From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mout-p-101.mailbox.org (mout-p-101.mailbox.org [80.241.56.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EA93B397E8E; Sun, 3 May 2026 15:48:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.151 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777823289; cv=none; b=fIJ5COxoKUvCcKBc4zwFDfO5L2d0SD02M5x5zecnTV2n6evd/KzxvmH756MkWPt/GCU0lubKe7eY5BOXePruUrgdkSScbc74C3TU/Lftknh+kwJD46LomfwNQsljwqKBRrdYEZyFRikpxoiH+ZjuddRVMIPsgWv81S1hWlXMdNo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1777823289; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KMvULQt26Z7JUeaeAaMxQ2terk0U68wuEmxDC9UqF6M=; h=Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Date:In-Reply-To:References: Content-Type:MIME-Version; b=CRWwfI7pKlnAqnC//K7Wa4DhJH0M9IrqSpvpRzXEBf7c7qFWbHN58LUu/4HqhEAKV/MXYqfw8ATdld83c5Htly5MI6qnUrdwoqffalUCslUx8UF3DuMUnwMVonUSzK7qyB5bLojWgVuLu3MHqZKVPplxxK+IgpLHiDVo1v2zODs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b=pPCc8QTw; arc=none smtp.client-ip=80.241.56.151 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=mailbox.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=mailbox.org header.i=@mailbox.org header.b="pPCc8QTw" Received: from smtp1.mailbox.org (smtp1.mailbox.org [IPv6:2001:67c:2050:b231:465::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mout-p-101.mailbox.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4g7q1H3GKpz9tKb; Sun, 3 May 2026 17:48:03 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailbox.org; s=mail20150812; t=1777823283; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UoJ22uoHPxO/Fiuqw0BQb106Foyun4Y6/eKPYRUL254=; b=pPCc8QTwbHGBtpyOcgiepxODTyt5c03iNTyFiVidzF17rpDgE+prPLl06qbUcWimYLdgov p8wRU9+QPhUgz3db/co19ImRiwrtzsxOAmSRhf8T6ixwsI0qjl5NC2q6M/XB8wbZvlca4L LGh+cd2NXlbO5g5sPPxONm/p3J0MkZXjdk1xmHl64hKZ5AzRiLOCdhlfK4AooanboFwp5S lxtykgi+z5HOGvYM6qzCCgxwPys+uZEczX/QVpCVhL/VhrIBav5WglJ3E2FwZd6uEKo7wD BW79SH9nFDPO/1050XrE9EciwVqsyoqHauQwl1eI7MvRlki4gHwN52lh1V9Esg== Message-ID: Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] Documentation: adopt new coding style of type-aware kmalloc-family From: Manuel Ebner To: Jonathan Corbet , Shuah Khan , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, workflows@vger.kernel.org, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, rcu@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Date: Sun, 03 May 2026 17:47:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87o6iwczjm.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> References: <20260429070759.309110-3-manuelebner@mailbox.org> <87o6iwczjm.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-MBO-RS-ID: 795585f96704e0164ab X-MBO-RS-META: rsbayzutnfjqyda4tz9cmg9m847bfsut On Sun, 2026-05-03 at 08:56 -0600, Jonathan Corbet wrote: > Manuel Ebner writes: >=20 > > Update the documentation to reflect new type-aware kmalloc-family as > > suggested in commit 2932ba8d9c99 ("slab: Introduce kmalloc_obj() > > and family") >=20 > OK, I have applied this series.=C2=A0 While doing so, I restored the "gfp= " > parameter in the changelog portion where it had been mistakenly removed. That's good, thanks. I had two more changes lined up for v5 of this series: - ptr =3D kmalloc(sizeof(struct foo, gfp); + ptr =3D kmalloc(sizeof(struct foo), gfp); and=20 -The argument gfp is optional, the default value is GFP_KERNEL. +The argument `gfp` is optional, the default value is `GFP_KERNEL`. I don't know how to go forward with this. please advice Thanks Manuel > Thanks, >=20 > jon