From: Britton <fsblk@aurora.uaf.edu>
To: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: how to find the maximum fragment size for SNDCTL_DSP_SETFRAGMENT?
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2000 22:25:46 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <marc-linux-sound-96050332718065@msgid-missing> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <marc-linux-sound-96049072503276@msgid-missing>
On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, Hannu Savolainen wrote:
> On Thu, 8 Jun 2000, Britton wrote:
>
> >
> > The guide of 4front's web page says total_buffer_size/2. I know the
> > kernel buffer size used to be defined at kernel compile time. How does
> > one go about determining it now? DSP_GETBLKSZ?
> Wy would you need this information?
I'm letting my users specify the fragment size, and I try to check things
like whether what they specify is out of range before actually making the
syscall.
> If you like to get as large fragments as possible just set the fragment
> size to very big. The driver will then select the largest one it could
> support.
Ok, I didn't know it would do that. I guess there is no real reason the
user needs to know if their large fragment size was not actually set (they
already get a warning if the fragment size they request is big enough that
it will likely cause latency). That behavior might be something to add to
the 4front page.
> However changing the fragment size bigger than the default doesn't give
> any benefit. You can always write/read multiple fragments at time to get
> the same effect.
>
> > Does DSP_GETBLKSZ still
> > fix the block size so that the device must be closed and opened again in
> > order to set the fragment size?
> This is the current and future behaviour.
Thanks,
Britton
prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-06-08 22:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-06-08 18:26 how to find the maximum fragment size for SNDCTL_DSP_SETFRAGMENT? Britton
2000-06-08 21:59 ` Hannu Savolainen
2000-06-08 22:25 ` Britton [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=marc-linux-sound-96050332718065@msgid-missing \
--to=fsblk@aurora.uaf.edu \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox