From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: llornkcor@llornkcor.com Date: Sun, 13 Sep 1998 02:11:48 +0000 Subject: Re: AWE64 initial questions Message-Id: List-Id: References: In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org No- Linux wouldnt crash.... On 13-Sep-98 Jim wrote: > For the sake of sounding rude... > But if we did that, and make it all simple like, wouldnt we then have > windoze? > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Wreski > To: rtlynch@aracnet.com > Cc: Linux Sound Mailing List ; Linux Sound > Mailing List ; Adam Wiggins ; > Hamish Moffatt > Date: Saturday, September 12, 1998 9:00 PM > Subject: Re: AWE64 initial questions > > >> >>On 12-Sep-98 rtlynch@aracnet.com wrote: >>> I would like to work on this. I've been running linux for a while now > but >>> never have bothered with sound. The last time I compiled my kernel I >>> included sound as a module but haven't made time to play around with >>> getting the plug-n-prey to work. This would be good experience for me as >>> well as force me to finish my system setup :-> >>> >>> I was thinking of just implementing the script with perl. (Seems easy >>> anough.) Are there any common pit falls that anyone can think of? >> >>Guys, while I think this is a good idea, and something that surely can help > a >>lot of people, perhaps your efforts would be better applied if you focused > on >>the sndconfig utility that already has a moderately-working implementation. >> >>Wouldn't it be better to start with the internals of sndconfig, port it to > your >>version of Linux, and resubmit the changes back to the maintainer of > sndconfig? >> >>Perhaps someone wants to make it gtk-capable, so we can have a graphical > means >>of controlling our PnP devices... >> >>Dave >>