From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Joonho Lee" <mynameisjune111@gmail.com>, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
"Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 09/14] ALSA: virtio: add staged capture accounting and lifecycle recovery
Date: Fri, 30 Oct 2026 06:38:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-190604@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261030052629.27742-10-mynameisjune111@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] ALSA: virtio: duplicate RX buffer enqueue on non-staged pause release
- [Medium] ALSA: virtio: detached virtqueue race in virtsnd_reset_vqs() and notify_cb
- [Medium] ALSA: virtio: incomplete pause rejection recovery in virtsnd_pcm_trigger()
- [Medium] ALSA: virtio: missing virtsnd_pcm_start_failed() on running trigger error
--
commit 4e7eab1d20a52ea1742792d7fd3cc04245ceba41
Author: Joonho Lee <mynameisjune111@gmail.com>
ALSA: virtio: add staged capture accounting and lifecycle recovery
This commit adds staged capture accounting using request-owned DMA buffers
and introduces lifecycle recovery and epoch tracking across PCM operations
and device resets.
Link: https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261029085032.70689-1-mynameisjune111%40gmail.com?part=9
> diff --git a/sound/virtio/virtio_card.c b/sound/virtio/virtio_card.c
> index df7091b74a521..07d66225ce04a 100644
> --- a/sound/virtio/virtio_card.c
> +++ b/sound/virtio/virtio_card.c
> @@ -348,6 +348,22 @@ static void virtsnd_reset_vqs(struct virtio_snd *snd)
> struct virtio_device *vdev = snd->vdev;
> unsigned int i;
>
> + for (i = 0; snd->substreams && i < snd->nsubstreams; ++i) {
> + struct virtio_pcm_substream *vss = &snd->substreams[i];
> + struct virtio_snd_queue *queue = virtsnd_pcm_queue(vss);
> +
> + guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&queue->lock);
> + guard(spinlock)(&vss->lock);
> + vss->reset_epoch++;
> + vss->resetting = true;
> + vss->prepared = false;
> + vss->device_running = false;
> + vss->release_required = false;
> + vss->control_uncertain = false;
> + vss->capture_reset_observing = false;
> + vss->xfer_enabled = false;
> + vss->suspended = true;
> + }
> virtio_reset_device(vdev);
>
> /* Deleting a virtqueue does not unmap its outstanding descriptors. */
> @@ -364,9 +380,20 @@ static void virtsnd_reset_vqs(struct virtio_snd *snd)
> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->lock, flags);
> }
>
> - vdev->config->del_vqs(vdev);
> - for (i = 0; i < VIRTIO_SND_VQ_MAX; ++i)
> + for (i = 0; i < VIRTIO_SND_VQ_MAX; ++i) {
> + guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&snd->queues[i].lock);
> snd->queues[i].vqueue = NULL;
> + }
[Severity: Medium]
As reported by Sashiko on v9 [1], can an IRQ callback still observe a
non-NULL queue->vqueue after its buffers have been detached in
virtsnd_reset_vqs()?
In virtsnd_reset_vqs(), the first loop over VIRTIO_SND_VQ_MAX detaches
unused buffers under queue->lock and then drops the lock:
for (i = 0; i < VIRTIO_SND_VQ_MAX; ++i) {
struct virtio_snd_queue *queue = &snd->queues[i];
unsigned long flags;
void *msg;
spin_lock_irqsave(&queue->lock, flags);
if (queue->vqueue)
while ((msg = virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(queue->vqueue)))
if (i == VIRTIO_SND_VQ_TX || i == VIRTIO_SND_VQ_RX)
virtsnd_pcm_msg_cancel(msg);
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&queue->lock, flags);
}
Only in the separate loop above does virtsnd_reset_vqs() re-acquire
snd->queues[i].lock to set snd->queues[i].vqueue = NULL.
Because virtqueue_detach_unused_buf_split() clears
vq->split.desc_state[i].data = NULL without advancing vq->last_used_idx,
if virtsnd_pcm_notify_cb() acquires queue->lock between those two loops,
it will see queue->vqueue != NULL and call virtqueue_get_buf() on a ring
whose descriptor state was already cleared, triggering BAD_RING() in
virtqueue_get_buf_ctx_split() if the device wrote a used entry just before
virtio_reset_device().
In addition, virtsnd_ctl_notify_cb() in sound/virtio/virtio_ctl_msg.c and
virtsnd_event_notify_cb() in sound/virtio/virtio_card.c do not check
queue->vqueue under queue->lock at all before calling virtqueue_get_buf(),
virtqueue_enable_cb(), or virtsnd_event_send().
Should queue->vqueue = NULL be set inside the same queue->lock critical
section that calls virtqueue_detach_unused_buf(), and should
virtsnd_ctl_notify_cb() and virtsnd_event_notify_cb() also check
if (!queue->vqueue) under queue->lock?
[ ... ]
> diff --git a/sound/virtio/virtio_pcm_ops.c b/sound/virtio/virtio_pcm_ops.c
> index de11bf162006e..8a6499d0cfea7 100644
> --- a/sound/virtio/virtio_pcm_ops.c
> +++ b/sound/virtio/virtio_pcm_ops.c
[ ... ]
> +static int virtsnd_pcm_start_queue(struct virtio_pcm_substream *vss, u64 epoch)
> +{
> + struct virtio_snd_queue *queue = virtsnd_pcm_queue(vss);
> + int rc = 0;
> +
> + guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&queue->lock);
> + guard(spinlock)(&vss->lock);
> + if (vss->resetting || vss->reset_epoch != epoch)
> + return -ECANCELED;
> + if (vss->stopped || !vss->prepared || vss->xfer_xrun)
> + return vss->xfer_xrun ? -EPIPE : -EBADFD;
> + if (vss->control_uncertain)
> + return -EIO;
> + if (vss->direction == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE) {
> + if (vss->capture_staging)
> + rc = vss->runtime_active ? virtsnd_pcm_capture_send(vss) : -EBADFD;
> + else if (!vss->device_running)
> + rc = virtsnd_pcm_msg_send(vss, 0, vss->buffer_bytes);
> + }
[Severity: High]
On a non-staged capture stream, won't resuming from pause via
SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_RELEASE re-submit the entire capture buffer while
descriptors from before the pause are still queued or hold unread data?
When SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START initially starts a non-staged capture stream,
virtsnd_pcm_start_queue() calls virtsnd_pcm_msg_send(vss, 0,
vss->buffer_bytes) to queue all vss->nmsgs descriptors with
msg->length = period_bytes.
When SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_PUSH pauses the stream,
virtsnd_pcm_stop_device() sends VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_STOP and sets
vss->device_running = false without releasing the pending RX descriptors.
When SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_RELEASE later resumes the stream,
virtsnd_pcm_start_queue() sees !vss->device_running == true and calls
virtsnd_pcm_msg_send(vss, 0, vss->buffer_bytes) again across the whole
buffer:
msg->length += n;
if (msg->length == period_bytes) {
For descriptors still pending in the virtqueue, msg->length is incremented
to 2 * period_bytes, corrupting vss->hw_ptr accounting on error status and
preventing subsequent ACK re-submissions. For descriptors that already
completed before or during pause and are waiting for userspace to read and
ACK them, virtsnd_pcm_msg_send() re-queues them into the RX virtqueue,
allowing the device to overwrite unread audio samples via DMA.
> + if (!rc)
> + vss->xfer_enabled = true;
> + return rc;
> +}
> +
> /**
> * virtsnd_pcm_trigger() -Start/stop/pause/resume the PCM substream.
> * @substream: Kernel ALSA substream.
> @@ -377,68 +1087,219 @@ static int virtsnd_pcm_prepare(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
> static int virtsnd_pcm_trigger(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream, int command)
> {
> struct virtio_pcm_substream *vss = snd_pcm_substream_chip(substream);
> - struct virtio_snd *snd = vss->snd;
> - struct virtio_snd_queue *queue;
> struct virtio_snd_msg *msg;
> int rc = 0;
> + bool running;
> + u64 epoch;
> +
> + scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &vss->lock)
> + epoch = vss->reset_epoch;
> +
> + if (virtsnd_pcm_pause_restart_enabled(vss)) {
> + switch (command) {
> + case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START:
> + return virtsnd_pcm_pause_restart_start(vss, false);
> + case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_RELEASE:
> + return virtsnd_pcm_pause_restart_start(vss, true);
> + case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_PUSH:
> + return virtsnd_pcm_pause_restart_pause(vss);
> + case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_STOP:
> + return virtsnd_pcm_pause_restart_stop(vss, false);
> + case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_SUSPEND:
> + return virtsnd_pcm_pause_restart_stop(vss, true);
> + default:
> + return -EINVAL;
> + }
> + }
>
> switch (command) {
> case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START:
> case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_RELEASE:
> - queue = virtsnd_pcm_queue(vss);
> -
> - scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &queue->lock) {
> - guard(spinlock)(&vss->lock);
> - if (vss->stopped) {
> - substream->runtime->stop_operating = true;
> - return -EBADFD;
> - }
> - if (vss->direction == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE)
> - rc = virtsnd_pcm_msg_send(vss, 0, vss->buffer_bytes);
> - if (rc) {
> - vss->stopped = true;
> - substream->runtime->stop_operating = true;
> - return rc;
> - }
> - vss->xfer_enabled = true;
> + scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &vss->lock)
> + running = vss->device_running;
> + /* Refill RX descriptors returned during a rejected native pause. */
> + if (running)
> + return virtsnd_pcm_start_queue(vss, epoch);
[Severity: Medium]
As reported by Sashiko on v9 [1], what happens when running is true here
and virtsnd_pcm_start_queue(vss, epoch) fails, or when it succeeds on a
staged capture stream?
When SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_PUSH is rejected by the device in
virtsnd_pcm_stop_device(), vss->device_running remains true. When
SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_RELEASE subsequently runs (either from
snd_pcm_undo_pause(), which ignores the trigger return value, or a later
resume on a linked substream), virtsnd_pcm_trigger() sees running == true
and returns virtsnd_pcm_start_queue(vss, epoch) directly.
If virtsnd_pcm_start_queue() fails (for example, if
virtsnd_pcm_capture_refresh_mode_locked() returns -EPIPE after a
stop_threshold update, or virtqueue_add_sgs() fails while refilling
descriptors completed after PAUSE_PUSH), this early return bypasses
virtsnd_pcm_start_failed(vss, epoch), leaving vss->xfer_enabled,
vss->stopped, substream->runtime->stop_operating, and vss->xfer_xrun
unlatched and failing to schedule elapsed_period work to wake blocked
staged-capture readers.
Conversely, if virtsnd_pcm_start_queue() succeeds for staged capture on
this running == true path, returning early skips the
virtsnd_pcm_schedule_period_elapsed(vss) call at the end of the
SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START / SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_RELEASE case.
> + rc = virtsnd_pcm_start_queue(vss, epoch);
> + if (rc) {
> + virtsnd_pcm_start_failed(vss, epoch);
> + return rc;
> }
>
> msg = virtsnd_pcm_ctl_msg_alloc(vss, VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_START,
> - GFP_KERNEL);
> + GFP_KERNEL, epoch);
> if (!msg) {
> - virtsnd_pcm_start_failed(vss);
> + virtsnd_pcm_start_failed(vss, epoch);
> return -ENOMEM;
> }
>
> - rc = virtsnd_ctl_msg_send_sync(snd, msg);
> - if (rc)
> - virtsnd_pcm_start_failed(vss);
> + rc = virtsnd_pcm_send_sync(vss, msg);
> + if (rc && rc != -ECANCELED)
> + virtsnd_pcm_start_failed(vss, epoch);
>
> + if (!rc) {
> + guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&vss->lock);
> + if (vss->resetting || vss->reset_epoch != epoch)
> + return -ECANCELED;
> + vss->device_running = true;
> + }
> + if (!rc && vss->capture_staging)
> + virtsnd_pcm_schedule_period_elapsed(vss);
> return rc;
> case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_SUSPEND:
> - vss->suspended = true;
> + scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &vss->lock)
> + vss->suspended = true;
> fallthrough;
> case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_STOP:
> case SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_PUSH:
> scoped_guard(spinlock_irqsave, &vss->lock) {
> + if (!vss->prepared)
> + return 0;
> if (command != SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_PUSH)
> vss->stopped = true;
> vss->xfer_enabled = false;
> + if (!vss->device_running)
> + return 0;
> + }
> +
> + rc = virtsnd_pcm_stop_device(vss, epoch);
> + if (rc && command == SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_PUSH &&
> + virtsnd_pcm_start_queue(vss, epoch)) {
> + guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&vss->lock);
> + if (vss->reset_epoch == epoch && !vss->resetting) {
> + vss->xfer_xrun = true;
> + vss->stopped = true;
> + substream->runtime->stop_operating = true;
> + virtsnd_pcm_schedule_period_elapsed(vss);
> + }
> + }
> + return rc;
[Severity: Medium]
As reported by Sashiko on v9 [1], can a non-staged capture stream stall if
VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_STOP is rejected during SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_PUSH?
Before calling virtsnd_pcm_stop_device(vss, epoch),
SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_PUSH sets vss->xfer_enabled = false. While
VIRTIO_SND_R_PCM_STOP is in flight, the device is still running and can
complete queued RX buffers. In virtsnd_pcm_msg_complete(), completions for
non-staged capture advance vss->hw_ptr, clear msg->length = 0, and
decrement vss->msg_count, but skip virtsnd_pcm_schedule_period_elapsed(vss)
because vss->xfer_enabled is false.
When virtsnd_pcm_stop_device() fails and leaves vss->device_running = true,
both virtsnd_pcm_start_queue(vss, epoch) here and the subsequent
SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_RELEASE recovery path check:
if (vss->direction == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_CAPTURE) {
if (vss->capture_staging)
rc = vss->runtime_active ? virtsnd_pcm_capture_send(vss) : -EBADFD;
else if (!vss->device_running)
rc = virtsnd_pcm_msg_send(vss, 0, vss->buffer_bytes);
}
if (!rc)
vss->xfer_enabled = true;
Because vss->device_running is still true, virtsnd_pcm_start_queue() only
sets vss->xfer_enabled = true without scheduling elapsed_period work or
refilling descriptors. If all queued RX descriptors completed while
vss->xfer_enabled was false, vss->msg_count is 0 and no period work is
scheduled, so ALSA never runs pointer/ack to re-enqueue RX buffers and the
capture stream stalls indefinitely.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20261029085032.70689-10-mynameisjune111@gmail.com
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261030052629.27742-1-mynameisjune111@gmail.com?part=9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-10-30 6:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-10-30 5:26 [PATCH v10 00/14] ALSA: virtio: staged capture recovery and PCM RESET synchronization Joonho Lee
2026-10-30 5:26 ` [PATCH v10 01/14] ALSA: virtio: Propagate PCM send failures through ACK Joonho Lee
2026-10-30 5:26 ` [PATCH v10 02/14] ALSA: virtio: Recover PCM state after a failed start Joonho Lee
2026-10-30 5:26 ` [PATCH v10 03/14] ALSA: virtio: Retain queued messages through device reset Joonho Lee
2026-10-30 5:26 ` [PATCH v10 04/14] ALSA: virtio: Keep PCM DMA buffers alive through device ownership Joonho Lee
2026-10-30 5:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-30 5:26 ` [PATCH v10 05/14] ALSA: virtio: Keep control payloads alive through DMA completion Joonho Lee
2026-10-30 5:26 ` [PATCH v10 06/14] ALSA: virtio: wait through signals for PCM teardown Joonho Lee
2026-10-30 5:26 ` [PATCH v10 07/14] ALSA: pcm: mark stop-threshold accesses for capture policy sampling Joonho Lee
2026-10-30 5:26 ` [PATCH v10 08/14] ALSA: pcm: report partial progress under the stream lock Joonho Lee
2026-10-30 5:26 ` [PATCH v10 09/14] ALSA: virtio: add staged capture accounting and lifecycle recovery Joonho Lee
2026-10-30 6:38 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-10-30 5:26 ` [PATCH v10 10/14] ALSA: virtio: prioritize staged capture period work Joonho Lee
2026-10-30 5:26 ` [PATCH v10 11/14] docs: describe virtio-sound capture options Joonho Lee
2026-10-30 5:26 ` [PATCH v10 12/14] ALSA: pcm: add an optional reset operation under the stream lock Joonho Lee
2026-10-30 5:54 ` sashiko-bot
2026-10-30 5:26 ` [PATCH v10 13/14] ALSA: virtio: synchronize staged capture accounting during RESET Joonho Lee
2026-10-30 5:26 ` [PATCH v10 14/14] ALSA: virtio: rebase ordinary capture accounting on RESET Joonho Lee
2026-10-30 6:35 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-190604@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=mynameisjune111@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox