From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Vijendar Mukunda" <Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>
Cc: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/13] soundwire: amd: fix ctx leak when sdw_amd_startup() fails
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2026 09:48:02 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-184836@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261026044507.2310694-8-Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] soundwire: amd: race and UAF in sdw_amd_probe() error cleanup with active IRQ
--
commit 60bd17e72e211d96b5525ff2d9fb05330bb627b0
Author: Vijendar Mukunda <Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com>
soundwire: amd: fix ctx leak when sdw_amd_startup() fails
This commit cleans up the SoundWire context and registered platform devices via
sdw_amd_exit() and clears *sdw_ctx if sdw_amd_startup() fails during
sdw_amd_probe().
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/amd_init.c b/drivers/soundwire/amd_init.c
> index 8e419ddfa5161..88004d59322ee 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/amd_init.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/amd_init.c
> @@ -166,11 +166,18 @@ static int sdw_amd_startup(struct sdw_amd_ctx *ctx)
>
> int sdw_amd_probe(struct sdw_amd_res *res, struct sdw_amd_ctx **sdw_ctx)
> {
> + int ret;
> +
> *sdw_ctx = sdw_amd_probe_controller(res);
> if (!*sdw_ctx)
> return -ENODEV;
>
> - return sdw_amd_startup(*sdw_ctx);
> + ret = sdw_amd_startup(*sdw_ctx);
> + if (ret) {
> + sdw_amd_exit(*sdw_ctx);
> + *sdw_ctx = NULL;
> + }
[Severity: High]
Could calling sdw_amd_exit(*sdw_ctx) before clearing *sdw_ctx race with the
parent ACP interrupt handler and trigger a use-after-free?
The callers of sdw_amd_probe() (snd_acp63_probe() ->
create_acp63_platform_devs() -> amd_sdw_probe() in sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c,
and amd_sof_acp_probe() / amd_sof_acp7x_probe() -> amd_sof_sdw_probe() in
sound/soc/sof/amd/acp.c) enable ACP external interrupts and register their
shared hard IRQ handlers (acp63_irq_handler(), acp_irq_handler(), and
acp7x_irq_handler()) before passing &adata->sdw as sdw_ctx to sdw_amd_probe().
In sdw_amd_probe(), *sdw_ctx (adata->sdw) is assigned immediately before
sdw_amd_startup() runs. Inside sdw_amd_startup() -> amd_sdw_manager_start() in
drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c, interrupts are unmasked before the fallible
manager enable step and before subsequent manager instances in the loop are
started:
drivers/soundwire/amd_manager.c:amd_sdw_manager_start() {
...
amd_enable_sdw_interrupts(amd_manager);
ret = amd_enable_sdw_manager(amd_manager);
if (ret)
return ret;
...
}
If amd_enable_sdw_manager() fails, or if manager 0 starts and manager 1 fails
in amd_sdw_manager_start(), sdw_amd_probe() calls sdw_amd_exit(*sdw_ctx) while
the parent PCI IRQ is active and *sdw_ctx (adata->sdw) is still non-NULL:
drivers/soundwire/amd_init.c:sdw_amd_exit() {
sdw_amd_cleanup(ctx);
kfree(ctx->peripherals);
kfree(ctx);
}
Because sdw_amd_cleanup() unregisters and frees ctx->pdev[i] (and its devres
amd_manager) and kfree(ctx) frees the context before *sdw_ctx is set to NULL, a
concurrent hard IRQ handler on another CPU can observe the non-NULL adata->sdw
pointer and dereference freed ctx or ctx->pdev[i]->dev, or schedule
amd_sdw_irq_thread after amd_sdw_manager_remove() has already canceled the work
and freed amd_manager:
sound/soc/sof/amd/acp.c:acp7x_irq_handler() {
...
if (adata->sdw) {
for (instance = 0; instance < ACP7X_SDW_MAX_MANAGER_COUNT; instance++) {
if (ext_intr_stat & acp7x_sof_sdw_ext_stat[instance]) {
sof_acp7x_handle_sdw_manager_irq(sdev, adata, desc, instance,
acp7x_sof_sdw_ext_stat[instance]);
irq_flag = 1;
}
}
}
...
}
sound/soc/amd/ps/pci-ps.c:acp63_irq_handler() {
...
if (ext_intr_stat & ACP_SDW0_STAT) {
writel(ACP_SDW0_STAT, adata->acp63_base + ACP_EXTERNAL_INTR_STAT);
amd_manager = dev_get_drvdata(&adata->sdw->pdev[0]->dev);
if (amd_manager)
schedule_work(&amd_manager->amd_sdw_irq_thread);
irq_flag = 1;
}
...
}
Unlike the normal remove paths (which call free_irq() before sdw_amd_exit()),
the IRQ remains active here. Should sdw_amd_probe() hold ctx in a local
variable and only publish *sdw_ctx after sdw_amd_startup() succeeds, while also
ensuring any interrupts enabled during a partial sdw_amd_startup() are masked
and synchronized before sdw_amd_exit() frees the devices and context?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261026044507.2310694-1-Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com?part=7
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-26 9:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-26 4:43 [PATCH v4 00/13] soundwire: amd: SoundWire manager driver bug fixes Vijendar Mukunda
2026-10-26 4:43 ` [PATCH v4 01/13] soundwire: amd: fix SDW command timeout return value handling Vijendar Mukunda
2026-10-26 4:43 ` [PATCH v4 02/13] soundwire: amd: return response on IMM status cleanup timeout Vijendar Mukunda
2026-10-26 9:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26 12:13 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2026-10-26 13:45 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2026-10-26 4:43 ` [PATCH v4 03/13] soundwire: amd: cache ping slave status to avoid spurious disconnect on timeout Vijendar Mukunda
2026-10-26 4:43 ` [PATCH v4 04/13] soundwire: amd: assert msg_lock is held in amd_sdw_read_ping_status() Vijendar Mukunda
2026-10-26 4:43 ` [PATCH v4 05/13] soundwire: amd: fix work drain ordering in remove path Vijendar Mukunda
2026-10-26 9:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-27 8:18 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2026-10-26 4:43 ` [PATCH v4 06/13] soundwire: amd: pm_runtime guard " Vijendar Mukunda
2026-10-26 4:43 ` [PATCH v4 07/13] soundwire: amd: fix ctx leak when sdw_amd_startup() fails Vijendar Mukunda
2026-10-26 9:48 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-27 4:46 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2026-10-26 4:43 ` [PATCH v4 08/13] soundwire: amd: propagate amd_init_sdw_manager() error on resume Vijendar Mukunda
2026-10-26 4:43 ` [PATCH v4 09/13] soundwire: amd: drop amd_deinit_sdw_manager() in POWER_OFF suspend Vijendar Mukunda
2026-10-26 4:43 ` [PATCH v4 10/13] soundwire: amd: replace >= ACP70 with explicit switch/case in PM paths Vijendar Mukunda
2026-10-26 4:43 ` [PATCH v4 11/13] soundwire: amd: fix interrupt gate and work drain ordering in PM ops Vijendar Mukunda
2026-10-26 10:27 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-27 8:28 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2026-10-26 4:43 ` [PATCH v4 12/13] soundwire: amd: fix IRQ thread dropping STATUS_0TO7 on simultaneous wake Vijendar Mukunda
2026-10-26 10:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-27 3:48 ` Mukunda,Vijendar
2026-10-26 4:43 ` [PATCH v4 13/13] soundwire: amd: fix STATUS_8TO11 double-clear race in wake handler Vijendar Mukunda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-184836@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Vijendar.Mukunda@amd.com \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox