From: Josh Triplett <josht@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Krzysztof Halasa <khc@pm.waw.pl>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle: proscribe do-while without braces.
Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 10:05:16 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1185555916.2642.8.camel@josh-work.beaverton.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3bqdx6dlq.fsf@maximus.localdomain>
On Fri, 2007-07-27 at 18:00 +0200, Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:
>
> > it's better that we all do things the same way. What that way _is_ is
> > actually less important, unless it's something stupid, of course.
>
> It's certainly true WRT things like indentation but IMHO it shouldn't
> go that far, and if it goes, it should be non-braced version.
>
> If we prefer non-braced versions of "if" and "while", it would be
> a bit strange to require braces with "do while", wouldn't it?
Perhaps, but
1. Existing kernel style uses braces with single-statement
do-while.
2. Linus prefers (or at least preferred in October of 2006) braces
with single-statement do-while.
> Sparse warnings... I think it shouldn't complain either, unless
> called with extra parameter.
Good point; Sparse shouldn't warn about this by default. I've turned
that off in latest Sparse from Git, so you need to give -Wdo-while or
-Wall to get warnings about that. However, the kernel gives -Wall, so
you'll still see the warnings there.
- Josh Triplett
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-07-27 17:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-07-26 21:37 [PATCH] CodingStyle: proscribe do-while without braces Josh Triplett
2007-07-26 21:44 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-26 21:54 ` Josh Triplett
2007-07-27 0:18 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-07-27 0:35 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-27 16:00 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-07-27 17:05 ` Josh Triplett [this message]
2007-07-27 17:44 ` Krzysztof Halasa
2007-07-27 18:27 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-27 18:52 ` Josh Triplett
2007-07-27 0:42 ` Stefan Richter
2007-07-27 0:59 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-27 7:41 ` Stefan Richter
2007-07-27 7:53 ` Andrew Morton
2007-07-27 17:13 ` Stefan Richter
2007-07-27 1:17 ` Randy Dunlap
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1185555916.2642.8.camel@josh-work.beaverton.ibm.com \
--to=josht@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).