From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Gopi Chandra Sekhar Reddy Kanala" <gopi.kanala@oss.qualcomm.com>
Cc: linux-sound@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soundwire: qcom: force runtime suspend across system sleep
Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2026 11:23:31 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <sashiko-outbox-211009@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20261112-qcom-swr-system-sleep-v1-1-a61a83f6475d@oss.qualcomm.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 4 potential
issues to consider:
- [High] soundwire: qcom: bus reset on force resume skips slave and
stream re-init
- [Medium] soundwire: qcom: pm_runtime_force_suspend() leaves wake_irq
active with RPM off
- [Low] soundwire: qcom: missing pm_ptr() and modern PM macros on
swrm_dev_pm_ops
- [Low] soundwire: qcom: missing Fixes: trailer for commit 74e79da9fd46
It also noticed 1 related pre-existing issue this patch does not
introduce:
- [High] soundwire: qcom: clock underflow and missing PM cleanup in
qcom_swrm_remove() [1]
--
commit 2c857f79ae3cadb1038a8f3f2f64e481a9560e45
Author: Gopi Chandra Sekhar Reddy Kanala <gopi.kanala@oss.qualcomm.com>
> soundwire: qcom: force runtime suspend across system sleep
>
> The controller only implements runtime PM callbacks and relies on
> runtime suspend to stop the bus clock, gate hclk and arm the wake IRQ.
> That is not enough across system suspend: from the prepare phase until
> the complete phase the PM core holds a runtime PM usage count on every
> device, so a controller that is runtime active at that point stays
> active until the system resumes. This happens when suspend is entered
> within the 3 second autosuspend delay after bus activity, or when a
> peripheral driver resumes its device from its own system suspend
> callback, as the SDCA class function driver does to quiesce its
> interrupts.
>
> The bus clock then keeps running and hclk stays enabled for the whole
> suspend. On Qualcomm platforms the LPASS clock votes behind it are held
> as well, which keeps CX and DDR from collapsing in s2idle.
>
> Use pm_runtime_force_suspend() and pm_runtime_force_resume() as the
> system sleep callbacks, so the runtime suspend path always runs at
> system suspend and is undone on resume. Peripherals are children of the
> bus, so they are suspended before the controller and resumed after it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Gopi Chandra Sekhar Reddy Kanala <gopi.kanala@oss.qualcomm.com>
[Severity: Low]
This fixes the missing system sleep PM handling from when runtime PM support
was added. Should it include:
Fixes: 74e79da9fd46 ("soundwire: qcom: add runtime pm support")
> diff --git a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
> index a4cb62897192e..6884ddbe69b32 100644
> --- a/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
> +++ b/drivers/soundwire/qcom.c
> @@ -1902,6 +1902,7 @@ static int __maybe_unused swrm_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
> }
>
> static const struct dev_pm_ops swrm_dev_pm_ops = {
> + SET_SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS(pm_runtime_force_suspend, pm_runtime_force_resume)
> SET_RUNTIME_PM_OPS(swrm_runtime_suspend, swrm_runtime_resume, NULL)
> };
>
[Severity: High]
Does forcing swrm_runtime_suspend() and swrm_runtime_resume() across system
sleep skip slave and stream re-initialization when
ctrl->clock_stop_not_supported is true?
SoundWire slave drivers such as wsa881x only define runtime PM callbacks.
When system suspend is entered within the autosuspend window, the PM core
holds a runtime PM reference on the slaves, so they remain active and
slave->status stays SDW_SLAVE_ATTACHED. On resume, swrm_runtime_resume()
resets the controller and bus without calling sdw_clear_slave_status()
first:
drivers/soundwire/qcom.c:swrm_runtime_resume() {
if (ctrl->clock_stop_not_supported) {
reinit_completion(&ctrl->enumeration);
ctrl->reg_write(ctrl, SWRM_COMP_SW_RESET, 0x01);
...
qcom_swrm_init(ctrl);
...
qcom_swrm_get_device_status(ctrl);
sdw_handle_slave_status(&ctrl->bus, ctrl->status);
}
}
Because slave->status is still SDW_SLAVE_ATTACHED when the slave
re-enumerates, sdw_handle_slave_status() breaks out early without calling
sdw_initialize_slave() or notifying the codec that it was reset. If a PCM
stream was suspended while open, SWRM_COMP_SW_RESET also wipes the port
registers while *stream_prepared in qcom_snd_sdw_prepare() remains true,
breaking playback after resume.
[Severity: Medium]
Can qcom_swrm_wake_irq_handler() leave ctrl->wake_irq disabled without
resuming the controller if an in-band wake fires while runtime PM is
disabled by pm_runtime_force_suspend()?
pm_runtime_force_suspend() disables runtime PM on ctrl->dev in dpm_suspend()
before swrm_runtime_suspend() enables ctrl->wake_irq, and device IRQs stay
enabled until dpm_suspend_noirq() and are re-enabled in dpm_resume_noirq()
before pm_runtime_force_resume() runs. If a peripheral asserts the
level-high wake line during those windows, qcom_swrm_wake_irq_handler() gets
-EACCES from pm_runtime_get_sync(ctrl->dev), treats it as success, and calls
disable_irq_nosync(ctrl->wake_irq):
drivers/soundwire/qcom.c:qcom_swrm_wake_irq_handler() {
ret = pm_runtime_get_sync(ctrl->dev);
if (ret < 0 && ret != -EACCES) {
...
return ret;
}
if (ctrl->wake_irq > 0) {
if (!irqd_irq_disabled(irq_get_irq_data(ctrl->wake_irq)))
disable_irq_nosync(ctrl->wake_irq);
}
}
When dev->power.needs_force_resume is not set (for example when ctrl->dev or
its child master device was already runtime-suspended before system sleep),
pm_runtime_force_resume() does not call swrm_runtime_resume(), leaving the
controller runtime-suspended with the wake unserviced and ctrl->wake_irq
disabled.
[Severity: Low]
This isn't a bug, but could swrm_dev_pm_ops use DEFINE_RUNTIME_DEV_PM_OPS()
(or SYSTEM_SLEEP_PM_OPS() and RUNTIME_PM_OPS()) together with
pm_ptr(&swrm_dev_pm_ops) on qcom_swrm_driver instead of the deprecated
SET_*_PM_OPS() macros and __maybe_unused annotations?
[Severity: High]
This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but can qcom_swrm_remove()
underflow ctrl->hclk [1] when the device is unbound while
runtime-suspended?
swrm_runtime_suspend() calls clk_disable_unprepare(ctrl->hclk), and
qcom_swrm_remove() unconditionally calls clk_disable_unprepare(ctrl->hclk)
again without waking the device or calling pm_runtime_disable():
drivers/soundwire/qcom.c:qcom_swrm_remove() {
struct qcom_swrm_ctrl *ctrl = dev_get_drvdata(&pdev->dev);
sdw_bus_master_delete(&ctrl->bus);
clk_disable_unprepare(ctrl->hclk);
}
Unbinding while runtime-suspended triggers a clock enable_count underflow
warning and leaves runtime PM enabled on the device.
[1] https://sashiko.dev/#/bug/linux-e26e04cd-3dec-4a3d-94e6-f45403c4bb57
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20261112-qcom-swr-system-sleep-v1-1-a61a83f6475d@oss.qualcomm.com?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-11-12 11:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-11-12 10:47 [PATCH] soundwire: qcom: force runtime suspend across system sleep Gopi Chandra Sekhar Reddy Kanala via B4 Relay
2026-11-12 11:23 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=sashiko-outbox-211009@kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=gopi.kanala@oss.qualcomm.com \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox