From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: est@hyperreal.org
Date: Wed, 27 Oct 1999 17:42:56 +0000
Subject: HZ > 100 overhead
Message-Id: <marc-linux-sound-94104909204283@msgid-missing>
List-Id: <linux-sound.vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org

Paul Barton-Davis discourseth:
> >
> >Wouldn't you say that an HZ > 100 kernel is the cleanest solution?
> 
> its the cleanest, but not the best. HZ = 1000 adds about 8% overhead
> to IRQ processing *all the time*.

Are you *sure* about this?  I seem to remember there was some debate
about that figure on linux-kernel.

Eric