Re: [PATCH 3/8] integer_promotions() can't get SYM_NODE

[Josh Triplett <josht@linux.vnet.ibm.com>]

On Fri, 2007-07-13 at 18:44 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> ---
>  evaluate.c |    9 ++-------
>  1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/evaluate.c b/evaluate.c
> index 7669c9a..88435da 100644
> --- a/evaluate.c
> +++ b/evaluate.c
> @@ -98,17 +98,12 @@ static struct symbol *evaluate_string(struct expression *expr)
>  	return sym;
>  }
> 
> +/* type has come from classify_type and is an integer type */
>  static inline struct symbol *integer_promotion(struct symbol *type)
>  {
>  	struct symbol *orig_type = type;
>  	unsigned long mod =  type->ctype.modifiers;
> -	int width;
> -
> -	if (type->type == SYM_NODE)
> -		type = type->ctype.base_type;
> -	if (type->type == SYM_ENUM)
> -		type = type->ctype.base_type;
> -	width = type->bit_size;
> +	int width = type->bit_size;
> 
>  	/*
>  	 * Bitfields always promote to the base type,

In addition to SYM_NODE as mentioned in the commit message, this also
removes SYM_ENUM as classify_type handles that too.  I'll append that to
the commit message.

- Josh Triplett