Linux Sound subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Joonho Lee" <mynameisjune111@gmail.com>, linux-sound@vger.kernel.org
Cc: virtualization@lists.linux.dev,
	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
	"Eugenio Perez" <eperezma@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v20 10/12] ALSA: virtio: serialize staged capture lifecycle and defer paused XRUNs
Date: Sat, 07 Nov 2026 15:06:55 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-202983@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261107143422.29319-11-mynameisjune111@gmail.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issues to consider:
- [Medium] ALSA: virtio: start race in virtsnd_pcm_start_queue() while
  preparing is set
- [Medium] ALSA: virtio: virtsnd_pcm_sync_stop() drops stop_operating
  when paused
--

commit 55539e87ca936ab2bb90a3215a575e0a0a27b88c
Author: Joonho Lee <mynameisjune111@gmail.com>

ALSA: virtio: serialize staged capture lifecycle and defer paused XRUNs

This commit adds staged capture support using request-owned RX buffers,
serializes PCM lifecycle operations with lifecycle_lock, and defers
paused XRUN notifications until stream resume.

> diff --git a/sound/virtio/virtio_pcm_ops.c b/sound/virtio/virtio_pcm_ops.c
> index 8fe6974130270..c7125074f6425 100644
> --- a/sound/virtio/virtio_pcm_ops.c
> +++ b/sound/virtio/virtio_pcm_ops.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -323,182 +645,779 @@ static int virtsnd_pcm_hw_params(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,

[ ... ]

> +static int virtsnd_pcm_prepare_locked(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
>  {

[ ... ]

> +	scoped_guard(pcm_stream_lock_irqsave, substream) {
> +		guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&vss->lock);
> +		if (epoch != vss->reset_epoch || vss->resetting)
> +			return -ECANCELED;
>  		vss->release_required = true;
> +		vss->buffer_bytes = snd_pcm_lib_buffer_bytes(substream);
> +		vss->hw_ptr = 0;
> +		vss->suspended = false;
> +		vss->msg_count = 0;
> +		virtsnd_pcm_msg_reset(vss);
> +		memset(&vss->pcm_indirect, 0, sizeof(vss->pcm_indirect));
> +		vss->pcm_indirect.sw_buffer_size = vss->buffer_bytes;
> +		vss->pcm_indirect.hw_buffer_size = vss->buffer_bytes;
> +		if (vss->capture_staging) {
> +			vss->capture_boundary = substream->runtime->boundary;
> +			rc = virtsnd_pcm_capture_refresh_mode_locked(vss,
> +							     &free_running);
> +			if (rc) {
> +				vss->xfer_xrun = true;
> +				vss->stopped = true;
> +				return rc;
> +			}
> +		}
> +		vss->prepared = true;
> +		vss->stopped = false;
> +		vss->xfer_xrun = false;
>  	}
> +
> +	return rc;
>  }

[ ... ]

> +static int virtsnd_pcm_start_queue(struct virtio_pcm_substream *vss, u64 epoch)
> +{
> +	struct virtio_snd_queue *queue = virtsnd_pcm_queue(vss);
> +	int rc = 0;
> +
> +	guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&queue->lock);
> +	guard(spinlock)(&vss->lock);
> +	if (vss->resetting || vss->reset_epoch != epoch)
> +		return -ECANCELED;
> +	if (vss->stopped || !vss->prepared || vss->xfer_xrun)
> +		return vss->xfer_xrun ? -EPIPE : -EBADFD;

[Severity: Medium]
Can SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_START succeed while virtsnd_pcm_prepare() is still
in progress?

Previously, virtsnd_pcm_prepare_device() kept vss->prepared false until
virtsnd_pcm_reset() ran, and virtsnd_pcm_trigger() rejected start when
vss->preparing was set.  Now virtsnd_pcm_prepare_locked() sets
vss->prepared = true before snd_pcm_do_prepare() calls
snd_pcm_reset_substream(), and neither virtsnd_pcm_start_queue() nor
virtsnd_pcm_pause_restart_start() checks vss->preparing.

Unlike snd_pcm_pre_start(), snd_pcm_drain() does not take
runtime->buffer_mutex or check runtime->buffer_accessing.  When a
prepared playback substream with queued frames (appl_ptr > hw_ptr) is
re-prepared, a concurrent drain ioctl can start the device before the
pointer reset finishes:

CPU0                                  CPU1
snd_pcm_do_prepare()
  virtsnd_pcm_prepare()
    vss->preparing = true
    vss->prepared = true
                                      snd_pcm_drain()
                                        snd_pcm_do_drain_init()
                                          snd_pcm_do_start()
                                            virtsnd_pcm_trigger(START)
                                              vss->device_running = true
                                              vss->xfer_enabled = true
  snd_pcm_reset_substream()
    virtsnd_pcm_playback_reset()
      vss->preparing = false
  snd_pcm_post_prepare()
    state = SNDRV_PCM_STATE_PREPARED  <-- device left running in PREPARED

Should virtsnd_pcm_start_queue() and virtsnd_pcm_pause_restart_start()
also reject start while vss->preparing is true?

[ ... ]

> @@ -808,42 +2060,275 @@ static int virtsnd_pcm_cp_ack(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)

[ ... ]

> +static int virtsnd_pcm_sync_stop(struct snd_pcm_substream *substream)
> +{
> +	struct virtio_pcm_substream *vss = snd_pcm_substream_chip(substream);
> +	bool owned;
> +
> +	guard(mutex)(&vss->lifecycle_lock);
> +	scoped_guard(pcm_stream_lock_irqsave, substream) {
> +		snd_pcm_state_t state = substream->runtime->state;
> +
> +		/*
> +		 * Trigger holds the PCM lock through its control requests. Wait
> +		 * for it, then leave a replacement active generation alone.
> +		 * lifecycle_lock keeps prepare from replacing an inactive one
> +		 * until sync_stop_locked has finished its teardown.
> +		 */
> +		guard(spinlock_irqsave)(&vss->lock);
> +		owned = vss->prepared || vss->release_required || vss->msg_count ||
> +			vss->device_running;
> +		if (state == SNDRV_PCM_STATE_RUNNING ||
> +		    state == SNDRV_PCM_STATE_PAUSED ||
> +		    state == SNDRV_PCM_STATE_PREPARED ||
> +		    (state == SNDRV_PCM_STATE_DRAINING &&
> +		     substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK)) {
> +			/* Core may consume this marker before a later inactive teardown. */
> +			if (owned)
> +				substream->runtime->stop_operating = true;
> +			return 0;
> +		}

[Severity: Medium]
Does virtsnd_pcm_sync_stop() drop runtime->stop_operating when a staged
capture stream with capture_pause_restart enabled is paused?

When SNDRV_PCM_TRIGGER_PAUSE_PUSH runs with capture_pause_restart
enabled, virtsnd_pcm_pause_restart_pause() sets vss->stopped = true and
calls virtsnd_pcm_release_wait(), which waits for vss->msg_count to reach
0 and clears vss->prepared and vss->release_required while transitioning
to VIRTSND_PCM_PAUSE_RESTART_RELEASED (with vss->device_running already
false).  virtsnd_pcm_trigger() then sets runtime->stop_operating = true so
that a later teardown from SNDRV_PCM_STATE_PAUSED will invoke
ops->sync_stop.

If snd_pcm_sync_stop() runs while the stream is still in
SNDRV_PCM_STATE_PAUSED, it clears runtime->stop_operating before calling
virtsnd_pcm_sync_stop().  Because owned does not include vss->stopped, it
evaluates to false and runtime->stop_operating stays false.  If the
paused stream is then torn down without resuming to RUNNING (for example
via snd_pcm_drop()), snd_pcm_running() is false so ALSA skips
virtsnd_pcm_sync_stop(), leaving vss->stopped set and vss->elapsed_period
unquiesced.  Should owned include vss->stopped?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261107143422.29319-1-mynameisjune111@gmail.com?part=10

  reply	other threads:[~2026-11-07 15:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-11-07 14:34 [PATCH v20 00/12] ALSA: virtio: fix capture accounting Joonho Lee
2026-11-07 14:34 ` [PATCH v20 01/12] ALSA: pcm: mark stop-threshold accesses for capture policy sampling Joonho Lee
2026-11-07 14:34 ` [PATCH v20 02/12] ALSA: pcm: report partial progress under the stream lock Joonho Lee
2026-11-07 14:34 ` [PATCH v20 03/12] ALSA: pcm: add an optional reset operation " Joonho Lee
2026-11-07 14:34 ` [PATCH v20 04/12] ALSA: virtio: Propagate PCM send failures through ACK Joonho Lee
2026-11-07 14:34 ` [PATCH v20 05/12] ALSA: virtio: Recover PCM state after a failed start Joonho Lee
2026-11-07 14:34 ` [PATCH v20 06/12] ALSA: virtio: Retain queued messages through device reset Joonho Lee
2026-11-07 14:34 ` [PATCH v20 07/12] ALSA: virtio: validate indirect capture appl_ptr accounting Joonho Lee
2026-11-07 14:34 ` [PATCH v20 08/12] ALSA: virtio: Keep control payloads alive through DMA completion Joonho Lee
2026-11-07 14:34 ` [PATCH v20 09/12] ALSA: virtio: wait through signals for PCM teardown Joonho Lee
2026-11-07 14:34 ` [PATCH v20 10/12] ALSA: virtio: serialize staged capture lifecycle and defer paused XRUNs Joonho Lee
2026-11-07 15:06   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-07 14:34 ` [PATCH v20 11/12] ALSA: virtio: prioritize staged capture period work Joonho Lee
2026-11-07 14:34 ` [PATCH v20 12/12] docs: describe virtio-sound capture options Joonho Lee

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-202983@kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=mynameisjune111@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox