From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.15]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B85FC347FD0; Wed, 17 Dec 2025 13:01:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765976471; cv=none; b=SOROhLq4qM1nq5T6lH4NUcbu715c9+bSTE7uFTUFl3Jm1s07xQhN/sgirAnO1hAmZ7HfkopRK/MS0H/5ylIj7IO6w3gP4ailAEtQ6hxoX2g8WJyEiEBA8Jcigtx0iMgIj4MEw3c+XA3iuV85gPMdV/aW/7emaZ6YH0WE29bDVww= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1765976471; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cjgn/BA7Ju+Q5Ubk2VcZLOA1TllX33llG7QDDvCmOpk=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=FyLqVQe9TV3ZUhu//NcY5yK1UNK2CCCDiPlPf8lGMghcM44QM9ifPrfvn3bJvCYJzUvWhISiunuy8qm5RJ37Uk0wPHGeiWRG4BcNH3v6+mmRC3fsBZsQoIXdV2ISlNc2HOBOKtPggJIcdggvbifCPRuiVltp+ZXIqZY4gralz0A= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=gzLzVrl3; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.15 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="gzLzVrl3" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1765976469; x=1797512469; h=message-id:date:mime-version:subject:to:cc:references: from:in-reply-to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=cjgn/BA7Ju+Q5Ubk2VcZLOA1TllX33llG7QDDvCmOpk=; b=gzLzVrl3PGCzwPuxHh6gZnZIP4r0/iJ86SVDdMJOBbJtPYFv7nFWnPiu 4LnZjga9hz3Sl3vmonnTm7WZ/GC7IoU3Y6SCXPxKEaBdRXTIhe79yxVnK uxTjRfWYPQbLsMftSsognXrBy6kSbcoQA64B8yBJMNYxoutihUTyQ2/u1 Aevda4GjaBwbfX8eVfn+CXRk+VIz0efMnClAnM05kYI4lm7dzPfuGKI6b KOMB07m17Rh0T3PXZELMJEJw2MPsBUmOvUoAzcQiiN5Q41xi14HbqGedF kCPL6v+mKUxnuieF5+IRciwXgS30w0IlnB2gM6qAEMuhXO9Ty5giaVQEJ w==; X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: z3zd+t8sSyCCVUomcrY92w== X-CSE-MsgGUID: Fn+UdWAmSJKvAXog1zQyvg== X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6800,10657,11645"; a="71542632" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,155,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="71542632" Received: from fmviesa005.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.145]) by orvoesa107.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Dec 2025 05:01:09 -0800 X-CSE-ConnectionGUID: eZp8HpbIS1ev7ELvRXINPw== X-CSE-MsgGUID: wv4Qa3EzQka36zqqvPnrEA== X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.21,155,1763452800"; d="scan'208";a="202677818" Received: from kniemiec-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO [10.245.246.187]) ([10.245.246.187]) by fmviesa005-auth.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Dec 2025 05:01:06 -0800 Message-ID: Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2025 15:01:32 +0200 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH] ASoC: soc-ops: Correct the max value for clamp in soc_mixer_reg_to_ctl() To: Richard Fitzgerald , Mark Brown Cc: lgirdwood@gmail.com, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, kai.vehmanen@linux.intel.com, seppo.ingalsuo@linux.intel.com, stable@vger.kernel.org, niranjan.hy@ti.com, ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com, sbinding@opensource.cirrus.com References: <20251217120623.16620-1-peter.ujfalusi@linux.intel.com> <6e97293c-71c1-40a8-8eba-4e2feda1e6ea@sirena.org.uk> <27404fce-b371-4003-b44b-a468572cf76d@linux.intel.com> <56411df9-3253-439a-b8eb-75c5b0175a7a@linux.intel.com> From: =?UTF-8?Q?P=C3=A9ter_Ujfalusi?= Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On 17/12/2025 14:40, Richard Fitzgerald wrote: >> >> It passes my manual tests on cs42l43, not sure how to run the unit-test >> for SX, can you by chance test this? >> > The easiest option is to run them from your kernel build tree like this: It is in my to-do list to get kunit working on my setups (Artix Linux on dev and DUTs), so it is really something that will take rest of the year easily ;) > > make mrproper > ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py run --kunitconfig=tools/testing/kunit/ > configs/all_tests.config > -- Péter