From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from madrid.collaboradmins.com (madrid.collaboradmins.com [46.235.227.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 122C57D413; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 08:25:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.235.227.194 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712651136; cv=none; b=YTMlMAjW4UXbY0WlX025kd+8htUMNu7aE76oKfGEW/BOf4cJaYjYPpzq+gzI1+phUDso0+MPnsVjEkEBTANjRpCBvYUJu9Pu9fXCb7sRlWbA4sOV7rUvf/PVTChpfr6pKDGsATqo/nAI5YI+2ZB4CSZjujjibetnvSSmp0uYdSQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712651136; c=relaxed/simple; bh=9gq00SjHcig7A04o9+fxsqSU+z6odSuDVPgoQObKNmA=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=HBeQiB5pZjYHfs+vdomLkL12ckwV9+TqEH3NhkhlTzWQvtAwoW90er9lMUIMZqfBNk1cncZzr1pv2DzTE1bcB/hpWlKUjEiM1zaoEaMCgsfzwxDITzb2hYJGSD1woa/diax402iIKFIEp1+KvJanxO4mmeZ71MWP528TgbcNIQQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=ZvttuI9e; arc=none smtp.client-ip=46.235.227.194 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="ZvttuI9e" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1712651133; bh=9gq00SjHcig7A04o9+fxsqSU+z6odSuDVPgoQObKNmA=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=ZvttuI9eCIg0F4HYNf/0bbzuDRX52cuOZ2SeKTl5VCUPJzORaiLGin1rvmHBUNgsE yu5Fyhok5xNZ5rNO/rLpAsf4QBYgsmtN3gJqZ0kX5NB1nQtY9GUCPuKraU1hShO9SC oTfk75+AC2UDqfiXPV0S7keBS7IMVbP7b+MxRyS340r0KIut3Q6jjx21tuZbT992EM MYeG6w1x/z8zoMrNkf/QZIkiIkK8l5okw0aT/Tuob4lE1R0WuZbe8o/TuyHyWvBcAI 61044vkCiyGHYmkigpzJtiMEqELyu0tADcQ8d7EX1vYXLgiNGUfc9G+TTgcdxgYNZ+ 1Dl6/r33CG88Q== Received: from [100.115.223.179] (cola.collaboradmins.com [195.201.22.229]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: cristicc) by madrid.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1619C37809D1; Tue, 9 Apr 2024 08:25:32 +0000 (UTC) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 9 Apr 2024 11:25:31 +0300 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: Fwd: Steam Deck OLED 6.8.2 nau8821-max fails To: Daniel Martin Cc: Linux regressions mailing list , Bagas Sanjaya , Venkata Prasad Potturu , Liam Girdwood , Mark Brown , Jaroslav Kysela , Takashi Iwai , Kuninori Morimoto , Arun Gopal Kondaveeti , Pierre-Louis Bossart , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Sound System References: <4d231dc4-0183-47e1-8bfa-3dd225bf8ea3@leemhuis.info> <904ffa11-592a-4336-aed2-d6370bb01896@collabora.com> <9012f8d5-302a-4840-815a-22b1e85fda5c@collabora.com> From: Cristian Ciocaltea Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 4/9/24 10:54 AM, Daniel Martin wrote: > Why this was changed in the first place could do with some explaining, > as Valve had this implemented first in the SteamDeck (probably collabora > dev). > There were no other implementations out in the wild AFAIK & now with the > 6.8.x kernel, this issue has manifested because of an enum change. The OLED model was launched with a 6.1-based kernel which relied on a downstream implementation of the Vangogh SOF drivers. Those were mainlined by AMD way later, in v6.6, but during the upstreaming process we ended up with this unfortunate ID assignments incompatibility. > I cannot for the life of me find an alternative topology file. Where are > the other implementations? Therefore it makes sense aligning to what was > done before on the Steam Deck OLED. I'm not aware of an alternative topology file available so far. > Alternatively, if Valve could provide an updated topology file for 6.8+ > kernels, that would be great too. > Just my two cents from a humble OS dev, trying to make stuff work. I think that would be the long-term goal, so until that is figured out, the easiest workaround to get this working with mainline is to apply the enum change patch. Regards, Cristian