Linux Sound subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Joonho Lee" <mynameisjune111@gmail.com>, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 07/14] ALSA: virtio: stage VZ capture and restart paused streams
Date: Wed, 28 Oct 2026 03:27:14 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-187420@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261028025317.92450-8-mynameisjune111@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 3 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] ALSA: virtio: unnotified capture periods across pause cause lost wakeup or XRUN
- [Medium] ALSA: virtio: staged capture counters not updated on SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_RESET
- [Medium] ALSA: virtio: race between virtsnd_pcm_pause_restart_sync_stop() and prepare
--

commit 769b2eda886498f63ca7e4ba1a0aa3578ffd2f05
Author: Joonho Lee <mynameisjune111@gmail.com>

ALSA: virtio: stage VZ capture and restart paused streams

This commit adds opt-in capture staging using request-owned buffers with
response validation and ring accounting, along with a pause release and
reprepare state machine for staged capture streams.

> diff --git a/sound/virtio/virtio_pcm.c b/sound/virtio/virtio_pcm.c
> index be3893de40a55..a3478fc8848db 100644
> --- a/sound/virtio/virtio_pcm.c
> +++ b/sound/virtio/virtio_pcm.c
> @@ -310,8 +310,94 @@ static void virtsnd_pcm_period_elapsed(struct work_struct *work)
>  {
>  	struct virtio_pcm_substream *vss =
>  		container_of(work, struct virtio_pcm_substream, elapsed_period);
> +	struct snd_pcm_substream *substream = vss->substream;
> +	struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime;
> +	size_t period_bytes;
> +	u64 period_floor;
> +	u64 snapshot;
> +	bool staged_capture;
> +	bool paused_xrun = false;
> +	bool notify = false;
> +	bool requeue = false;
> +
> +	scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &vss->lock) {
> +		staged_capture = vss->direction == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE &&
> +				 vss->capture_staging;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (!staged_capture) {
> +		snd_pcm_period_elapsed(substream);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	/* Serialize the pointer snapshot with ALSA's pointer and ACK callbacks. */
> +	guard(pcm_stream_lock_irqsave)(substream);
> +	if (!snd_pcm_running(substream)) {
> +		scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &vss->lock) {
> +			runtime = substream->runtime;
> +			paused_xrun = runtime &&
> +				      runtime->state == SNDRV_PCM_STATE_PAUSED &&
> +				      vss->runtime_active && vss->xfer_xrun;
> +		}
> +		if (paused_xrun) {
> +			/* Wake readers without sending STOP for a paused stream. */
> +			snd_pcm_stop(substream, SNDRV_PCM_STATE_XRUN);
> +		}
> +		return;
> +	}

[Severity: Medium]
What happens if a staged capture completion crosses a period boundary right
before SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_PUSH?

When virtsnd_pcm_capture_complete() copies data crossing a period boundary
and schedules vss->elapsed_period right as snd_pcm_pause() runs,
snd_pcm_pause() holds pcm_stream_lock across virtsnd_pcm_trigger() and
snd_pcm_post_pause(), which sets runtime->state to SNDRV_PCM_STATE_PAUSED.

When virtsnd_pcm_period_elapsed() in sound/virtio/virtio_pcm.c subsequently
acquires pcm_stream_lock, !snd_pcm_running(substream) is true, so it returns
early without advancing vss->capture_notified_periods or calling
snd_pcm_period_elapsed_under_stream_lock() to update runtime->status->hw_ptr.

Later, when the stream is resumed via SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_RELEASE in
virtsnd_pcm_pause_restart_start() or virtsnd_pcm_trigger() in
sound/virtio/virtio_pcm_ops.c:

sound/virtio/virtio_pcm_ops.c:virtsnd_pcm_pause_restart_start() {
	...
	scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &queue->lock) {
		guard(spinlock)(&vss->lock);
		if (vss->pause_restart_state !=
			    VIRTSND_PCM_PAUSE_RESTART_PREPARED ||
		    vss->msg_count || !vss->runtime_active || vss->xfer_xrun) {
			rc = -EBADFD;
		} else {
			rc = virtsnd_pcm_capture_send(vss);
			if (!rc)
				vss->xfer_enabled = true;
		}
	}
}

vss->elapsed_period is not rescheduled even though
vss->capture_copied_total / period_bytes > vss->capture_notified_periods, and
snd_pcm_post_pause() does not call snd_pcm_update_hw_ptr().

Could this leave readers in poll() or wait_for_avail() sleeping with
avail == 0, and on a 2-period buffer cause the next completed period to hit
audio_bytes >= vss->buffer_bytes - vss->capture_ready in
virtsnd_pcm_capture_complete() and force a premature XRUN?

[ ... ]

> diff --git a/sound/virtio/virtio_pcm_ops.c b/sound/virtio/virtio_pcm_ops.c
> index f74bf365065b6..003832d112551 100644
> --- a/sound/virtio/virtio_pcm_ops.c
> +++ b/sound/virtio/virtio_pcm_ops.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -420,6 +932,106 @@ static int virtsnd_pcm_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int command)
>  	}
>  }
>  
> +static int
> +virtsnd_pcm_pause_restart_sync_stop(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
> +{
> +	struct virtio_pcm_substream *vss = snd_pcm_substream_chip(substream);
> +	unsigned int js = msecs_to_jiffies(virtsnd_msg_timeout_ms);
> +	enum virtio_pcm_pause_restart_state state;
> +	struct virtio_snd_msg *msg;
> +	long waited;
> +	int rc;
> +
> +	scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &vss->lock) {
> +		vss->xfer_enabled = false;
> +		vss->stopped = true;
> +		state = vss->pause_restart_state;
> +	}
> +	cancel_work_sync(&vss->elapsed_period);
> +
> +	if (state == VIRTSND_PCM_PAUSE_RESTART_RESET_REQUIRED ||
> +	    virtsnd_pcm_pause_restart_transitioning(state)) {
> +		virtsnd_pcm_pause_restart_fail(vss, true);
> +		dev_err(&vss->snd->vdev->dev,
> +			"SID %u: PCM state is unknown; device reprobe required\n",
> +			vss->sid);
> +		return -EIO;
> +	}

[Severity: Medium]
Can a concurrent SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_DROP and SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_PREPARE race while
virtsnd_pcm_pause_restart_sync_stop() is sleeping and permanently wedge the
substream in VIRTSND_PCM_PAUSE_RESTART_RESET_REQUIRED?

In sound/core/pcm_native.c, snd_pcm_drop() transitions runtime->state to
SNDRV_PCM_STATE_SETUP and sets runtime->stop_operating = true under
pcm_stream_lock_irq(), then drops the stream lock and calls
snd_pcm_sync_stop(substream, true) without holding runtime->buffer_mutex:

snd_pcm_drop()
  snd_pcm_stop(substream, SNDRV_PCM_STATE_SETUP)
    runtime->stop_operating = true;
  snd_pcm_stream_unlock_irq(substream)
  snd_pcm_sync_stop(substream, true)
    substream->runtime->stop_operating = false;
    substream->ops->sync_stop(substream)
      virtsnd_pcm_pause_restart_sync_stop()

Because snd_pcm_sync_stop() clears runtime->stop_operating before calling
virtsnd_pcm_pause_restart_sync_stop(), a second thread invoking
SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_PREPARE while virtsnd_pcm_pause_restart_sync_stop() is
sleeping in virtsnd_pcm_pause_restart_send() or wait_event_timeout() will see
runtime->state == SNDRV_PCM_STATE_SETUP and runtime->stop_operating == false.

Its own call to snd_pcm_sync_stop() in snd_pcm_do_prepare() will then return
immediately without waiting for the first thread's sync_stop to finish, and
virtsnd_pcm_prepare() (or virtsnd_pcm_pause_restart_send()) in
sound/virtio/virtio_pcm_ops.c will observe the in-flight *_SUBMITTED state:

sound/virtio/virtio_pcm_ops.c:virtsnd_pcm_prepare() {
	if (pause_restart) {
		enum virtio_pcm_pause_restart_state state;

		scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &vss->lock)
			state = vss->pause_restart_state;
		if (state == VIRTSND_PCM_PAUSE_RESTART_RESET_REQUIRED ||
		    virtsnd_pcm_pause_restart_transitioning(state)) {
			virtsnd_pcm_pause_restart_fail(vss, true);
			return -EIO;
		}
	}
}

Wouldn't this transition vss->pause_restart_state to
VIRTSND_PCM_PAUSE_RESTART_RESET_REQUIRED and leave the substream unusable
until device reprobe?

[ ... ]

> @@ -586,11 +1233,66 @@ static int virtsnd_pcm_cp_ack(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
>  {
>  	struct virtio_pcm_substream *vss = snd_pcm_substream_chip(substream);
>  	struct virtio_snd_queue *queue = virtsnd_pcm_queue(vss);
> +	struct snd_pcm_runtime *runtime = substream->runtime;
>  	struct virtsnd_pcm_transfer transfer = {};
>  	int rc;
>  
>  	scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &queue->lock) {
>  		guard(spinlock)(&vss->lock);
> +		if (vss->capture_staging) {
> +			snd_pcm_uframes_t appl_ptr;
> +			snd_pcm_sframes_t diff;
> +			size_t bytes;
> +			u64 next_acked_total;
> +
> +			if (!vss->runtime_active || !runtime || !runtime->control ||
> +			    !runtime->dma_area)
> +				return -EBADFD;
> +			if (vss->xfer_xrun)
> +				return -EPIPE;
> +			if (!virtsnd_pcm_capture_counters_valid(vss)) {
> +				vss->xfer_xrun = true;
> +				schedule_work(&vss->elapsed_period);
> +				return -EPIPE;
> +			}
> +			appl_ptr = runtime->control->appl_ptr;
> +			diff = appl_ptr - vss->pcm_indirect.appl_ptr;
> +
> +			if (diff < -(snd_pcm_sframes_t)(runtime->boundary / 2))
> +				diff += runtime->boundary;
> +			if (diff < 0 ||
> +			    (snd_pcm_uframes_t)diff > runtime->buffer_size) {
> +				vss->xfer_xrun = true;
> +				schedule_work(&vss->elapsed_period);
> +				return -EPIPE;
> +			}
> +
> +			/* ACK includes any subperiod tail already copied to the ring. */
> +			bytes = frames_to_bytes(runtime, diff);
> +			if (bytes > vss->capture_ready ||
> +			    check_add_overflow(vss->capture_acked_total, (u64)bytes,
> +					       &next_acked_total) ||
> +			    next_acked_total > vss->capture_copied_total) {
> +				vss->xfer_xrun = true;
> +				schedule_work(&vss->elapsed_period);
> +				return -EPIPE;
> +			}

[Severity: Medium]
How does the staged capture accounting handle SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL_RESET when a
stream is running or paused?

virtsnd_pcm_ops uses snd_pcm_lib_ioctl, which handles SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL1_RESET
via snd_pcm_lib_ioctl_reset(). When the stream is running or paused,
snd_pcm_lib_ioctl_reset() updates runtime->status->hw_ptr (wrapping it modulo
runtime->buffer_size or zeroing it if paused), zeroes runtime->hw_ptr_base,
and sets runtime->control->appl_ptr = runtime->status->hw_ptr in
snd_pcm_post_reset() without calling substream->ops->ack().

Because vss->capture_ready, vss->capture_acked_total, and
vss->pcm_indirect.appl_ptr are not synchronized with that reset, any unread
bytes discarded by advancing appl_ptr to hw_ptr remain counted in
vss->capture_ready, which can cause virtsnd_pcm_capture_complete() to reject
subsequent completions with a ring_capacity or ring_full XRUN before the ALSA
ring is actually full.

Furthermore, once runtime->hw_ptr_base is non-zero (after a buffer wrap) or
when resetting while paused, resetting runtime->control->appl_ptr without
updating vss->pcm_indirect.appl_ptr causes the next call to
virtsnd_pcm_cp_ack() in sound/virtio/virtio_pcm_ops.c to compute a negative
diff = appl_ptr - vss->pcm_indirect.appl_ptr and fail with -EPIPE.

Should SNDRV_PCM_IOCTL1_RESET be intercepted in the ioctl callback to
reconcile vss->pcm_indirect.appl_ptr, vss->capture_acked_total, and
vss->capture_ready when vss->capture_staging is enabled?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261028025317.92450-1-mynameisjune111@gmail.com?part=7

  reply	other threads:[~2026-10-28  3:27 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-10-28  2:53 [PATCH v6 00/14] ALSA: virtio: staged capture and dsnoop recovery Joonho Lee
2026-10-28  2:53 ` [PATCH v6 01/14] ALSA: virtio: Propagate PCM send failures through ACK Joonho Lee
2026-10-28  2:53 ` [PATCH v6 02/14] ALSA: virtio: Recover PCM state after a failed start Joonho Lee
2026-10-28  2:53 ` [PATCH v6 03/14] ALSA: virtio: Retain queued messages through device reset Joonho Lee
2026-10-28  2:53 ` [PATCH v6 04/14] ALSA: virtio: Keep PCM DMA buffers alive through device ownership Joonho Lee
2026-10-28  2:53 ` [PATCH v6 05/14] ALSA: virtio: Keep control payloads alive through DMA completion Joonho Lee
2026-10-28  2:53 ` [PATCH v6 06/14] ALSA: virtio: wait through signals for PCM teardown Joonho Lee
2026-10-28  2:53 ` [PATCH v6 07/14] ALSA: virtio: stage VZ capture and restart paused streams Joonho Lee
2026-10-28  3:27   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-28  2:53 ` [PATCH v6 08/14] ALSA: virtio: account staged capture reads before RX refill Joonho Lee
2026-10-28  2:53 ` [PATCH v6 09/14] ALSA: virtio: prioritize staged capture period work Joonho Lee
2026-10-28  2:53 ` [PATCH v6 10/14] ALSA: pcm: mark stop-threshold accesses for capture policy sampling Joonho Lee
2026-10-28  2:53 ` [PATCH v6 11/14] ALSA: virtio-snd: fix dsnoop capture with staged buffers Joonho Lee
2026-10-28  2:53 ` [PATCH v6 12/14] ALSA: virtio: complete control transitions and preserve drain tail Joonho Lee
2026-10-28  2:53 ` [PATCH v6 13/14] ALSA: virtio: fence staged capture state and recovery Joonho Lee
2026-10-28  3:27   ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-28  2:53 ` [PATCH v6 14/14] docs: describe virtio-sound capture options Joonho Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-187420@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=mynameisjune111@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox