From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Takashi Iwai Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 12:24:47 +0000 Subject: Re: [Alsa-devel] Re: [OT] ALSA userspace API complexity Message-Id: List-Id: References: <20060104030034.6b780485.zaitcev@redhat.com> <20060108020335.GA26114@dspnet.fr.eu.org> <20060108132122.GB96834@dspnet.fr.eu.org> In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: Hannu Savolainen Cc: Jaroslav Kysela , Olivier Galibert , Martin Drab , ALSA development , linux-sound@vger.kernel.org, LKML At Mon, 9 Jan 2006 02:33:43 +0200 (EET), Hannu Savolainen wrote: > > On Sun, 8 Jan 2006, Jaroslav Kysela wrote: > > > > - having a real kernel api for which you can make different libraries > > > depending on the need of the users > > > > > > - stop making a fundamentally unsecure shared library mandatory > > > > ALSA kernel API is real and binary compatible. > Less than an year ago you (or was it Takashi) told that the kernel API > cannot be used or documented because it may be changed any time without > notice. Hmm, that might be me. I meant as a merit of a common library as the API entry. Of course, the kernel API will be kept as much as possible as we have done it so. Takashi