Linux Sound subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org>
To: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>,
	Dmitry Baryshkov <dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: broonie@kernel.org, andersson@kernel.org, krzk+dt@kernel.org,
	ivprusov@salutedevices.com, luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com,
	zhoubinbin@loongson.cn, paulha@opensource.cirrus.com,
	lgirdwood@gmail.com, robh@kernel.org, conor+dt@kernel.org,
	konradybcio@kernel.org, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com,
	linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org,
	devicetree@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	johan+linaro@kernel.org,
	Christopher Obbard <christopher.obbard@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 5/6] ASoC: codecs: wcd938x: add mux control support for hp audio mux
Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 21:39:04 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b993c7a4-ff3e-4e79-bde8-2b5bdf3f2fff@linaro.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <14b7f2cb-6f40-f8b8-b3de-fe99080e6e40@axentia.se>

Thanks Peter,

On 25/03/2025 20:13, Peter Rosin wrote:
> Hi!
> 
> 2025-03-25 at 19:04, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
>> I wish we could be taken care in mux-core or even in the deselect api
> 
> It is not easily done. A mux is a shared resource. How can the mux core
> know if it is consumer A or consumer B that deselects the mux if both
> ignore failures when calling select? Mux select is backed by a semaphore
> and there is no guarantee that a consumer selects/deselects from the
> same thread or anything like that. The onus is on the consumer to get
> this right and only deselect when select is successful.

Should deselect fail if there was no previous mux selected?

> 
> I believe the documentation is clear on this topic: "do not call
> mux_control_deselect() if mux_control_select() fails".

True, the documentation is pretty clear about this behavior.
> 
> One thing can be done from the mux core, and that is to provide a new
> API where consumers get a mux that is exclusive so that the consumer
> can call select/deselect without involving a lock in the core. There
> need not even be a requirement to call deselect between selects in that
> case. Such an API is what many consumers want, I think, but it is of
> course not really compatible with the existing API, which is totally
> focused on the need to share a mux among multiple consumers.
> 
exclusive apis would simplify the consumer side of code for sure.

> And, of course, someone has to do it.

Yes, I can give it a go and see how it will turn out.

--srini
> 
> Cheers,
> Peter

  reply	other threads:[~2025-03-25 21:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-03-25 11:40 [PATCH v5 0/6] ASoC: wcd938x: enable t14s audio headset srinivas.kandagatla
2025-03-25 11:40 ` [PATCH v5 1/6] dt-bindings: mux: add optional regulator binding to gpio mux srinivas.kandagatla
2025-03-25 11:40 ` [PATCH v5 2/6] mux: gpio: add optional regulator support srinivas.kandagatla
2025-03-25 11:40 ` [PATCH v5 3/6] ASoC: codecs: wcd-mbhc: cleanup swap_gnd_mic api srinivas.kandagatla
2025-03-25 11:40 ` [PATCH v5 4/6] ASoC: dt-bindings: wcd93xx: add bindings for audio mux controlling hp srinivas.kandagatla
2025-03-25 11:40 ` [PATCH v5 5/6] ASoC: codecs: wcd938x: add mux control support for hp audio mux srinivas.kandagatla
2025-03-25 13:36   ` Dmitry Baryshkov
2025-03-25 18:04     ` Srinivas Kandagatla
2025-03-25 20:13       ` Peter Rosin
2025-03-25 21:39         ` Srinivas Kandagatla [this message]
2025-03-25 11:40 ` [PATCH v5 6/6] arm64: dts: qcom: x1e78100-t14s: Enable audio headset support srinivas.kandagatla

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b993c7a4-ff3e-4e79-bde8-2b5bdf3f2fff@linaro.org \
    --to=srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org \
    --cc=andersson@kernel.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=christopher.obbard@linaro.org \
    --cc=conor+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=dmitry.baryshkov@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=ivprusov@salutedevices.com \
    --cc=johan+linaro@kernel.org \
    --cc=konradybcio@kernel.org \
    --cc=krzk+dt@kernel.org \
    --cc=lgirdwood@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=luca.ceresoli@bootlin.com \
    --cc=paulha@opensource.cirrus.com \
    --cc=peda@axentia.se \
    --cc=perex@perex.cz \
    --cc=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=tiwai@suse.com \
    --cc=zhoubinbin@loongson.cn \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox