From: Peter Leif Rasmussen <plr@cedara.com>
To: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: motherboard/cpu combo for sound
Date: Wed, 23 Feb 2000 20:09:50 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-sound-95135030506271@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-sound-95131303730224@msgid-missing>
If price wasn't a problem for sure I would go with an SMP system, and with
the AbitBP6(?) motherboard you can even get an economic dual Celeron system.
Linux 2.4 will have a vastly improved SMP functionality and stability and
without knowing particular details I would expect multiple CPUs to handle
time critical pieces better than one CPU that must deal with everything, eg.
sound recording.
Otherwise I agree that an Athlon system now is the way to go, and I would
rather go with that than a single CPU Celeron. In any case, when you have
set your budget and found out how much you want to spend on the mobo+CPU
subsystem, if comparing Celeron and Athlon, the Athlon is faster for the
same CPU-speed and I don't know of any issues with regard to sound (the
Athlon has/had some issues with some video-cards as far as I remember).
In any case, anything but Celeron and Athlon should be avoided due to both
pure performance and price/performance issues.
Peter
Paco wrote:
>
> On 23 Feb 2000, Laura Conrad wrote:
>
> >
> > I'm going to be upgrading my machine soon. I wondered if there's
> > anyone here who follows the hardware market better than I do, and has
> > an opinion about what's a good buy at the moment.
> >
> > I'd also be interested in what people would get if price were no
> > object, although that isn't exactly the case with me. And in
> > predictions about how much better a machine I can get for less in 6
> > months.
>
> Well... if price is not an object then I'd load up with a nice fat 1GHz
> Athlon. (You'll need to wait about a month or so to get one.) As far as
> waiting goes, you'll be able to pick up a 800MHz Athlon in about a month
> for less than I paid for my 550MHz one month ago.
>
> But... if price *is* an object, and you're looking for bang-for-the-buck,
> I'd suggest a celeron (although I despise Intel) or an AMD K6-II or
> K6-III. I previously used a K6-II-350 and it worked GREAT for hard disk
> recording. Midi? I don;t know anything about that. I never use it.
>
> regards,
> -Paco
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-02-23 20:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-02-23 12:59 motherboard/cpu combo for sound Laura Conrad
2000-02-23 18:53 ` Paco
2000-02-23 20:09 ` Peter Leif Rasmussen [this message]
2000-02-24 15:57 ` Brian Alexander Todd
2000-04-17 17:36 ` Laura Conrad
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-sound-95135030506271@msgid-missing \
--to=plr@cedara.com \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox