From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Charles Keepax" <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 3/3] ASoC: SDCA: Add port constraints into sdca_asoc_set_constraints()
Date: Mon, 09 Nov 2026 16:16:52 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-205218@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261109155106.3727597-4-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential
issues to consider:
- [High] ASoC: SDCA: zero word_mask in get_port_masks() when wordlengths
are unset
- [Medium] ASoC: SDCA: 1-channel port_ch_mask in get_port_masks() when
min_ch/max_ch are 0
--
commit 8d09b518756cef71f9c60a48b6568b96a8c9556b
Author: Charles Keepax <ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com>
ASoC: SDCA: Add port constraints into sdca_asoc_set_constraints()
This commit updates sdca_asoc_set_constraints() to apply channel count and
sample format constraints derived from the SoundWire data port properties.
> diff --git a/sound/soc/sdca/sdca_asoc.c b/sound/soc/sdca/sdca_asoc.c
> index be1b4c0075796..ccbb2c4b10267 100644
> --- a/sound/soc/sdca/sdca_asoc.c
> +++ b/sound/soc/sdca/sdca_asoc.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1507,9 +1510,86 @@ static int get_cluster_mask(struct device *dev, struct sdca_function_data *funct
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static u64 get_word_mask(unsigned int width)
> +{
> + switch (width) {
> + case 8:
> + return SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S8 | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U8;
> + case 16:
> + return SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S16_BE |
> + SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U16_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U16_BE;
> + case 18:
> + return SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S18_3LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U18_3LE |
> + SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S18_3BE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U18_3BE;
> + case 20:
> + return SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S20_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U20_LE |
> + SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S20_BE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U20_BE |
> + SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S20_3LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U20_3LE |
> + SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S20_3BE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U20_3BE;
> + case 24:
> + return SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_BE |
> + SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U24_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U24_BE |
> + SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_3LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U24_3LE |
> + SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S24_3BE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U24_3BE;
> + case 32:
> + return SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S32_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_S32_BE |
> + SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U32_LE | SNDRV_PCM_FMTBIT_U32_BE;
> + default:
> + return 0;
> + }
> +}
> +
> +static int get_port_masks(struct sdw_slave *sdw, unsigned int port,
> + struct snd_pcm_substream *substream,
> + u64 *word_mask, unsigned int *ch_mask)
> +{
> + struct sdw_dpn_prop *prop;
> + unsigned int nprop;
> + int i, j;
> +
> + if (substream->stream == SNDRV_PCM_STREAM_PLAYBACK) {
> + prop = sdw->prop.sink_dpn_prop;
> + nprop = hweight32(sdw->prop.sink_ports);
> + } else {
> + prop = sdw->prop.src_dpn_prop;
> + nprop = hweight32(sdw->prop.source_ports);
> + }
> +
> + *word_mask = 0;
> + *ch_mask = 0;
> +
> + for (i = 0; i < nprop; i++) {
> + if (prop[i].num != port)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (prop[i].num_words) {
> + for (j = 0; j < prop[i].num_words; j++)
> + *word_mask |= get_word_mask(prop[i].words[j]);
> + } else {
> + for (j = prop[i].min_word; j <= prop[i].max_word; j++)
> + *word_mask |= get_word_mask(j);
> + }
[Severity: High]
Does get_port_masks() leave *word_mask as 0 when a port does not specify
wordlength properties?
The MIPI DisCo wordlength properties are optional, and drivers such as
wcd9378_sdca_read_prop() leave num_words, min_word, and max_word as 0.
When all three are 0, the else loop runs once with j = 0, get_word_mask(0)
returns 0, and sdca_asoc_set_constraints() fails PCM startup with -EINVAL
because constraints->width is 0.
> +
> + /* Only handle the number of channels for constraints. */
> + if (prop[i].num_ch_combinations) {
> + for (j = 0; j < prop[i].num_ch_combinations; j++)
> + *ch_mask |= BIT(hweight32(prop[i].ch_combinations[j]) - 1);
> + } else if (prop[i].num_channels) {
> + *ch_mask = GENMASK(prop[i].num_channels - 1, 0);
> + } else {
> + *ch_mask = GENMASK(prop[i].max_ch - prop[i].min_ch, 0);
> + }
[Severity: Medium]
As reported by Mark Brown on v2 [1], does this restrict *ch_mask to a
single channel (GENMASK(0, 0) == 0x1) when the optional channel properties
(num_ch_combinations, num_channels, max_ch, and min_ch) are all 0? That
constrains the DAI to 1 channel instead of leaving the port channel count
unconstrained, and causes sdca_asoc_set_constraints() to fail with -EINVAL
if the terminal cluster only supports multi-channel configurations.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/179413707633.3630016.13654136728294242171.b4-review@b4
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261109155106.3727597-1-ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com?part=3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-09 16:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-09 15:51 [PATCH v3 0/3] Add SoundWire port constraints into SDCA stream Charles Keepax
2026-11-09 15:51 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] ASoC: SDCA: Move DAI constraint allocation Charles Keepax
2026-11-09 15:51 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] ASoC: SDCA: Factor out helper for creating mask of Cluster channels Charles Keepax
2026-11-09 15:51 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] ASoC: SDCA: Add port constraints into sdca_asoc_set_constraints() Charles Keepax
2026-11-09 16:16 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-11-09 16:58 ` Charles Keepax
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-205218@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=ckeepax@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox