From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Tristan Madani" <tristmd@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10] ASoC: wm8994: drain delayed works on remove and probe error
Date: Thu, 29 Oct 2026 11:11:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-189168@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261029105749.3732334-1-tristmd@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] ASoC: wm8994: mic_work can be re-queued by wm1811_jackdet_bootstrap()
--
commit 57d6ba6d8a26f549eace6106e2dcf810fa0f529b
Author: Tristan Madani <tristan@talencesecurity.com>
ASoC: wm8994: drain delayed works on remove and probe error
This commit cancels pending delayed works in wm8994_component_probe() error
handling and wm8994_component_remove() to prevent works from executing after
resources are freed.
> diff --git a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8994.c b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8994.c
> index c65a7769a9d25..c95a7a4dffb19 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/codecs/wm8994.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/codecs/wm8994.c
> @@ -4574,6 +4574,11 @@ static int wm8994_component_probe(struct snd_soc_component *component)
> wm8994_free_irq(wm8994->wm8994, WM8994_IRQ_FIFOS_ERR, component);
> wm8994_free_irq(wm8994->wm8994, WM8994_IRQ_TEMP_SHUT, component);
> wm8994_free_irq(wm8994->wm8994, WM8994_IRQ_TEMP_WARN, component);
> + if (control->type == WM8994 || control->type == WM1811)
> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&wm8994->mic_work);
> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&wm8994->jackdet_bootstrap);
> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&wm8994->mic_complete_work);
> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&wm8994->open_circuit_work);
>
> return ret;
> }
> @@ -4615,6 +4620,11 @@ static void wm8994_component_remove(struct snd_soc_component *component)
> free_irq(wm8994->micdet_irq, wm8994);
> break;
> }
> + if (control->type == WM8994 || control->type == WM1811)
> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&wm8994->mic_work);
> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&wm8994->jackdet_bootstrap);
> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&wm8994->mic_complete_work);
> + cancel_delayed_work_sync(&wm8994->open_circuit_work);
[Severity: High]
Can wm8994->mic_work be re-queued here if wm8994->jackdet_bootstrap runs
after cancel_delayed_work_sync(&wm8994->mic_work) completes?
In sound/soc/codecs/wm8994.c, wm1811_jackdet_bootstrap() calls
wm1811_jackdet_irq(), which queues wm8994->mic_work when a jack is present:
static void wm1811_jackdet_bootstrap(struct work_struct *work)
{
struct wm8994_priv *wm8994 = container_of(work,
struct wm8994_priv,
jackdet_bootstrap.work);
wm1811_jackdet_irq(0, wm8994);
}
and inside wm1811_jackdet_irq():
if (present) {
...
delay = control->pdata.micdet_delay;
queue_delayed_work(system_power_efficient_wq,
&wm8994->mic_work,
msecs_to_jiffies(delay));
}
On WM1811 with jack detection enabled, powering up CLK_SYS triggers
clk_sys_event(), which schedules wm8994->jackdet_bootstrap.
Because wm1811_mic_work() can schedule wm8994->jackdet_bootstrap (via
snd_soc_dapm_force_enable_pin() -> clk_sys_event()) and
wm1811_jackdet_bootstrap() can in turn schedule wm8994->mic_work, the two
works have a cyclic dependency. If wm1811_jackdet_bootstrap() is already
executing or its timer fires between cancel_delayed_work_sync(&wm8994->mic_work)
and cancel_delayed_work_sync(&wm8994->jackdet_bootstrap), it will re-arm
wm8994->mic_work, leaving wm1811_mic_work() pending after
wm8994_component_remove() (or the wm8994_component_probe() error path) returns
and frees the component and wm8994_priv memory.
Would it make sense to use disable_delayed_work_sync() on these works during
teardown, or cancel wm8994->mic_work a second time after
cancel_delayed_work_sync(&wm8994->jackdet_bootstrap) finishes?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261029105749.3732334-1-tristmd@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-29 11:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-26 11:22 [PATCH 0/4] ASoC: cancel pending delayed works on component remove Tristan Madani
2026-10-26 11:22 ` [PATCH 1/4] ASoC: rt5668: " Tristan Madani
2026-10-26 12:21 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26 11:22 ` [PATCH 2/4] ASoC: rt5659: cancel jack_detect_work " Tristan Madani
2026-10-26 12:41 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26 19:16 ` Mark Brown
2026-10-26 11:22 ` [PATCH 3/4] ASoC: twl6040: cancel headset jack work " Tristan Madani
2026-10-26 11:22 ` [PATCH 4/4] ASoC: wm8994: drain all delayed works " Tristan Madani
2026-10-26 12:57 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-26 19:16 ` Mark Brown
2026-10-29 10:25 ` [PATCH v9] ASoC: wm8994: drain delayed works on remove and probe error Tristan Madani
2026-10-29 10:42 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-29 10:57 ` [PATCH v10] " Tristan Madani
2026-10-29 11:11 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-29 11:10 ` [PATCH v9] " Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-189168@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tristmd@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox