfbm0D/+f9QlRb88RO8oBCi6kNSfxbnb538HbHYgbyeUZz14T/IIeeJoiKyU1TrMs7E9qOwhc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b=a3UAw2XX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=95.215.58.181 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.dev Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux.dev header.i=@linux.dev header.b="a3UAw2XX" Message-ID: DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.dev; s=key1; t=1774968623; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=hAFmF6AcA9k/LlSxFqvnfnE1nxWEC4MuIEHywbfiSfY=; b=a3UAw2XXWLKhUneQjHovn4myiYhqPexNRvfAoM3OekIUPgQgU6YcbJpNa6I3JRU1klqzT4 mrhfnHQ8S3nbamrt9yTO20I224Z3DaP0s3y+j5FEweUCO9loauK2cA2xtCoNakv5ye9ARn GuXZGyb9k/nB0LlxTk20FAIYRegrg7M= Date: Tue, 31 Mar 2026 16:48:16 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/6] ASoC: Intel: soc-acpi: arl: Add es9356 support To: Zhang Yi , broonie@kernel.org, tiwai@suse.com, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org Cc: peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com, yung-chuan.liao@linux.intel.com, ranjani.sridharan@linux.intel.com, kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com References: <20260327095954.3465-1-zhangyi@everest-semi.com> <20260327095954.3465-6-zhangyi@everest-semi.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Report-Abuse: Please report any abuse attempt to abuse@migadu.com and include these headers. From: Pierre-Louis Bossart In-Reply-To: <20260327095954.3465-6-zhangyi@everest-semi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_OUT > +static const struct snd_soc_acpi_link_adr arl_n_mrd_es9356_link0[] = { > + { > + .mask = BIT(1), link0 uses BIT(1)? One of the two is incorrect, which is it? > + .num_adr = ARRAY_SIZE(es9356_adr), > + .adr_d = es9356_adr, > + }, > + {} > +};