From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pavel Roskin Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/9] context tracking updates Date: Thu, 29 May 2008 19:03:19 -0400 Message-ID: <1212102199.4265.46.camel@dv> References: <20080529085402.814224000@sipsolutions.net> <1212100516.28403.152.camel@brick> (sfid-20080530_003519_648056_2583259D) <1212101102.10109.5.camel@johannes.berg> <1212101465.28403.156.camel@brick> (sfid-20080530_005109_203270_E4619B0E) <1212101645.10109.7.camel@johannes.berg> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from c60.cesmail.net ([216.154.195.49]:30821 "EHLO c60.cesmail.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753275AbYE2XDV (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 May 2008 19:03:21 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1212101645.10109.7.camel@johannes.berg> Sender: linux-sparse-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Berg Cc: Harvey Harrison , Josh Triplett , Philipp Reisner , linux-sparse@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 2008-05-30 at 00:54 +0200, Johannes Berg wrote: > > > What sort? Right now, it seems to go into a dead loop on > > > fs/minix/itree_v1.c for me?! > > > > > > > It's a problem introduced with 9/9 explicitly checking inlines. > > Cool, thanks, I'm just looking at it. You may want to look at this: http://marc.info/?t=120287346100007&r=1&w=2 http://marc.info/?l=linux-sparse&m=120370800715845&w=2 It was happening in ndiswrapper because a typedef was forcing an inline function to be linearized twice. -- Regards, Pavel Roskin