From: Harvey Harrison <harvey.harrison@gmail.com>
To: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] bitops: simplify generic bit finding functions
Date: Sun, 27 Apr 2008 13:38:27 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1209328707.14173.80.camel@brick> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080427203638.GW5882@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
On Sun, 2008-04-27 at 21:36 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 27, 2008 at 01:29:21PM -0700, Harvey Harrison wrote:
>
> > Oh, I didn't realize, I only did this because sparse started spewing out
> > lots of:
> > include/linux/bitops.h:166:32: warning: shift too big (65536) for type unsigned long
> >
> > due to shift by size there, and again on line 202...I just wanted something
> > that sparse wouldn't warn about and was a little easier to understand to boot.
>
> That's a sparse problem, really. I wonder if we simply should introduce a
> new node type: EXPR_WARN. So that expand would generate those from things
> like division by zero/overflow/bad shift *and* emitting an insn for those
> would generate a stored warning.
Well, even though it is a sparse problem, I think my revised version was
cleaner code anyway.
>
> Objections?
None here
Harvey
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-27 20:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1209327591.14173.74.camel@brick>
[not found] ` <alpine.LFD.1.10.0804271325350.3119@woody.linux-foundation.org>
[not found] ` <1209328161.14173.77.camel@brick>
2008-04-27 20:36 ` [PATCH] bitops: simplify generic bit finding functions Al Viro
2008-04-27 20:38 ` Harvey Harrison [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1209328707.14173.80.camel@brick \
--to=harvey.harrison@gmail.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).